International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2021, Vol. 17(4) 171-187

Metaphors of Academics in Turkey for Distance Education

Yakup Alan

pp. 171 - 187   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.11   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2101-27-0002.R2

Published online: August 08, 2021  |   Number of Views: 12  |  Number of Download: 63


Abstract

Metaphors are important ways to show how people perceive the world and life around them. By creating metaphors, people show how they position themselves life, and that of other people, their environment, and situations in their minds and what the phenomenon, for which they create a metaphor, means to them in today's world. This has been affected by COVID-19, as conducting education on a distance basis has revealed the need to examine the perceptions of people about distance education. The perceptions of academicians about distance education are also highly important, as they directly affect the learning success and performance of students. In this study, metaphors were addressed in order to determine the perceptions of academicians in Turkey about distance education. In this study, metaphors were collected from 520 academicians working at different universities. The metaphors created by the academicians about distance education were subjected to content analysis and the data were analyzed. As a result of the study, it was determined that the academicians created positive, negative, and neutral metaphors about distance education; however, they mostly used negative metaphors.

Keywords: Metaphor, Distance Education, Academicians, COVID-19


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Alan, Y. (2021). Metaphors of Academics in Turkey for Distance Education . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 171-187. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.11

Harvard
Alan, Y. (2021). Metaphors of Academics in Turkey for Distance Education . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), pp. 171-187.

Chicago 16th edition
Alan, Yakup (2021). "Metaphors of Academics in Turkey for Distance Education ". International Journal of Progressive Education 17 (4):171-187. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.11.

References
  1. Alpaslan, M. (2020). The use of distance education in the education of special talents views towards. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 126–147. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alshangeeti. A., Alsaghier, H. ve Nguyen, A. (2009). Faculty perceptions of attributes affecting diffusion of online learning in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study. In F. Salajan (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on e-Learning (pp. 10-24). Reading, UK: Academic Conferences. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aras, E., & Karakaya, Y. E. (2020). Opinions of academic staff who work at sport training institutions towards distance education: A qualitative study. Spormetre the Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 18(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.529611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Cabı, E. (2018). Teaching computer literacy via distance education: Experiences of the instructors. Başkent University Journal of Education, 5(1), 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cappel, J. J. & Hayen, R. L. (2004). Evaluating e-learning: a case study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(4,) 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2004.11647595 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Gürer, M. D., Tekinarslan, E., & Yavuzalp, N. (2016). Opinions of instructors who give lectures online about distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(1), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.74876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Holmberg, B. (1995). The evolution of the character and practice of distance education. Open learning, 10(2), 47-53. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hotaman, D. (2020). The importance of formative evaluation for success of online education. Journal of International Social Research, 13(73), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.11103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  9. Ignatow, G. & Mihalcea, R. (2017). Metaphor analysis. In Text mining (pp. 96-104). SAGE Publications, Inc, https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781483399782 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaleli Yılmaz, G., & Güven, B. (2015). Determination of preservice teachers’ perceptions of distance education through metaphors. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 299–322. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaya, M., Çitil Akyol, C., Özbek, R., & Pepeler, E. (2017). Views of academicians in “department of educational sciences” about “distance education application” at post-graduate education programs. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(64), 1616–1627. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.328632 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. Kesim, E., & Altınpulluk, H. (2014). Perceptions of distance education experts regarding the use of MOOCs. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 62–85. [Google Scholar]
  13. Khoshemehr, A. H. (2013). Distance education in information and record management: Research on the role of national libraries Iran and Turkey and conceptual model proposal [Doctoral dissertation]. Ankara University. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: a practical introduction. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ligorio, M. B., Iodice, M., & Manca, S. (2016). Metaphors and online learning. In E. Gola & F. Ervas (Eds.), Metaphor in language, cognition, and communication (Vol. 5, pp. 235–248). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.5.13lig [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lloyd, S. A., Byrne, M. M. ve McCoy, T. S. (2012). Faculty-perceived barriers of online education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(1). [Google Scholar]
  18. Lowery, D. (2013). Helping metaphorstake root in the EFL classroom, English Teaching Forum, 1, 12-17, Retrieved November 2, 2020 from https://americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/resource_files/51_1_4_lowery.pdf  [Google Scholar]
  19. Mandernach, B. J., Mason, T., Forrest, K. D. ve Hackathorn, J. (2012). Faculty views on the appropriateness of teaching undergraduate psychology courses online. Teaching of Psychology, 39(3), 203-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312450437 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  20. McEwan, A. E. (2007). Do metaphors matter in higher education? Journal of College & Character, 8(2), 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Qualıtatıve researcha guide to design and ımplementation. (Trans. Ed. S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel. [Google Scholar]
  22. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publication. [Google Scholar]
  23. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  24. Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: a system view of online learning (3th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.   [Google Scholar]
  25. Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2008). A language teacher is like… examining: Malaysian students’ perceptions of language teachers through metaphor analysis. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 192–205. [Google Scholar]
  26. O’Neil, T. (2006). How distance education has changed teaching and the role of the instructor. In E-Leader Conference, Retrieved November 1, 2020 from http://www.g-casa.com/download/ONeil_Distance_Education.pdf  [Google Scholar]
  27. Offir, B., Barth, I., Lev, Y., & Shteinbok, A. (2003). Teacher–student interactions and learning outcomes in a distance learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 65-75. [Google Scholar]
  28. Özgöl, M., Sarikaya, I., & Özturk, M. (2017). Students’ and teaching staff’s assessments regarding distance education applications in formal education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 7(2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2017.208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  30. Potts, A., & Semino, E. (2019). Cancer as a Metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1611723 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Quinn, F., Charteris, J., Fletcher, P., Parkes, M., & Reyes, V. (2018). Professional knowledge landscapes in online pre-service teacher education: An exploration through metaphor. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(10), 59-80. [Google Scholar]
  32. Reinhardt, J. (2020). Metaphors for social media‐enhanced foreign language teaching and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  33. Richardson, J.C., Koehler, A., Besser, E., Caskurlu, S. Lim, J. ve Mueller, C. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 256-297. [Google Scholar]
  34. Saban, A. (2004). Entry level prospective classroom teachers’ metaphors about the concept of “teacher. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2(2), 131-155. [Google Scholar]
  35. Saban, A. (2008). Metaphors about school. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 55, 459–496. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sharts-Hopko, N. C. (2002). Assessing rigor in qualitative research. Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care, 13(4), 84-86. [Google Scholar]
  37. Shuell, T. J. (1990). Teaching and learning as problem solving. Theory into Practice, 29, 102-108. [Google Scholar]
  38. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  39. Strenski, E. (1989). Disciplines and communities, armies and aonasteries and the teaching of composition. Rhetoric Review, 8(1), 137-146. [Google Scholar]
  40. Thibodeau, P. H. (2016) Extended metaphors are the home runs of persuasion: Don’t fumble the phrase. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(2), 53-72, https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150756 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  41. UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. Retrieved November 9, 2020 from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse [Google Scholar]
  42. Woodard, B. S. (2003). Technology and the constructivist learning environment: implications for teaching information literacy skills. Research Strategies, 19(3-4), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resstr.2005.01.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (10th ed.). Seçkin Publication. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang, F., Hu, J. (2009). A Study of metaphor and its application in language learning and teaching. International Educational Studies, 2(2), 77-81. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, S., & Fulford, C. P. (1994). Are interaction time and psychological interactivity the same thing in the distance learning television classroom? Educational Technology, 34(6), 58-64. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, W., Wang, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm130300  [Google Scholar] [Crossref]