International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(3) 1-11

Social Studies for Democracy: Cultivating Communities of Inquiry for Filipino Students as Deliberative Citizens

Abigail Thea Canuto

pp. 1 - 11   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.1   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2107-20-0002

Published online: June 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 76  |  Number of Download: 165


Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the problematic state of Philippine democracy that has long been attributed to the nation’s history of colonial rule, widespread poverty and inequality, oligarchic structures, and dysfunctional institutions.  It focuses on the role of education and Social Studies Education, specifically, in cultivating in Filipino citizens skills and attitudes necessary for active participation in deliberative democracy.  Drawing from Dewey’s philosophy of progressivist and democratic education, Peirce’s notion of community of inquiry, as well as Lipman’s Philosophy for/with Children, it sketches how Social Studies situated in classroom communities of inquiry will help develop communitarian dispositions and inquiry skills that are indispensable in a healthy and vibrant democracy.  While it is recognized that there are numerous other pedagogies that aim at similar purposes, it is argued that the community of inquiry enables a unique and robust learning process that allows students to think reflectively, explore various contexts and experiences, question their assumptions, identify their prejudices, and make their own conclusions through deliberative, intersubjective dialogue.

Keywords: Social Studies, Democratic Education, Philippine Education, Community of Inquiry, Philosophy for/with Children


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Canuto, A.T. (2022). Social Studies for Democracy: Cultivating Communities of Inquiry for Filipino Students as Deliberative Citizens . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(3), 1-11. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.1

Harvard
Canuto, A. (2022). Social Studies for Democracy: Cultivating Communities of Inquiry for Filipino Students as Deliberative Citizens . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(3), pp. 1-11.

Chicago 16th edition
Canuto, Abigail Thea (2022). "Social Studies for Democracy: Cultivating Communities of Inquiry for Filipino Students as Deliberative Citizens ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (3):1-11. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.1.

