International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2012, Vol. 8(2) 122-136

Recruiting, Retaining, and Fairly Compensating Our Teachers

Matthew Lynch

pp. 122 - 136   |  Manu. Number: ijpe.2012.057

Published online: June 15, 2012  |   Number of Views: 2  |  Number of Download: 25


Abstract

This article examines three interlinked problems facing public schools today: how to recruit, retain, and pay our teachers. The article begins with an overview of the  current situation in the United States, paying particular attention to schools in areas where minorities are the majority. It goes on to examine some of the causes of teacher attrition, with a special section on charter schools, which have a unique set of problems. Finally, it looks at the effects of in-school policies such as teacher pre- service and in-service programs, and then discusses several successful programs around the country, including the TAP model and the Missouri Career Ladder.

Keywords: Recruitment, retainment, fair compensation, teacher pre-service and in- service programs


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Lynch, M. (2012). Recruiting, Retaining, and Fairly Compensating Our Teachers . International Journal of Progressive Education, 8(2), 122-136.

Harvard
Lynch, M. (2012). Recruiting, Retaining, and Fairly Compensating Our Teachers . International Journal of Progressive Education, 8(2), pp. 122-136.

Chicago 16th edition
Lynch, Matthew (2012). "Recruiting, Retaining, and Fairly Compensating Our Teachers ". International Journal of Progressive Education 8 (2):122-136.

References
  1. Allensworth, E., Ponisciak, S., & Mazzeo, C. (2009). The schools teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago Public Schools. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved October 1, 2009 from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/CCSR_Teacher_Mobility.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. Borman, G., and Dowling, N. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention—a meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367–409. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Ing, M., Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 166–171. [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216. [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2007). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement (Research report). Albany, NY: Teacher Policy Research. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff. (2005). The impact of assessment and accountability on teacher recruitment and retention: Are there unintended consequences? [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, E. (2012). Teacher tenure: A Fairfax schools firing case. The Washington Post. Retrieved June           6,      2012      from http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/teacher-tenure-a-fairfax- schools-firing-case/2012/06/02/gJQAVt4l9U_story.html [Google Scholar]
  9. Carroll, S. J., Reichardt, R. E., Guarino, C. M., & Mejia, A. (2000). The distribution of teachers among California‘s school districts and schools (MR-1298.0-JIF). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. [Google Scholar]
  10. Coleman, J. S., & Campbell, E. Q. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education. [Google Scholar]
  11. DeAngelis, K. J., & Presley, J. B. (2007). Leaving schools or leaving the profession: Setting Illinois‘ record straight on teacher attrition (IERC 2007-1). Edwardsville: Illinois Education Research Council. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gill, B. P., Timpane, M., Ross, K. E., & Brewer, D. J. (2001). Rhetoric versus reality: What we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. [Google Scholar]
  13. Glazerman, S. (2004). Teacher compensation reform: Promising strategies and feasible methods to rigorously study them. Washington, D.C.: Mathematica Policy Research. [Google Scholar]
  14. Glazerman, S., Silva, T., Addy, N., Avellars, S., Max, J., McKie, A., Natzke, B., Puma, M., Wolf, P., & Greszler, R. (2006). Mathematica policy research for the U.S. Department of Education. [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldhaber, D. (2006). Everyone‘s doing it, but what does teacher testing tell us about teacher effectiveness? CRPE working paper # 2006_1. [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldhaber, D., Gross, B., & Player, D. (2007). Are public schools really losing their ―best‖?: Assessing the career transitions of teachers and their implication for the quality of the teacher workforce. Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (Working Paper 12). Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute. [Google Scholar]
  17. Guarino, C. M., Santibanez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hansen, P., & Mulholland, J.A. (2005). Caring and elementary teaching: The concerns of male beginning teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 119–131. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hanushek, E., Kain, J., & Rivkin, S. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326–354. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hanushek, E., & Raymond, M. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297– 328. [Google Scholar]
  21. Imazeki,  J.  (2005).  Teacher  salaries  and  teacher  attrition:  How  much  is   enough? Economics of Education Review, 24, 431–449. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534. [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, S. P. (2008). The status of male teachers in public education today. CEEP Education Policy Brief. [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson, S. M., Berg, J. H., & Donaldson, M. L. (2005). Who stays in teaching and why: A review of the literature on teacher retention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved May 17, 2009 from http://assets.aarp.org/www.aarp.org_/articles/NRTA/Harvard_report.pdf Kleiner,  M.  M.  (2000).  Occupational  licensing.  Journal  of  Economic  Perspectives 14(4), 189–202. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ladd, H. (2009). Teachers‘ perceptions of their wor ing conditions: How predictive of policy-relevant outcomes. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research Working Paper 33. Washington, D.C.: CALDER. [Google Scholar]
  26. Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California Schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 44–70. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lortie, D. C. (2002). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Marvel, J., Lyter, D. M., Peltola, P., Strizek, G. A., & Morton, B. A. (2006). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2004–05 teacher follow-up survey (NCES 2007–307). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mintrom, M. (2000). Leveraging local innovations: The case of Michigan‘s charter schools. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. [Google Scholar]
  30. Miron, G., & Applegate, B. (2007). Teacher attrition in charter schools. Western Michigan University: Miron. [Google Scholar]
  31. National Commission on Teaching and America‘s Future (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America‘s future. Woodbridge, VA: National Commission on Teaching and America‘s Future. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nelson, B.G. (2002). The importance of men teachers and reasons why there are so few. Minneapolis: Men Teach and Men in Child Care and Elementary Education Project. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rivkin, S., E. A. Hanushek, et al. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica 73(2), 417–458. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rotherham, A. J., & Mead, S. (2004). Back to the future: The history and politics of state teacher licensure and certification. A qualified teacher in every classroom? Appraising old answers and new ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on students‘ achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sargent, P. (2001). Real men or real teachers: Contradictions in the lives of men elementary school teachers. Harriman, TN: Men‘s Studies Press. [Google Scholar]
  37. Scafidi, B., Sjoquist, D. L., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2005). Race, poverty, and teacher mobility (Research Paper Series No. 06-51). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. [Google Scholar]