- Abbit, J., Ophus, J. (2008). What we know about the impacts of webquests: a review of research. AACE Journal, 16(4), 441-456. [Google Scholar]
- Albayati, H. (2020). Approaches, methods in English language teaching: eclectic approach, Global Scientific Journals, 8 (3), 850-857. [Google Scholar]
- Aldalalah, O., M., A., Eyadat, Y., Ababneh, Z., W., M. (2015). Effects of webquest on the achievement and motivation of Jordanian University students of (independent & dependent) cognitive style. World Journal on Educational Technology. 7(2), 119-135. [Google Scholar]
- Alshumaimeri, Y., Almasri, M. M. (2012). The effects of using webquests on reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 11, 295-306. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, G. J., Walberg, H. J. (1974). Learning environments. In H. J. Walberg (ed.), evaluating educational performance: a sourcebook of methods, instruments, and examples (pp. 81–98). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. [Google Scholar]
- Averkieva L., Chayka, Y., Glushkov, S. (2015). Web quest as a tool for increasing students’ motivation and critical thinking development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 137 – 140. [Google Scholar]
- Awada, G., Burston, J., Ghannage, R. (2020). Effect of student team achievement division through WebQuest on EFL students’ argumentative writing skills and their instructors’ perceptions, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 275-300. [Google Scholar]
- Aydinli, J. M., Elaziz, F. (2010). Turkish students' and teachers' attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 235-252. [Google Scholar]
- Behbahani, A. R., Shahbazi, M. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of a digital game-based task on the acquisition of word knowledge, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-26. [Google Scholar]
- Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research, Free Press, Glencoe. [Google Scholar]
- Bogdan, R. C., Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: İntroduction and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
- Brannen, J. (2005). Mixed methods research: a discussion paper, ESRC National Centre for Research http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/89/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-005.pdf NCRM Methods Review Papers. [Google Scholar]
- Brito, C., Mario, B. (2007). Webquests: a tool or a trandisciplinary methodology? Interactive Educational Multimedia, 15, 52-64. [Google Scholar]
- Burke, M., Gurffey S., Colter S., Riehl, J. (2003). Biowebquest: evaluating the effectiveness of a "webquest" model of inquiry learning in a biology sequence for non-science majors. http://www.itc.utk.edu/~burke/syllabus03 obteined from that address. [Google Scholar]
- Buyukozturk, S. (2013). Sosyal bilimler icin veri analizi el kitabi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayincilik. [Google Scholar]
- Canale, M., Swain, M. (1980). Theoratical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. [Google Scholar]
- Chou, C. (2011). An inquiry into the effects of incorporating webquest in an EFL college course. İnternational Conference on Consumer Electronics (s. 1-4). XianNing, China. [Google Scholar]
- Cooksey, R. W. (2020). Media review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 545-547. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Díez, T., Richters, M., Amanda, M. (2020). Podcasting as a tool to develop speaking skills in the foreign language classroom. The EuroCALL Review, 28(1), 40-56. [Google Scholar]
- Djamàa, S. (2020). Lecture in the living room, homework in the classroom: the effects of flipped ınstruction on graduate efl students’ exam performance. Computers in the Schools, 37(3), 141-167. [Google Scholar]
- Dodge, B. (1995). Webquests: a technique for internet-based learning. Distance Educator, 1(2), 10-13. [Google Scholar]
- Dodge, B. (2001). Focus: five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning and Leading with Technology, 28 (8), 6-9. [Google Scholar]
- Drew, P. Ausband, L. (2009). Developing higher-order thinking skills through webquests. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(1), 29-34. [Google Scholar]
- Dudeney, G., Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology? Essex: Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar]
- Ebadi S., Rahimi M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of webquest-based classroom on efl learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: a mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 1–35. [Google Scholar]
- Ebadi, S., Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: a mixed-methods study, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 617-651. [Google Scholar]