References
  1. Abellanosa, R. J. (2020 Poverty in a time of pandemic: A critique of Philippine democracy and some imperatives moving forward. Social Ethics Society Journal of Applied Philosophy, Special Issue, 306-332. [Google Scholar]
  2. Accorinti, S. (2000) Philosophy for children. Retrieved from http://www.ffst.hr/ENCYCLOPAEDIA/doku.php?id=philosophy_for_children [Google Scholar]
  3. Baildon, M., Sim, J. B. Y., & Paculdar, A. (2016). A tale of two countries: comparing civic education in the Philippines and Singapore. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(1), 93-115. [Google Scholar]
  4. Banlaoi, R. (2004). Globalization and nation-building in the Philippines: State predicaments in managing society in the midst of diversity. Growth and governance in Asia, 203-214. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernardo, A. B., & Mendoza, R. J. (2009). Makabayan in the Philippine basic education curriculum: Problems and prospect for reforming student learning in the Philippines. In Reforming Learning (pp. 181-197). Springer, Dordrecht. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bleazby, J. (2006) Autonomy, democratic community, and citizenship in philosophy for children: Dewey and philosophy for children’s rejection of the individual/community dualism. Analytic Teaching: The Community of Inquiry Journal, 26(1), 30-52. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bleazby, J. (2009). Philosophy for children as a response to gender problems. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 19(2/3), 70-78. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolaños, M. A. V. (2018). Narrowing the Gap between Theory and Practice: Community of Inquiry and Its State in the Philippines. Kritike, 12(2), 140-156. [Google Scholar]
  9. Calingasan, L. Y. (2018). Factors that Shape and Determine the Social Studies Curriculum in Philippine Basic Education (1980s–2010). Asia Pacific Journal on Curriculum Studies, 1(1). [Google Scholar]
  10. Camhy, D. (2005) Developing dialogue through philosophical inquiry. in Dialogue on Dialogue, A Resource Book for the ‘Developing Dialogue Through Philosophical Enquiry’ Course for Teachers. Produced under the EU Socrates Scheme by the Menon group. [Google Scholar]
  11. Canuto, A. T. (2013). Critical thinking and philosophical progress in dialogues of grade two children in a community of inquiry. Unpublished Master’s thesis.  College of Education, University of the Philippines. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cassidy, C. (2017). Philosophy with Children: a rights-based approach to deliberative participation. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 25(2), 320-334. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chetty, D. (2014) The elephant in the room: picture books, philosophy for children, and racism. Childhood and Philosophy, 10(19), 11-31. [Google Scholar]
  14. Claudio, L. (2017). Liberalism and the postcolony: Thinking the state in 20th-Century Philippines. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Constantino, R. (1970). The miseducation of the Filipino. Journal of contemporary Asia, 1(1), 20-36. [Google Scholar]
  16. Department of Education. K to12 Gabay Pangkurikulum: Araling Panlipunan. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/AP-CG.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and education.  Norwood: The Macmillan Company. [Google Scholar]
  18. Di Masi, D., & Santi, M. (2016). Learning democratic thinking: a curriculum to philosophy for children as citizens. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(1), 136-150. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dizon, A. G. (2020). Content analysis of K to 12 World History teaching guides in terms of teaching approaches. The Normal Lights, 14(2). [Google Scholar]
  20. Dizon, A. G. (2021). Content analysis of the K to 12 Junior High School Geography curriculum in the Philippines. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 1-17. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dressel, B. (2011). The Philippines: how much real democracy?. International Political Science Review, 32(5), 529-545. [Google Scholar]
  22. Elicor, P. P. (2015) I am keeping my cultural hat on: Exploring a ‘culture-enabling’ philosophy for/with children practice. Childhood and Philosophy, 17, 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  23. Facione, P. (2007). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment, California Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www.insightassessment.com/pdf_files/DEXadobe.PDF [Google Scholar]
  24. Fisher, R. (2006) Talking to think: why children need philosophical discussion. in D. Jones and P. Hodson (eds.) Unlocking speaking and listening. London: David Fulton. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gatmaytan, D. B. (2006). It's All the Rage: Popular Uprisings and Philippine Democracy. Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J., 15, 1. [Google Scholar]
  26. Glina, M. (2009) Democracy as morality: using philosophical dialogue to cultivate safe learning communities. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 29(1), 31-38. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gutek, G. L. (1997) Philosophical and ideological perspectives on education (2nd ed.).  Boston: Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  28. Haynes, J. & Murris, K. (2001) Opening up space for children’s thinking and dialogue. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the United Kingdom Reading Association in Canterbury, Kent, UK, July 6-8, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hymers, J. (2009) ‘Little children, ‘big’ questions’: Does mantle of the expert create an environment conducive to philosophical thinking in the early years?.  BA (Hons) thesis.  University of East Anglia School of Health, Social Care and Early Education, City College Norwich. [Google Scholar]
  30. Juuso, H. (2007) Child, philosophy and education—discussing the intellectual sources of philosophy for children.  Published doctoral dissertation: University of Utrecht. Oulu, Finland: Oulu University Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kizel, A. (2015) Philosophy with children, the poverty line, and socio-philosophic sensitivity. Childhood and Philosophy, 11(21), 139-162. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kraft, H. J. S. (2003). The Philippines: the weak state and the global war on terror. Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, 18(1), 133-152. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lat, T. K. A. (2018). Philippine democracy and its discontents: the failed promise of social justice under the 1987 people power constitution. Estudios de Deusto: revista de la Universidad de Deusto, 66(1), 133-158. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee, Z. (2014). Nurturing communities of inquiry in Philippine schools. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 20(3/4), 76-82. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lipman, M. (2003) Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lipman, M. (2004) Philosophy for children’s debt to Dewey, Critical and Creative Thinking, 12, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lipman, M., Sharp, A.M. and Oscanyan, F. (1980) Philosophy in the classroom (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lucman, S. T. (2020). Developing social justice skills through community service-learning in high school social studies. The Councilor: A Journal of the Social Studies, 81(2), 2. [Google Scholar]
  39. Maboloc, C. R. (2017). Situating the Mindanao agenda in the radical politics of President Duterte. Iqra: Journal of the Al Qalam Institute for Islamic Identities and Dialogue in Southeast Asia, 4, 3-24. [Google Scholar]
  40. Maca, M., & Morris, P. (2012). The Philippines, the East Asian ‘developmental states’ and education: a comparative analysis of why the Philippines failed to develop. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(3), 461-484. [Google Scholar]
  41. Makaiau, A. S. (2017). Philosophy for children Hawai’i: A culturally responsive pedagogy for social justice education. in Inclusion, Diversity, and Intercultural Dialogue in Young People’s Philosophical Inquiry. Ching-Ching Lin Touro, and Lavina Sequeira (eds.), Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  42. Makaiau, A. S., & Tanaka, N. (2018). Philosophy for children: A deliberative pedagogy for teaching social studies in Japan and the USA. Journal of International Social Studies, 8(2), 29-54. [Google Scholar]
  43. Miralao, V. A. (2008). A Reflection on Social Transformations and Social Institutions. Philippine Sociological Review, 56, 132-141. [Google Scholar]
  44. Morehouse, R. (2010) Developing communities of inquiry in the USA: retrospect and prospective. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 30(2), 21-31. [Google Scholar]
  45. Murris, K. (2000) Can children do philosophy?.  Journal of Philosophy of Education. 34, 261-279. [Google Scholar]
  46. Nicoll, B. (1993) Critical thinking: developing a critical thinking environment for child development studies. Paper presented at The National Association for the Education of Young Children Conference, November 13, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nishiyama, K. (2019). Rethinking consensus in the community of philosophical inquiry: A research agenda. Childhood and Philosophy, 15, 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  48. Orale, R., & Sarmiento, D. (2016). Senior high school curriculum in the Philippines, USA, and Japan. Journal of Academic Research, 1(3), 12-23. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ordoñez, M. D., & Borja, A. L. (2018). Philippine liberal democracy under siege: The ideological underpinnings of Duterte’s populist challenge. Philippine Political Science Journal, 39(2), 139-153. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pearson, L. (2004) Community and when it is not: reflections in literature. Analytic Teaching: The Community of Inquiry Journal, 23(2), 131-136. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pingul, F. S. (2015). Measuring the impact of a supplemental civic education program on students' civic attitude and efficacy beliefs. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(2), 61-69. [Google Scholar]
  52. Planas, C. C. (2004) The role of the community of inquiry in the process of knowing. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 23(2) 84-96. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sharp, A.M. & Splitter, L.J. (1995) Teaching for better thinking: the classroom community of inquiry.  Melbourne:  The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  54. Šimenc, M. (2009). Citizenship education, philosophy for children and the issue of participation. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 5, 10-26. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sobradil, M. T., Jacobe, A. I., Pandapatan, S. J. M., Porquis, J. M. J., & Casiro, R. B. (2017). Strengthening competence and mentoring the higher school teachers teaching Social Studies based on interdisciplinary approach in the 3rd district of Bukidnon, Northern Mindanao, Philippines. Governance Theory and Practice in Asia Pacific, 47. [Google Scholar]
  56. UNESCO (2007) Philosophy a school of freedom—teaching philosophy and learning to philosophize: status and prospects.  Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Social and Human Sciences Sector. [Google Scholar]
  57. Williams, M. K. (2017). John Dewey in the 21st century. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 9(1), 91-102. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yos, T. (2004) Philosophy for children and the cultivation of good judgment. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(1), 9-16. [Google Scholar]