International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210
International Journal of Progressive Education
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2019, Vol. 15(6) 102-121

Factors Affecting Teacher Candidates’ Value Preferences

Aylin Mentiş Köksoy & İskender Daşdemir

pp. 102 - 121   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.7   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1911-07-0005

Published online: December 08, 2019  |   Number of Views: 168  |  Number of Download: 934

Save PDF

Abstract

Since the beginning, humankind accumulated knowledge and experiences by passing them to new generations. This accumulation within societies emerged as these societies’ values. We acquire these values from our societies and we hold them up as examples in our lives. To ensure the country’s future, educational institutions and teachers have to teach these values.

The study purpose is to determine whether teacher candidates’ value preferences differ or not. Relational survey model was employed in the study. The sex of the candidates, education level of the parents, income level of the family, where they live and the program they are in make up the independent variables. Human value dimensions (power, achievement, hedonism, self-direction, stimulation, universalism, benevolence, tradition, conformity and security) of the candidates make up the dependent variables of the study. The study universe consists of seniors attending Omer Halisdemir University’s Faculty of Education during the 2016-2017 academic year. Selected by random sampling method among this universe, 380 senior teacher candidates make up the study group.

            The study results put forth that values education has effect on female candidates’ universalism, benevolence and security value tendencies, and their value tendencies are high. Also, the higher the mother’s education level, the higher the candidates’ universalism, hedonism, benevolence and security value tendencies. Yet, father’s education level does not have any effect on candidates’ value tendencies. The study, also, reveals that teacher candidates’ family income and where they live have no effect on value tendencies. Furthermore, the programs the candidates are in have effect on their universalism, hedonism, benevolence and security value tendencies.

Keywords: Teacher Candidates, Values Education, Schwartz Value Survey

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Koksoy, A.M. & Dasdemir, I. (2019). Factors Affecting Teacher Candidates’ Value Preferences . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(6), 102-121. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.7

Harvard
Koksoy, A. and Dasdemir, I. (2019). Factors Affecting Teacher Candidates’ Value Preferences . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(6), pp. 102-121.