- Ebadi, S., Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using google docs, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 527-555. [Google Scholar]
- Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. Crows Nest: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Farenga, S., Ness, D. (Ed). (2005). Encyclopedia of education and human development. New York: M. E. Sharpe. [Google Scholar]
- Fern, E. F. (2001). Advanced Focus Group Research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
- Fievez, I., Montero Perez, M., Cornillie, F., Desmet, P. (2020). Vocabulary learning through viewing captioned or subtitled videos and the role of learner- and word-related factors. Calico Journal, 37(3), 233–253. [Google Scholar]
- Fraser, B. J., D.L.,Fisher. (1982). predictingstudents' outcomes from their perceptions of classroom psychosocial environment. American Educational Research Journal, 19 ( 4) , 498-518. [Google Scholar]
- Gaukrodger B., Atkins C. (2013). Second Life calling: language learners communicating virtually across the world. 30th Ascilite Conference (s. 303-307), Sydney. [Google Scholar]
- Ginaya, G., Rejeki, I., Astuti, N. (2018). The effects of blended learning to students’ speaking ability. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(3), 1−14. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v4i3.661 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Glesne, C. (2014). Nitel arastirmaya giris (4. Baski). A. Ersoy ve P. Yalcinoglu. (Cev. Ed.). Ankara: Ani. [Google Scholar]
- Gravetter, F. J, Forzano, L. B. (2011). Research methods for the behavioural sciences. Cengage Learning, 146. [Google Scholar]
- Hassan R. F., Dzakiria, H., Idrus, R. M. (2016). Using second life platform for improving English language skills: students’ perception. İnternational Review of Management and Marketing, 6, 43-47. [Google Scholar]
- Hickey, G., Kipping, C. (1996). Issues in research. A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Researcher, 4, 81-91. [Google Scholar]
- Hislope, K. (2008). Learning in a virtual world. The International Journal of Learning, 15, 51-58. [Google Scholar]
- Howard, R. M. (2001). Collaborative Pedagogy in G. Tate, A. Rupiper& K. Schick (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogy (pp. 54-70). New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, H. (2013). E-reading and e-discussion: EFL learners' perceptions of an e-book reading program, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26 (3), 258-281. [Google Scholar]
- Irafahmi, D. T. (2016). Creating a ‘real’ WebQuest: Instructional design point of view. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(2), 427−438. [Google Scholar]
- Jacob Cohen (1960), A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol.20, No.1, pp.37-46. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, A. P. (2015). Eylem Arastirmasi El Kitabi. Ani yayincilik, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, S., Won, E. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10 (4), 905. [Google Scholar]
- Kachina, O. A. (2012). Using webquests in the social sciences classroom. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 5(3), 185-200. [Google Scholar]
- Kasper, L. (2000). New technologies, new literacies: focus discipline research and ESL learning communities. Language Learning and Technology, 4(2), 105-128. [Google Scholar]
- Kelly, R. (2000). Working with webquests. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32 (6), 4-13. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, M. K., Gaul, C. Z., Bundrage, C. N., Madathany, R. J. (2020) Technology supported reading comprehension: a design research of the student mental model analyzer for research and teaching (SMART) technology, Interactive Learning Environments [Google Scholar]
- Kobylinski, C. (2014). Student feedback on the effectiveness of using a webquest for an integrative skills course in a Korean University. Contemporary İssues in Education Research, 7, 63-68. [Google Scholar]
- Koenraad, A. L. M. (2002). TalenQuest: WebQuests for modern languages [PDF]. http://www.koenraad.info/CALL obteined from that address. [Google Scholar]
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Krueger, R. A., Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus Gruops: A Practical Guide for Applied Research 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, C. P. (2013). The eclectic method: theory and its application to the learning of english. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(6), 2250-3553. [Google Scholar]
- Lacina, J. (2007). Inquiry-based learning-technology: designing-exploring webquests. Childhood Education, 83(4), 251-252. [Google Scholar]
- Landis, J. R., Koch G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33, 159-74. [Google Scholar]
