International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2008, Vol. 4(1) 49-65

The Information Inquisition:   High Priests of  Knowledge

Randall K. Engle

pp. 49 - 65   |  Manu. Number: ijpe.2008.012

Published online: February 15, 2008  |   Number of Views: 69  |  Number of Download: 380


Abstract

In this paper the author  examines  the  relationships  between  the  educational technology movement, the computer industry, the Bush administration’s education policies, and the Inquisition. Examples of ways in which information is manipulated, distorted, and denied public scrutiny are   discussed.

Keywords:


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Engle, R.K. (2008). The Information Inquisition:   High Priests of  Knowledge . International Journal of Progressive Education, 4(1), 49-65.

Harvard
Engle, R. (2008). The Information Inquisition:   High Priests of  Knowledge . International Journal of Progressive Education, 4(1), pp. 49-65.

Chicago 16th edition
Engle, Randall K. (2008). "The Information Inquisition:   High Priests of  Knowledge ". International Journal of Progressive Education 4 (1):49-65.

References
  1. AFL-CIO (2003). Bush budget and education. AFL-CIO. URL: http://www.aflcio.org/issues/education/ns0205b2002.cfm [8 May 2004]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Black, E.  (2001).  IBM and the Holocaust.  New York, NY:  Crown   Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  3. Borger, J. & Teather, D. (2002). As Enron scandal spreads, US starts to question cash for influence culture. Guardian Unlimited. URL: http://www.guardian.co.uk/enron/story/0,11337,634164,00.html[28 October  2003]. [Google Scholar]
  4. Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cordes, C. and Miller, E. (2000). Fool's gold: A Critical look at children and computers. Oakland, Calif.: Alliance for Childhood. URL: http://www.allianceforchildhood.net/projects/computers/computers_reports.ht m [1 November  2000]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Coulton, G. G. (1929). The inquisition. New York: Robert M. McBride & Company. [Google Scholar]
  7. Czitrom, D.J.  (1982).  Media and the American mind from Morse to   McLuhan.Chapel Hill:    University of North Carolina Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dobbs, M. (2003). Iraq: Halliburton Reaping Huge Profits:One in Three US Military Dollars Spent Goes to Contractors. Washington Post. URL: http://www.corpwatch.org/news/PND.jsp?articleid=8228  [17  December2004]. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubose, L. and Ivins, M. (2003). Education in George Bush’s America? Austin Chronicle. URL: http:www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2003-10- 03/pols_feature.html  [6 Novermber 2005]. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunham, T. (2003). Blackout. The Planet: Online Edition. URL: http://planet.wwu.edu/winter03/blackout.htm [21 September 2005]. [Google Scholar]
  11. Engle, R. K. (2001a). The mythos of educational technology. Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 21(2), pp.  87-94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Engle, R. K.  (2001b).  The neo-sophists: Intellectual integrity in the information   age. First Monday, 6(8). [Google Scholar]
  13. Flamm, K. (1988). Creating the computer: Government, industry, and high technology.   Washington, D.C.:   The Brookings Institute. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ivins, M. (2001). More foxes. San Jose Mercury News. URL: http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0824-08.htm [16 October 2004]. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kurtz, S. (2003). Testimony before the Subcommittee on Select Education,   Committee      on Education and the Workforce, U.S.  House of Representatives.Committee on Education and the Workforce Hearings. URL: http://edworkforce.house.gov/hearings/108th/sed/titlevi61903/kurtz.htm [19 September 2005]. [Google Scholar]
  16. LaFleur, J. (2003). Privacy tops reasons agencies withhold information. The News Media and the Law. URL:http://www.rcfp.org/news/mag/27-3/foi- privacyt.html[2  December 2005]. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lea, H. C. (1955). A history of the Inquisition of the middle ages. New York: Russell & Russell  Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lubar, S. (1993).   Infoculture: the Smithsonian book of information age   inventions. Boston:   Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]