Chicago 16th edition
Koksoy, Aylin Mentis and Iskender Dasdemir (2019). "Factors Affecting Teacher Candidates’ Value Preferences ". International Journal of Progressive Education 15 (6):102-121. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.7.
References
  1. Akbas, O. (2009). Ilkogretim Okullarinda Gorevli Brans Ogretmenlerinin Deger Ogretimi Yaparken Kullandiklari Etkinlikler: 2004 ve 2007 Yillarina Iliskin Bir Karsilastirma [Activities Used by Subject Teachers in Elementary Schools during Values: Comparison between the Years 2004-2007]. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 17(2), 403–414. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akengin, H. Saglam, D. ve Arzu DIlek, A. (2002). Ilkogretim 4. ve 5. Sinif OgrencIlerinin Sosyal BilgIler Dersi Ile Ilgili Gorusleri [Views of Fourth and Fifth Grade Pupils about Social Studies Course]. Marmara Universitesi Ataturk Egitim Fakultesi Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Altunay, E. ve Yalcinkaya, M. (2011). Ogretmen adaylarinin bilgi toplumunda degerlere Iliskin goruslerinin bazi degiskenler acisindan Incelenmesi [Examining Teacher Candidates’ Views about Values in Knowledge Society by Some Variables]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi, 17 (1), 5-28. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aydin, M.Z. (2010). Okulda Degerler Egitimi [Values Education in School], Egitime Bakis, 6(18), S.16-19.    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bacanli, H. (2006). Duyussal Davranis Egitimi [Affective Behavior Training]. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim. [Google Scholar]
  6. Basciftci, F., Gulec, N., Akdogan, T. ve Koc, Z. (2011, April). Ogretmen adaylarinin deger tercihleri Ile epistemolojik inanclarinin Incelenmesi [Examination of Teacher Candidates’ Value Preferences and their Epistemological Beliefs]. Paper presented at the 2nd İnternational Conference on New Trends in Education and their İmplications, Antalya. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brophy, H. W. & Good, T. L. (1986). Third handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: McNally. [Google Scholar]
  8. Buyukozturk, S. (2009). Sosyal Bilimler Icin veri analizi el kitabi [Data analysis handbook for Social Sciences]. Ankara: PegemA Yayincilik.  [Google Scholar]
  9. Cileli, M..& Tezer, E. (1998). Life and value orientations of Turkish university students. Adolescence, 33(129), 219-224. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cuceloglu, D. (1999). .Anlamli ve Coskulu Bir Yasam Icin “Savasci”, Sistem Yayincilik, Istanbul, s. 134, 150 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cetin, S. (2004). Degisen Degerler ve Egitim [Changing Values and Education]. Milli Egitim Dergisi, Sayi: 161, 26-32. [Google Scholar]
  12. Coskun, M. Yildirim, A. (2009). Universite OgrencIlerinin Deger Duzeylerinin Bazi degiskenler Acisindan Incelenmesi [Examining the Value Levels of University Students’ İn Terms of Some Variables]. Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi, Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, Cilt:Xİ, Sayi: 1, 311-328.  [Google Scholar]
  13. Demir, N. (2005). Orgut kulturu-is tatmini iliskisi, plastik sektorunde bir arastirma [Relationship between Oraganization Culture and Job Satisfaction: A Study on Plastic Sector]. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dickinson, D. J. (1990). The relation between ratings of teacher performance and student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 142-152. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dilmac, B. Bozgeyikli, H. & Cikili, Y. (2008). Ogretmen adaylarinin deger algilarinin farkli degiskenler acisindan Incelenmesi [The İnvestigation of Teacher Candidates’ Value Perceptions in Terms of Various Variables]. Degerler Egitimi Dergisi, 6(16), 65-92. [Google Scholar]
  16. Doganay, A. (2006). Degerler Egitimi. Hayat Bilgisi ve Sosyal Bilgiler Ogretimi [Values Education. Life Science and Social Studies Teaching] (Ed. Cemil Ozturk) (pp.255–286). Ankara: Pegem Yayincilik. [Google Scholar]
  17. Durmus, C. (1996). Degerlerin meslek gruplari acisindan Incelenmesi [Examination of values in terms of occupational groups]. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  18. Eksi, H. (2003). Temel Insani Degerlerin Kazandirilmasinda Bir Yaklasim: Karakter Egitimi Programlari [An Approach to Teach Basic Human Values: Character Education Programs]. Degerler Egitimi Dergisi, (1)1, 79–96. [Google Scholar]
  19. Eryaman, M. Y. & Riedler, M. (2009). From interpretive progressivism to radical progressivism in teacher education: Teaching as praxis. In M. Y. Eryaman (Ed.). Peter McLaren, education, and the struggle for liberation. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gander, M. J. Gardiner, H. W.  (1998). Cocuk ve Ergen Gelisimi, (Cev: A. Donmez, N. Celen, B. Onur), İmge Yayinlari, Ankara, s. 335. [Google Scholar]
  21. Genc, S. Z., & Eryaman, M. Y. (2008). Changing values and new education paradigm. Journal of Social Sciences of the Afyon Kocatepe University, 9(1), 89-102. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gerris, J.R.M. Dekovic, M., Janssens, J. M.A.M. (1997). The relationship between social and childrearing behaviors: Parents’ perspective taking and value orientations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59 (4), 834-847. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gomleksiz, M.N. Curo: E. (2011). Sosyal BilgIler dersi ogretim programinda yer alan degerlere Iliskin ogrenci tutumlarinin degerlendirilmesi [An Assessment of students’ attitudes towards values in Social Studies curriculum]. Uluslarasi Insan Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayi: 1 Yil:2011, 95-134. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gunay, G. ve Bener, O. (2011). Kadinlarin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rolleri Cercevesinde AIle Ici Yasami Algilama BIcimleri. Turkiye Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi, 15 (3), 157-171. [Google Scholar]
  25. İnal, K. (1998). Turkiye’de Ders Kitaplarinda Demokratik ve Milliyetci Degerler -27 Mayis ve 12 Eylul Askeri Mudahale Donemlerine Iliskin Bir _nceleme, (Doktora Tezi ), Ankara Universitesi, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jackson, P. W. Boostrom, R. E. & Hansen, D. T. (1998). The moral life of schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kale, N. (2007). Nasil Bir Degerler Egitimi? [What Type of a Value Education?]  Degerler ve Egitimi Uluslararasi Sempozyumu (26–28 Kasim 2004), 313–322, Istanbul: Degerler Egitimi Merkezi Yayinlari. [Google Scholar]