- Lara, S., Repáraz C. (2007). Effectiveness of cooperative learning fostered by working with webquest. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 731-756. [Google Scholar]
- Lasaten, R. C. (2017). Development and validation of webquests in teaching epics. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(2), 59-66. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, B. J. (2020). Smartphone tapping vs. handwriting: A comparison of writing medium. The EuroCALL Review, 28(1), 15-25. [Google Scholar]
- Leite, R., Vieira, P., Silva, R. M., Neves, T. (2017). The Role of webquests in science education for citizenship. İnteractive Educational Multimedia, 15, 18-36. [Google Scholar]
- Leung, C. B., Unal, Z. (2013). Advantages and disadvantages of classroom instruction with webquests: connecting literacy and technology. Journal of Reading Education, 38(2), 31-38. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, W., Fung, D. (2020). Development and evaluation of a WebQuest-based teaching programme: Students' use of exploratory talk to exercise critical thinking. İnternational journal of educational research, 104, 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101652. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Lin M., Preston A., Kharrufa A., Kong Z. (2016). Making L2 learners’ reasoning skills visible: The potential of computer supported collaborative learning environments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 303–322. [Google Scholar]
- Littlejohn, A. (Ed.). (2003). Reusing online resources: a sustainable approach to e-learning. London: Kogan Page Limited. [Google Scholar]
- Luzón, M. J. (2002). Internet content-based activities for ESP. English Teaching Forum 40(3), 20-25. [Google Scholar]
- MacGregor, S., Lou, Y. (2005). Web-based learning: how task scaffolding website design support knowledge acquisition. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37, 161-175. [Google Scholar]
- Machovikov, A., Stolyarov, K., Chernov, M., Sinclair, I., Machovikova, I. (2002). Computer-based training system for Russian word pronunciation, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1(2), 201-214. [Google Scholar]
- March, T. (2003). The learning power of webquests. Educational Leadership, 61(4), 42-47. [Google Scholar]
- Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). [Google Scholar]
- Mentxaka, İ. (2004). Webquest: internet como recurso didáctico. Alambique, 40, 62-70. [Google Scholar]
- Mills, G. E. (2003). Action Research. A Guide For The Teacher Researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, İnc. [Google Scholar]
- Morgan, D. (2018). Living with blurry boundaries: the values of distinguishing between qualitative and quantitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 268–276. [Google Scholar]
- Orucu, D., Simsek, H. (2011). Educational administration: theory and practice. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi, 17(2), 167-197. [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, N., Pipkin, G. (2001). Guiding readers to new understandings through electronic text. Voices from the Middle, 8(4), 64-66. [Google Scholar]
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd Ed.). London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Pennington, M. C. (1996). Writing the natural way: on computer, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9(2-3), 125-142. [Google Scholar]
- Peterson, M. (2010). Learner participation patterns and strategy use in second life: an exploratory case study. European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 273-292. [Google Scholar]
- Renau, M. L., Pesudo, M. (2016). Analysis of the implementation of a webquest for learning English in a secondary school in Spain. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (İJEDİCT), 12(2), 26-49. [Google Scholar]
- Richards, C. (2005). The design of effective ICT-supported learning activities: exemplary models, changing requirements, and new possibilities. Language Learning and Technology, 9(1), 60-79. [Google Scholar]
- Ruschoff, B. (2009). Output-Oriented Language Learning With Digital Media. In M. Thomas, (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning. Hershey, London & New York: IGI Global Reference. [Google Scholar]
- Sato, T., Murase, F., Burden., T. (2020). An empirical study on vocabulary recall and learner autonomy through mobile assisted language learning in blended learning settings. Calico Journal, 37, 254-276. [Google Scholar]
- Schmid, E. (2006). Investigating the use of interactive whiteboard technology in the English language classroom through the lens of a critical theory of technology, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 47-62. [Google Scholar]
