International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2015, Vol. 11(1) 82-100

Pre-service teachers’ conceptions on use of social media in social studies education

Nihat Gürel Kahveci

pp. 82 - 100   |  Manu. Number: ijpe.2015.027

Published online: June 15, 2015  |   Number of Views: 200  |  Number of Download: 317


Abstract

The use of social media is tremendously increasing trend for personal use. At the same time, social media are penetrating to the educational settings as well. Thus purpose of this study is to investigate pre-service social studies teachers’ conceptions on use of social media in social  studies education; it is possible implications on social studies teacher education, social studies classroom and consequently citizenship education. Data were collected through open- ended interviews with 12 (6 female, 6 male) in a north western Turkish University. Designed as a qualitative study, data were analyzed inductively. Pre-service social studies  perceptions  regarding use of social media in social studies instruction were analyzed. According to data analysis, participants’ perceptions on use of social media differ both positive and negative. While some participants supported use of social media in social media instruction, some of them indicated some drawbacks to use it since possible negative effects on social studies and disadvantages for the students in social studies classrooms. Found negative and positive aspects and their probable implications to the social studies teacher education were discussed.

Keywords: Social Media; social studies; social studies teacher education; pre-service teachers


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kahveci, N.G. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions on use of social media in social studies education . International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(1), 82-100.

Harvard
Kahveci, N. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions on use of social media in social studies education . International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(1), pp. 82-100.

Chicago 16th edition
Kahveci, Nihat Gurel (2015). "Pre-service teachers’ conceptions on use of social media in social studies education ". International Journal of Progressive Education 11 (1):82-100.