  28. Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel Arastirma Yontemleri [Scientific Research Methods]. (19th Edition) Ankara: Nobel Yayinevi.   [Google Scholar]
  29. Kalayci S. (2009). SPSS Uygulamali Cok Degiskenli İstatistik Teknikleri [Multi-Variable Statistical Techniques Using SPSS Application] (4th Edition). Ankara: Asil Yayin Dagitim. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kincal, R. Y. (2002) Vatandaslik Bilgisi, Mikro Yayinlari, Ankara,  s. 24. [Google Scholar]
  31. Koc K, (2007). Ilkogretim 7. Sinifta Okutulan Vatandaslik ve Insan Haklari Egitimi Dersinde Ogrenciye Kazandirilmasi Amaclanan Evrensel Degerlere Iliskin Tutumlar Uzerinde Ogretim Sisteminin Etkisi, (Yayinlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi), Firat Universitesi, Elazig,  [Google Scholar]
  32. Kusdil, M. E. & Kagitcibasi, C. (2000). Turk ogretmenlerin deger yonelimleri ve Schwartz deger kurami [Value orientations of Turkish teachers and Schwartz's theory of values running head: Values]. Turk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(45), 59-76. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mehmedoglu, U. (2006). Genclik, degerler ve din. Kuresellesme, ahlak ve degerler [Youth, values and religion: Globalisation, morals and values] (Ed. U. Mehmedoglu & Y. Mehmedoglu). Istanbul: Litera Yayincilik. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods Practical Application and Interpretation. California : Pyrczak Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  35. Milli Egitim Bakanligi (2004). Ilkogretim Hayat Bilgisi dersi programi [The program of Primary Life Science lesson] Ankara: MEB Yayinlari. [Google Scholar]
  36. Montaigne, M. D.( 1580). Denemeler, (Cev: S. Eyuboglu), Cem Yayinevi, Istanbul, 1999, s. 58. [Google Scholar]
  37. Oguz, E. (2012). Views of Pre-service Teachers on Values and Value Education, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice – 12 (2) [Supplementary Special İssue] • Spring • 1320-1325 ©2012 Educational Consultancy and Research Center www.edam.com.tr/estp [Google Scholar]
  38. Ozkan, R. (2010). Turk Egitim Sisteminde Himayeci Degerler: Ilkogretim Ders Kitaplari Ornegi [Protectionist values in Turkish education system: sample primary education course book]. Uluslararasi Insan Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 1124–1141. [Google Scholar]
  39. Riedler, M. & Eryaman M.Y.  (2016). Complexity, Diversity and Ambiguity in Teaching and Teacher Education: Practical Wisdom, Pedagogical Fitness and Tact of Teaching. International Journal of Progressive Education. 12(3): 172-186 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rousseau, J.  J. (1992). Toplum Anlasmasi, (Cev: V. Gunyol), Milli Egitim Bakanligi Yayinlari, Istanbul, s. 25. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sabuncuoglu, Z. & Tuz, M. (2003). Orgutsel psikoloji [Organizational psychology]. Bursa: Furkan Ofset [Google Scholar]
  42. Sari, E. (2005). Ogretmen adaylarinin deger tercihleri: Giresun Egitim Fakultesi Ornegi. Degerler Egitimi Dergisi, 3(10), 73-88. [Google Scholar]
  43. Safak, S. Copur, Z. ve Ozkan, M. (2006). Cocuklarin evle Ilgili Faaliyetlere Harcadiklari Zamaninin Incelenmesi. www.sdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/sszcmao.pdf. (erisim tarihi:09.03.2011). [Google Scholar]
  44. Stallard, M.L. & Pankau, J. (2008). Strengthening human value in organizational cultures [Strengthening human value in organizational cultures]. Leader to Leader, Winter, 18-23. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sen, U. (2008). Altinci Sinif Türkce Ders Kitaplarindaki Metinlerin Ilettiği Değerler Acisindan Incelenmesi [Examination of 6th Grade Turkish Textbook Passages in Terms of Values they convey]. Uluslararasi Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi, 1(5), 763–779. Retrieved from http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt1/sayi5/sayi5pdf/sen_ulker.pdf.  [Google Scholar]
  46. Somuncu, S. (2008). Ilkogretim 7. Sinif Turkce Ders Kitabindaki Edebi Metinlerin Temel Evrensel Degerleri Icermesi Bakimindan Incelenmesi Yayinlanmamis yuksek Lisans Tezi, Afyonkarahisar Kocatepe Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Mayis 2008 p. 25-29. [Google Scholar]
  47. Suh, B. K. & Traiger, J. (1999). Teaching values through elementary social studies and literature curricula. Education, 119(4), 723–727 [Google Scholar]
  48. Temel, Z. F. & Aksoy A. B. (2001). Ergen ve gelisimi: yetiskinlige ilk adim [Adolescence and development: the first step in adulthood]. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tozlu, N. & Topsakal, C. (2007). “Avrupa Birligi’ne Uyum Cercevesinde Degerler Egitimi. Degerler ve Egitimi Uluslararasi Sempozyumu, Istanbul. Degerler ve Egitimi, Istanbul: DEM Yayinlari, 177-202. [Google Scholar]
  50. Turan, S. & Aktan D. (2008). Okul hayatinda var olan ve olmasi dusunulen sosyal degerler [Existing and İdeal Social Values of School Life ss Perceived by Teachers and Students]. Türk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 227-259. [Google Scholar]
  51. YapIci, S. & YapIci, M. (2005). Gelisim ve Ogrenme Psikolojisi, Ani Yayincilik, Ankara,  s. 130. [Google Scholar]
  52. YapIci, A. & Zengin, S. Z. (2003). Ilahiyat fakultesi ogrencIlerinin deger tercih siralamalari uzerine psikolojik bir arastirma: Cukurova Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi ornegi [A psychological study on Theology Faculty students’ value preference rankings: Cukurova University Faculty of Theology sample]. Dgğerler Egitimi Dergisi, 1(4), 173–206. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yesil, R. ve Aydin, D. (2007). Demokratik Degerlerin Egitiminde Yontem ve Zamanlama [Method and Timing in Democratic Values Education]. TSA / Yil: 11, 2, 65-84. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yilmaz, E. (2009). Oğretmenlerin Deger Tercihlerinin Bazi Degiskenler Acisindan Incelenmesi [The Study into Teachers’ Value Perceptions in Terms of Various Variables]. Degerler Egitimi Dergisi Cilt 7, No. 17, 109-128. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 15 Issue 6

December 2019

All Articles

International Journal of Progressive Education

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.