- Shorten, A., Moorley, C. (2014). Selecting the sample. Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(2), 32–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2014-101747. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Shutenko, A. I., Shutenko, E., Ryzhkova, I., Koreneva, A., Sidorova, M., Rotaryanu, L. (2019). The use of WebQuests in foreign language training of students of nonlinguistic specialties, Revista Espacios, 40 (19), 1-7. [Google Scholar]
- Simina V., Hamel, M. J. (2005). Computer application in second language acquisition through a social constructivist perspective: webquest in project-driven language learning. ReCALL, 17(2). 217-228. [Google Scholar]
- Simsek, H., Yildirim, A. (2003). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastirma Yontemleri. Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik. [Google Scholar]
- Starr, L. (2000). Meet Bernie Dodge: The Frank Lloyd Wright. https://www.educationworld.com/a_issues/chat/chat015.shtml obteined from that address. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedurs and Tecniques. Newbury Park, C. A. : Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Strickland, J. (2005). Using webquests to teach content: comparing instructional strategies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 138-148. [Google Scholar]
- Sumtsova, O.V., Azhel, Y. P., Buyankina, A. S. (2016). webquest-based role play as a way of raising students’ motivation to studying foreign languages. iJET, 11(3), 63-66. [Google Scholar]
- Şahin, S. M., Baturay, M. H. (2016). The effect of 5E-learning model supported with WebQuest media on students’ achievement and satisfaction. E-learning and Digital Media,13(3-4), 158-175 [Google Scholar]
- Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, Pearson. [Google Scholar]
- Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 46, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Tozcu, A. (2008). The use of interactive whiteboards in teaching non-roman scripts, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 143-166. [Google Scholar]
- Trajkoska, D. A., Dimov, B. C. (2013). Webquest as a teaching strategy. Journal of Faculty of the Education Bitola, 7(2), 315. [Google Scholar]
- Tseng, S., Yeh, H., Yang, S. (2015). Promoting different reading comprehension levels through online annotations, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 41-57. [Google Scholar]
- Tuan, L. T. (2011). Teaching reading through webquest. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 664-67. [Google Scholar]
- Unal, Z., Bodur, Y., Unal, A. (2012). Choosing or designing the perfect webquest for your learners using a reliable rubric. Contemporary İssues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 209- 231. [Google Scholar]
- Wali, N. H. (2009). Eclecticism and language learning. Al- Fatih Journal. Diyala University-College of Basic Education, 5(39), 289-298. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C., Song, H., Xia, F, Yan, Q. (2009). Integrating second life into an efl program: students´ perspectives. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar]
- Weideman, A. (2001). The old and the new: reconsidering eclecticism in language teaching. linguam, 17(1):1-13. doi.org/10.5785/17-1-131 (PDF) The Eclectic Method to language Teaching: Clarifications and Conceptual Extensions. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331743322_The_Eclectic_Method_to_language_Teaching_Clarifications_and_Conceptual_Extensions [accessed Nov 16 2020]. [Google Scholar]
- White, M. D., Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Library Trends 55(1), 22-45. [Google Scholar]
- X. Lin, N. E. Breslow. (1996) Bias correction in generalized linear mixed models with multiple components of dispersion, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 1007-1016. [Google Scholar]
- Yenmez, A. A., Ozpinar, I., Gokce, S. (2017). Use of webquests in mathematics instruction: academic achievement, teacher and student opinions. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(9), 1554-1570. [Google Scholar]
- Yesi̇lyurt, S, Capraz, C . (2018). Olcek gelistirme calismalarinda kullanilan kapsam gecerligi icin bir yol haritasi. Erzincan Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 20 (1) , 251-264. [Google Scholar]
- Yildirim, A. (1999). Nitel arastirma yontemlerinin temel ozellikleri ve egitim arastirmalarindaki yeri ve onemi. Egitim ve Bilim, 23, 7-17. [Google Scholar]
- Yildirim, A., Simsek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastirma Yontemleri (6. Baski). Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, C. C. (1994). Classroom environment and student affective performance: an effective profile, The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(3), 221-239, DOİ: 10.1080/00220973.1994.9943842 [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods, Newbury Park, CA, SAGE. [Google Scholar]
|