International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210
International Journal of Progressive Education
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(1) 458-474

Society 5.0 in Human Technology Integration: Digital Transformation in Educational Organizations

Zübeyde Yaraş & Fikriye Kanatlı-Öztürk

pp. 458 - 474   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.26   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2107-07-0001.R1

Published online: February 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 358  |  Number of Download: 425

Save PDF

Abstract

In the conducted study, it was aimed to determine the impacts of Society 5.0 on digital transformation in organizations in human technology integration. For this purpose, answers were sought to the questions of changing positions of people in line with changing business conditions, functions of people in the digital world, changing roles of management and managers, expectations of society from managers, how to establish a balance in organizations in the process of technological integration and change. In this research, which was structured in the “phenomenology” pattern within the framework of basic qualitative research, the study group was determined by using the “convenience sampling” method. In this context, the study group of the research consisted of 50 undergraduate students studying at Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Education. As a data collection tool, a semi-structured interview form consisting of five questions was used by the researchers. The data obtained were analysed using the “inductive thematic analysis” method utilize in the analysis of qualitative research. In line with the findings; ıt is among the results that technology affects people’s positions at work, advanced technology products limit people’s functions in society, Society 5.0 creates a need for transformation in the roles of managers, social expectations from managers change in the process of Society 5.0, and organizational balance is crucial for the digital transformation process.

Keywords: Society 5.0, Super-smart Society, Digital Transformation

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Yaras, Z. & Kanatli-Ozturk, F. (2022). Society 5.0 in Human Technology Integration: Digital Transformation in Educational Organizations . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 458-474. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.26

Harvard
Yaras, Z. and Kanatli-Ozturk, F. (2022). Society 5.0 in Human Technology Integration: Digital Transformation in Educational Organizations . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), pp. 458-474.

