Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Progressive Education 2008, Vol. 4(2) 40-56

Investigating the Underachievement of University Students in Turkey: Exploring Subscales

Ugur Baslanti

pp. 40 - 56

Publish Date: June 15, 2008  |   Single/Total View: 121/414   |   Single/Total Download: 175/710


Abstract

This study extends the work of Baslanti and McCoach (2006), which aimed to identify the characteristics of gifted underachievers at the university level and the reasons for their underachievement using the School Attitude Assessment Survey- Revised (SAAS-R). In this study, underachievement refers to a discrepancy between outstanding achievement shown on a standardized test and low performance in school-related tasks compared to students of the same age (Clark, 1997). The present study was conducted with 30 underachievers using a semi-structured interview with 44 questions. The interview questions addressed five factors of underachievement: academic self-perceptions, attitudes toward teachers, attitudes toward school, goal valuation, and motivation/self-regulation. Data were analyzed using content analysis and frequencies were obtained for all items. Results from the interviews indicated that the findings paralleled those obtained in the original study.

Keywords:


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Baslanti, U. (2008). Investigating the Underachievement of University Students in Turkey: Exploring Subscales. International Journal of Progressive Education, 4(2), 40-56.

Harvard
Baslanti, U. (2008). Investigating the Underachievement of University Students in Turkey: Exploring Subscales. International Journal of Progressive Education, 4(2), pp. 40-56.

Chicago 16th edition
Baslanti, Ugur (2008). "Investigating the Underachievement of University Students in Turkey: Exploring Subscales". International Journal of Progressive Education 4 (2):40-56.

References
  1. Adderholt-Elliot, M. (1989). Perfectionism and underachievement. Gifted Child Today, 12(1), 19-21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baslanti, U., & McCoach, D. B. (2006). Factors related to the underachievement of university students in Turkey. Roeper Review, 28(4), 210-215. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyce, W. M. (1998). Where do I go from here? A brief introduction to gifted education for the beginning teacher. Dissertation Abstracts, (UMI No. 1391197) [Google Scholar]
  4. Busch, C., De Maret, P.S., Flynn, T., Kellum, R., Lee, S., Meyers, B., Saunders, M., White, R. (2005). Content analysis. Retrieved October 22, 2005, from http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/research/content [Google Scholar]
  5. Butler-Por, N. (1993). Underachieving gifted students. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Mönks & [Google Scholar]
  6. A.H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research & development of giftedness & talent. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cline, S. (1999). Giftedness has many faces: Multiple talents and abilities in the classroom. New York: The Foundation for Concepts in Education. [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, G.A., & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis, R.W. (1998). Characteristics that discriminate achieving from underachieving gifted African-American students in their freshman year in an historically black university. Dissertation Abstracts, (UMI No. 9910751) [Google Scholar]
  11. Delisle, J., & Berger, S. L. (1990). Underachieving gifted students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321483) [Google Scholar]
  12. List, D. (2005). What is content analysis? Retrieved October 22, 2005, from http://www.audiencedialogue.org/kya16a.html [Google Scholar]
  13. McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate gifted achievers from gifted underachievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 144-154. [Google Scholar]
  14. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S.(2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed). Boston: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar]
  15. Peterson, J. S. (2000). A follow-up study of one group of achievers and underachievers four years after high school graduation. Roeper Review, 22, 217- 223. [Google Scholar]
  16. Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-169. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rimm, S. B. (1997). Underachievement syndrome: A national epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 416-434). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  18. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]