- Allen, J. Moller, K. & Stroup, D. (2003). “Is this some kind of soap opera?: A tale of two readers across four literature discussion contexts. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 225-51. International Reading Association. [Google Scholar]
- Almasi, J., Palmer, B., Garas, K., Cho, W., Shanahan, L., & Augustino, A. (2004). A Longitudinal investigation of the influence of peer discussion of text on Reading development in grades K-3. Final report submitted to the Institute of Education Sciences. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. [Google Scholar]
- Almasi, J., O’Flahavan, J., & Arya, P. (2001). A comparative analysis of student and teacher development in more and less proficient discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 96-134. [Google Scholar]
- Apple, M. (2004) Ideology and curriculum,3rd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis. Avery, P. (2004). Social studies teacher education in an era of globalization. In S. Adler (ed.) Critical issues in social studies teacher education (pp. 37-57). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Applebee, A., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685-730. [Google Scholar]
- Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies. (2002) Nashville, TN: Glenmary Research Center. CD Rom. [Google Scholar]
- Byford, J., Lennon, S. & Russell, W. (2009). Teaching controversial issues in social studies: A Research study of high school teachers. Clearing House, 82 (4),165-70. [Google Scholar]
- Carlson, D., & Schramm-Pate, L. (2005). Risky Business: Teaching about the confederate flag controversy in a South Carolina high school. In Eds. L. Weis & M. Fine. Beyond Silenced voices: Class, race and gender in united states schools (pp 217-231). New York: SUNY Press. [Google Scholar]
- Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). The Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Cornbleth, C. (2001). Climates of constraint/restraint of teachers and teaching. In W. Stanley (Ed). Social studies research for the 21st century (pp. 73-95). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Evans, P. (2002). Fifth graders’ perceptions on how they experience literature Discussion groups. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 46-49, [Google Scholar]
- Finn, P. (1999). Literacy with an attitude: Educating working-class children in their own self-interest. Albany: SUNY. [Google Scholar]
- Giroux, H. (2001). Theory and Resistance in Education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey. [Google Scholar]
- Hess, D. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The Democratic power of discussion. New York:Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Kelly, U. (1997). Schooling desire: Literacy, cultural politics, and pedagogy. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Kincheloe, J. (2004). Critical pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
- Lalik, R. & Oliver, K. (2007). Differences and tensions in implementing a pedagogy of critical literacy with adolescent girls. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1).46-70. [Google Scholar]
- Lambeth, D. & Smith, A. (2011). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of culturally responsive teacher preparation in the 21st century. Paper/poster presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, New Orleans. [Google Scholar]
- Levitt, G., & Longstreet, W. (1993). Controversy and the teaching of authentic civic values. Social Studies, 84 (4), 142-47. [Google Scholar]
- Lewis, C. (1998). Literary interpretation as a social act. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42, 168-177. [Google Scholar]
- Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education. New York: Routledge Farmer. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of Standardized testing. New York: RoutledgeFarmer. [Google Scholar]
- Pescatore, C. (2008). Current events as empowering literacy: For English and social Studies teachers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51 (4), 326-339. [Google Scholar]
- Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL.: Southern Illinois Press. [Google Scholar]
- Rosenblatt, L. (1995). Literature as exploration. New York: MLA. [Google Scholar]
- Santora, E. (2001). Interrogating privilege, plurality and possibilities in a multicultural society. In W. Stanley (Ed). Social studies research for the 21st century (pp. 149-171). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, A. (2006). Negotiating control and protecting the private: Accountability, History teachers, and the Virginia Standards of Learning. In SG Grant (Ed.) Measuring history (pp.221-247). Greenwich, CT: Information Age State of Georgia labor profile. http://explorer.dol.state.ga.us. Retrieved April 19, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography, and education. New York: Addison Wesley. Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Stringer, E. (2008). Action research in education, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. USDA economic research services. 2008 Count-level poverty rates. Retrieved April 19, 2010 [Google Scholar]
- Whitson, J. (2004). What social studies teachers need to know. In W. Stanley (Ed). Social studies research for the 21st century (pp. 9-35). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, E., et al. Teachers’ perspectives on incorporating current controversial issues into the social Studies curriculum. The International Social Studies Forum, 2 (1). 31-45. [Google Scholar]
- Winston, K. & Ross, E. (2001). In search of the social studies curriculum: Standardization, diversity and a conflict of appearances. In W. Stanley (Ed). Social studies research for the 21st century (pp. 39-71). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Young, J. (2000). Boy talk: Critical literacy and masculinities. Reading Research Quarterly, 35. 312-337. [Google Scholar]
|