  19. McChesney, R.W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times.  Chicago:  University of Illinois  Press. [Google Scholar]
  20. McIntyre, J. & Ensor, D.  (2003). Tenet admits error in approving Bush   speech. CNN.com/Inside Politics. URL: http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/11/sprj.irq.wmdspeech/ [18 November 2005]. [Google Scholar]
  21. Metcalf, S. (2002).  Reading beween the lines.  Center for collaborative   education. URLAvailable: http://www.ccebos.org./metcalfnation.1.28.02.html [23 September 2004]. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mill, J. S.  (1869).  The subjection of women.  London:  Dent-Everyman's   Library. [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller, G. (2003). Bush administration cuts public school funding to pay for new private school voucher scheme. News from Congressman, George Miller. URL: http://edworkforce.house.gov/democrats/rel2303.html [30 October 2005]. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mumford, L. (1966). Technics and human development. New York: Harvest/Harcourt,  Brace, Jovanovich. [Google Scholar]
  25. National Research Council (1999). Funding a revolution: Government support for computing research. Washington, DC:   National Academy  Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Negroponte, N.   (1995).  Being digital.  NY:  Vintage  Books. [Google Scholar]
  27. Noble, D. (1998). Digital diploma mills, Part II: The coming battle over online instruction.   URL:   http://communication.ucsd.edu/dl/ddm2.html [1 July  2000]. [Google Scholar]
  28. Paige, R. (2003).  Left behind.  The New Yorker.  10/1,  p.   11. [Google Scholar]
  29. Peters, E.  (1988).  Inquisition.  New York:  The Free   Press. [Google Scholar]
  30. Public Citizen (2003).   Secrecy and a free democratic government don’t  mix. BushSecrecy.Org. URL: http://www.bushsecrecy.org/ [12 September 2004]. [Google Scholar]
  31. Schorr, D.  (2003).  The real Enron scandal.  The Christian Science   Monitor. URL: http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0118/p11s03-cods.html [28 October  2003]. [Google Scholar]
  32. Schugurensky, D. (2001). Textbooks, business pressures, and censhorship:  Harold  Rugg and the Robey investigation. History of education: Moments of the 20th century.   URL: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=harold+rugg.  [13  July 2001]. [Google Scholar]
  33. Spring, J.  (1988).  Conflict of Interest: The politics of American   education. New York:  Longman. [Google Scholar]
  34. Spring, J. (1990). The American school: 1642-1990. New York: Longman. Szasz, T. S. (1970).  The manufacture of madness.  New York:  Harper   & Row Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  35. Thomas, G. (2003). Cheney was Bush’s triggerman in escalating intelligence catfight. American Freepress. URL: http://www.apfn.net/Messageboard/7-19-03/discussion.cgi.23.html    [22 October 2004]. [Google Scholar]
  36. Toobin, J. (2003).  End run at Enron.  New Yorker, 10/27, p.   48-55. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tyack D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Total expenditures for education in U.S. URL: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OUS/Budget01/BudgetSumm/apndx-1.html, accessed [8 November  2000]. [Google Scholar]
  39. U.S. Department of Education. (2002).URL: http://pt3.altec.org/grantmanagement/evaluation/strategy.html http://pt3.altec.org/grantmanagement/evaluation/index.html  [25 September 2003]. [Google Scholar]
  40. Welch, M. (2003). Get ready for Patriot Act II. AlterNet.Org. URL: http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15541   [4  December 2004]. [Google Scholar]
  41. Winerip, M. (2003).  The ‘zero dropout’ miracle:  Alas! Alack! A Texas tall   tale. NewYork Times. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/13/education/13EDUC.html?pagewanted=2 &ei=5070&en=3852ac94deaea297&ex=1068872400   [29  September 2005]. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yatvin, J. (2000). Babes in the woods: The wanderings of the National Reading Panel. Phi  Delta Kappan, 83(5), p.  364-369 [Google Scholar]