References
  1. Açıkalın, M. (2009). Pre‐service elementary teachers’ beliefs about use of the Internet in the social studies classroom, European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 305-320. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barr,  R.  D.,  Barth.  J.  L.,  &  Shermis.  S.  S.              (1977).  Defining  the  Social  Studies.  Bulletin,  59. Washington: NCSS. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L.S. (2004). Teaching History for the Common Good. NJ:  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogdan, R. C., and Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction  to  theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  5. Biçen, H., & Çavuş, N. (2010). The most preferred social network sites by students. World Conference on Educational Sciences (WCES), February 04-07, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosh, E. T. (2009). Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research 35(2), 185-200. DOI: 10.1080/0250016090325064 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. [Google Scholar]
  8. Callaghan, N., & Bower, B. (2012). Learning through social networking sites- the critical role of the teacher. Educational Media International, 46 (1), 1-17. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating Instructional Strategies for Using Social Media in Formal and Informal Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 87-104. [Google Scholar]
  10. Conole, G., Laat, M., Dillon, T., and Darby, J. (2006) Student experiences of  technologies final report. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearningpedagogy/lxp_project_final_re port_nov_06.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research  Design.  Thousand  Oaks,  California:  Sage. [Google Scholar]
  12. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quanti-tative and Qualitative Research. (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  13. Çelik, H. (2011). The use of verbal language in social media in Turkey. International Journal of Turcologia 6(12). Retrieved May, 15, 2014 from http://earsiv.arel.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/245/245.pdf?sequence=2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Davis, M. R. (2010). Social Networking Goes to School. Education week Digital Directions. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2010/06/16/03networking.h03.html/&cmp=clpb-ascd [Google Scholar]
  15. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (EDs), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  16. Telecommunication and Communication Residency [Telekomünikasyon İletişim Başkanlığı]. (2011). Çocukların Sosyal Paylaşım Sitelerini Kullanım Alışkanlıklarını Araştırması Raporu [Report of Research for Children’s Social Sharing Networks Usage Habits] Retrieved June 6, 2013, from http://www.guvenliweb.org.tr/istatistikler/makaleler?page=3 [Google Scholar]
  17. Friedman,  A.  M.  (2006).  The  Internet’s  Potential  to  Affect  Social  Studies  and  Democracy. International Journal of Social Education, 21(1), 44-58. [Google Scholar]
  18. Friesen, N., & Lowe, S. (2012). The questionable promise of social media for education: connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 28: 183-  194. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gerbner, G. (1999). The stories we tell. Peace Review 11 (1), 9-15. [Google Scholar]
  20. Goulding, J. 2011. Historical Thinking and Social Media. Agora, 46 (3), 11-19. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hew, K. F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 662– 676. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hew, K. F., & Wing. S. C.  (2012). Use of Facebook: a case study of Singapore students’   experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32 (2), 181-196. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang, H., & Tang, M. (2010). Web-Based Learning Platforms Integrating Social Networking for Design Education at High Schools in China. International Conference on Computatio-nal Intelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE). 1-3. DOI: 10.1109/CISE.2010.5676838 [Google Scholar]
  24. Munoz, C., & Towner, T. (2009). Opening Facebook: How to use Facebook  in  the  college  classroom. In Gibson, I. Weber, R., McFerrin, K., R. Carlsen, & Willis, D. A. (Eds.). Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 2623–2627). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www46.homepage.villanova.edu/john.immerwahr/TP101/Facebook.pdf [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaplan, A. M., &. Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media.  Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. [Google Scholar]
  26. Keiper, T., Harwood, A., & Larson. B. E. (2000). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of infusing computer technology into social studies instruction. Theory and Research in Social Education. 28 (4), 566-579. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mao, J. (2014). Social media for learning: A mixed methods study on high school students’  technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213-223 [Google Scholar]
  28. Mayfield III, T. D. (2011). Commander's Strategy for Social Media. Joint Force Quarterly, 60 (1), 79- 83. [Google Scholar]
  29. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice. San Francisco, CA: Josey Bass. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ministry of National Education, Board of Education and Training, [Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı (TTKB)]. (2012a). Sosyal Bilgiler 4. – 5. Sınıf programı [Social studies curriculum: Grades 4-5]. Ankara: Retrieved May 17, 2013, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program2.aspx/ [Google Scholar]
  31. Ministry of National Education, Board of Education and Training, [Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı (TTKB)]. (2012b). Sosyal Bilgiler 6. – 7. Sınıf programı [Social studies curriculum: Grades 6-7]. Ankara: Retrieved May 17, 2013, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program2.aspx/ [Google Scholar]
  32. Ministry of National Education. (2012). Fatih Projesi Tanıtıldı. [Project Fatih is introduced] Retrieved June 7 2013 from http://www.meb.gov.tr/haberler/haberayrinti.asp?ID=9264 [Google Scholar]
  33. National Council for Social Studies. (NCSS). (2013). National Curriculum Standards for Social Studies: Executive Summary. Retrieved July 5, 2013, from http://www.socialstudies.org/standards/execsummary [Google Scholar]
  34. Owens, W. T. (1999). Preservice teachers’ feedback about the Internet and the implications for social studies educators. The Social Studies, 90(3), 133–40. [Google Scholar]
  35. Özmen, F., Aküzüm, C., Sünkür, M., & Baysal, N. (2011). Sosyal Ağ Sitelerinin Eğitsel Ortamlardaki İşlevselliği, 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11), 16-18 May, Elazığ, Turkey. Retrieved, April 14, 2014 from http://web.firat.edu.tr/iats/cd/subjects/instructional/ite-9.pdf [Google Scholar]
  36. Öztürk, C. (2007). Hayat Bilgisi ve Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretimi: Yapılandırmacı Bir Yaklaşım.[Life Studies and Social Studies Instruction: A constructivist Approach]. Ankara: Pegema. [Google Scholar]
  37. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  38. Postman, N. (1985).  Amusing ourselves to Death. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ractham, P., & Firpo, D. (2011). Using Social Networking Technology to Enhance Learning in  Higher Education: A Case Study Using Facebook. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. System Sciences, 1, 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  40. Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students' education‐related use of Facebook, Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157-174. [Google Scholar]
  41. Siemens, G. (2008). Learning and Knowing in Networks: Changing roles for Educators and  Designers. Retrieved July 10, 2013, fromhttp://itforum.coe.uga.edu/Paper105/Siemens.pdf [Google Scholar]
  42. Stein, L., & Prewett, A. (2009). Media Literacy Education in the Social Studies: Teacher Perceptions and Curricular Challenges. Teacher Education Quarterly, Winter, 131-148. [Google Scholar]
  43. Toğay, A., Akdur, T. E., Yetişken, C. I., & Bilici, A. (2012). Eğitim Süreçlerinde Sosyal Ağlarin Kullanimi: Bir MYO Deneyimi [Social Network use in Education Processes: An experiment a vocational tertiary school]. Retrieved, May20, 2014 from http://ab.org.tr/ab13/bildiri/302.pdf [Google Scholar]
  44. Zaidieh, A. J. Y. (2012). The use of Social Networking in Education: Challenges and Opportunities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal, 1, 18-21. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zong, G. (2002). Can Computer Mediated Communication Help to Prepare Global Teachers? An analysis of Preservice Social Studies Teachers’ Experience. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(4), 589-616. [Google Scholar]