Chicago 16th edition
Yaras, Zubeyde and Fikriye Kanatli-Ozturk (2022). "Society 5.0 in Human Technology Integration: Digital Transformation in Educational Organizations ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (1):458-474. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.26.
References
  1. Acar, P., & Acar, A. (2019). İşletmelerde uzaktan çalışanların yönetilmesi: Lojistik sektöründe nitel bir alan araştırması. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,12(4), 514-526.  [Google Scholar]
  2. Akben, İ., & Avşar, İ. İ. (2018). Industry 4.0 and lıght out manufacturıng: An overvıew. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi , 3(1) , 26-37 . [Google Scholar]
  3. Akça, M., & Tepe Küçükoğlu, M . (2020). Covıd-19 and ıts effects on busıness lıfe: Work at home. Journal of International Management Educational and Economics Perspectives, 8(1), 71-81. [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Harthi, A. S. A. (2017). Technological self-efficacy among school leaders in Oman: A preliminary study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), 760–772. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 49-82. [Google Scholar]
  6. Annells, M. (2006). Triangulation of qualitative approaches: Hermeneutical phenomenology and grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(1), 55-61. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arı, E. S. (2021). Super Smart Socıety: Socıety 5.0. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1), 455-479. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aydın Göktepe, E. (2020). Management practices for business sustanability during the crisis period; COVID-19 pandemic research. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 6(26), 630-638. [Google Scholar]
  9. Berghaus, S., & Back, A. (2016, October 26).  Stages in digital business transformation: results of an empirical maturity study. MCIS 2016 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2016/22. [Google Scholar]
  10. Berry, G. R. (2011). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams: Understanding why traditional team skills are ınsufficient. Journal of Business Communication, 48(2), 186-206. [Google Scholar]
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.  [Google Scholar]
  12. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digcomp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use, EUR 28558 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.  [Google Scholar]
  13. Chutnic, M., & Grezesik, K. (2009). Leading a virtual intercultural team: Implications for virtual team leaders. Journal of Intercultural Management, 1(1), 82-90. [Google Scholar]
  14. Christensen, L., Johnson, R., & Turner, L. (2015). Araştırma yöntemleri: Desen ve analiz (Çev. Ed. A. Aypay), Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  15. Costa, J. M. (2018, March 5). Sociedade 5.0: A mudança que aí vem (Society 5.0: The change that is coming). https://hrportugal.sapo.pt/sociedade-5-0-a-mudanca-que-ai-vem/. [Google Scholar]
  16. Deguchi, A., Hirai, C., Matsuoka, H. & Nakano, T., Oshima, K., Tai, M., & Tani, S. (2020). What Is Society 5.0?. In: Hitachi-U Tokyo Laboratory (H-UTokyo Lab.) (eds) Society 5.0. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4_1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Deshpande, A. (2018, July 3). How to bring digital transformation to education. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/07/03/how-to-bring-digital transformation-to-education/?sh=29b0b19c5036. [Google Scholar]
  18. Doğan, K., & Arslantekin, S. (2016). Büyük veri: Önemi, yapısı ve günümüzdeki durum. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 56(1), 15-36. [Google Scholar]
  19. Frankiewicz, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2020, May 6). Digital transformation ıs about talent, not technology. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/05/digital-transformation-is-about-talent-not-technology. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fukuyama, M.  (2017, August 6).  Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. https://www.hitachi.com/rev/archive/2017/r2017_06/trends/index.html.  [Google Scholar]
  21. Gohil, S., & Deshpande, P. (2014). A framework to map a practice as organization development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 218-229. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gong, C., & Ribiere, V. (2021). Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation, 102, 1-17.  [Google Scholar]
  23. Gözüküçük, M. (2020). Dijital dönüşüm ve ekonomik büyüme. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İktisat Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  24. Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1-26. [Google Scholar]
  25. Harayama, Y. (2017, August 6). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. https://www.hitachi.com/rev/archive/2017/r2017_06/trends/index.html.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Henriette, E., Feki, M., & Boughzala, I. (2015, December 25). The Shape of Digital Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review. MCIS Proceedings. 10. https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2015/10. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kavi, E. & Koçak, O. (2010). Ethıcal aspect of telecommutıng ın the ınformatıon socıety. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları, 59, 69-88. [Google Scholar]
  28. Keidanren (2016, July 19). In pursuit of an environment for utilization of data- Towards achievement of Society 5.0. https://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2016/054_proposal.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  29. Keidanren (Japan Business Federation) (2016, April 19). Toward realization of the new economy and society. Reform of the economy and society by the deepening of  “Society 5.0”. https://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2016/029_outline.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kıcır, B. (2019). Work from home: Is ıt freedom or captıvıty?. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(1), 173-196.  [Google Scholar]
  31. Mazurek, G. (2019). Transformacja cyfrowa - perspektywa marketingu. Warszawa, Poland: PWN. [Google Scholar]
  32. MEB (2018). 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf.  [Google Scholar]
  33. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  34. Okan Gökten, P. (2018). Manufacturıng ın the dark: Scope of the cost ın the new age. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 20(4), 880-897. [Google Scholar]
  35. Parker, S. K. (2017). That is my job': How employees' role orientation affects their job performance. Human Relations, 60(3), 403-434.   [Google Scholar]
  36. Peters, L. M., & Manz, C. C. (2007). Identifying antecedents of virtual team collaboration. Team Performance Management, 13, 117-129.  [Google Scholar]
  37. Pflaum, A., & Golzer, P. (2018). The IoT and digital transformation: Toward the data-driven enterprise. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 17(1), 87-91. doı:10.1109/MPRV.2018.011591066. [Google Scholar]
  38. Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New challenge of learning. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(5), 92-97. [Google Scholar]
  39. Prasetyo, Y. A., & Arman, A. A. (2017, January 25). Group management system design for supporting Society 5.0 in smart society platform. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI). Bandung, Indonesia: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icitsi.2017.8267977. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Rose, P., Beeby, J., & Parker, D. (1995). Academic rigour in the lived experience of researchers using phenomenological methods in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21(6), 1123-1129. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2648.1995.21061123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  41. Sackmann, S. A., Eggenhofer-Rehart, P. M., & Friesl, M. (2009). Sustainable change: Long-term efforts towarddeveloping a learning organization. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(4), 521–549. [Google Scholar]
  42. Salgues, B. (2018). Society 5.0 ındustry of the future, technologies, methods and tools. London: ISTE Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  43. Saracel, N., & Aksoy, İ. (2020). Society 5.0: Super Smart Society. Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(2), 26-34. [Google Scholar]
  44. Schreckling, E. & Steiger, C. (2017). Digitalize or drown. In G. Oswald and M. Kleinemeier (Eds.) Shaping the digital enterprise (pp. 3-27), Waldorf: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  45. Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2018). Society 5.0: Innovation, uncertainty and social sciences. Management and Organizational Studies, 5(4), 26-31. [Google Scholar]
  46. Skobelev, P.O., & Borovik, S.Y. (2017). On the way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: from digital manufacturing to digital society. Industry 4.0, 2(6), 307–311. [Google Scholar]
  47. Stolterman E., & Fors A.C. (2004) Information Technology and the Good Life. In: Kaplan B., Truex D.P., Wastell D., Wood-Harper A.T., De Gross J.I. (eds) Information Systems Research. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 143. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  48. Sudibjo, N., Idawati, L., & Harsanti, HG.R. (2019). Characteristics of learning in the era of ındustry 4.0 and society 5.0. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 372, 276-278. [Google Scholar]
  49. Teichert, R. (2019). Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(6), 1673-1687. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061673. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  50. Uğurlu Eren, Z. (2020). Toplum 5.0 ve Dijital Dünyada Toplumsal Dönüşüm ve Eğitim 5.0. Akçay, D. and Efe, E. (Eds)., Dijital Dönüşüm ve Süreçler (pp. 169-206). Publisher: İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Yayınları.  [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, F. Y., Yuan, Y., Wang, X., & Qin, R. (2018). Societies 5.0: A new paradigm for computational social systems research. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2018.2797598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  52. We Are Social (2021, January 27). Digital 2021: Global Overview Report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-global-overview-report. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yankın, F. B. (2019). Dijital dönüşüm sürecinde çalışma yaşamı. Trakya Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,7 (2), 1-38. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 18 Issue 1

February 2022

All Articles

International Journal of Progressive Education

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.