International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(5) 18-31

Strategies Used by Turkish Teachers in Teaching Comprehension (Reading) in Turkish Lesson Teaching Process

Mustafa Köroğlu & Ahmet Balcı

pp. 18 - 31   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.467.2   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2201-28-0001.R2

Published online: October 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 71  |  Number of Download: 107


Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the strategies used by the 8th grade Turkish teachers in the teaching-learning process of the Turkish lesson for teaching comprehension (reading). The model of the research is the case study model, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The participants of the research are five Turkish teachers who gave eighth grade Turkish lessons in the 2019-2020 academic year and participated in the study voluntarily. "Observation form" and "Semi-structured interview form" developed by the researcher were used as data collection tools in the research. In the development of measurement tools, literature review was used, expert opinion was taken and the level of agreement between coders was checked. Descriptive statistical techniques (frequency, percentage, mean, etc.) were used in the analysis of the data. As a result, it has been determined that the most used strategy by the teachers participating in the study for teaching comprehension in the Turkish lesson learning-teaching process is the question-answer strategy.

Keywords: Reading, Comprehension, Comprehension Strategies, Observation, Comprehension Teaching


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Koroglu, M. & Balci, A. (2022). Strategies Used by Turkish Teachers in Teaching Comprehension (Reading) in Turkish Lesson Teaching Process . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(5), 18-31. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.467.2

Harvard
Koroglu, M. and Balci, A. (2022). Strategies Used by Turkish Teachers in Teaching Comprehension (Reading) in Turkish Lesson Teaching Process . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(5), pp. 18-31.

Chicago 16th edition
Koroglu, Mustafa and Ahmet Balci (2022). "Strategies Used by Turkish Teachers in Teaching Comprehension (Reading) in Turkish Lesson Teaching Process ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (5):18-31. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.467.2.

References
  1. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373. doi:10.1598/RT.61.5.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 40(60), 1063- 1081. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Almasi, J. F., & Fullerton, S. K. (2012). Teaching strategic processes in reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford. [Google Scholar]
  4. Almasi, J. F., Garas-York, K., & Shanahan, L. (2006). Qualitative research on text comprehension and the report of the National Reading Panel. The Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 37-66. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ateş, S. (2011). İlköğretim beşinci sınıf Türkçe dersi öğrenme-öğretme sürecinin anlama öğretimi açısından değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brassell, D., & Rasinski, T. (2008). Comprehension that works: Taking students beyond ordinary understanding to deep comprehension. Teacher Created Materials. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, R. (2008). The road not yet taken: A transactional strategies approach to comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 61(7), 538-547. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 18-37. [Google Scholar]
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Pegem Yayınları: Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and writing, 11(5), 489-503. [Google Scholar]
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dewitz, P., Jones, J., & Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 102-126. dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.2.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dole, J. A., Brown, K. J., & Trathen, W. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 62-88. doi:10.1598/RRQ.31.1.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Duffy, G. G. (2002). The case for direct explanation of strategies. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 28-41). New York, NY: Guilford. [Google Scholar]
  15. Duke, N. K., & Martin, N. M. (2015). Best practices in informational text comprehension instruction. In L. B. Gambrell & L. M. Morrow (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 249-267). New York, NY: Guilford. [Google Scholar]
  16. Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533. [Google Scholar]
  17. Emre, Y. (2014). Farklı akademik seviyedeki 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuma stratejilerini kullanma durumları. Kütahya: Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. [Google Scholar]
  18. Epçaçan, C. (2008). Okuduğunu anlama stratejilerinin bilişsel ve duyuşsal öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi (Yayınlanmamış DoktoraTezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fang, Z., & Coatoam, S. (2013). Disciplinary literacy: What you want to know about it. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(8), 627-632. [Google Scholar]
  20. Frankel, G., Louizos, C., & Austin, Z. (2012). Canadian educational approaches for the advancement of pharmacy practice. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 78(7). [Google Scholar]
  21. Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 3-26). New York, NY: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  22. Janssen, T. (2002). Instruction in self-questioning as a literary reading strategy: An exploration of empirical research. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 2(2), 95-120. [Google Scholar]
  23. Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2010). Reading and teaching short stories, based on process studies and experimental research. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language, and literacy teaching (pp. 45-57). New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  24. Karatay, H. (2007). İlköğretim Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının okuduğunu anlama becerileri üzerine alan araştırması. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. [Google Scholar]
  25. Koenig, K. Q. (2018). How Do Upper Elementary Teachers Teach Informational Text Comprehension Strategies? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno). [Google Scholar]
  26. Luttenegger, K. C. (2012). Explicit Strategy Instruction and Metacognition in Reading Instruction in Preservice Teachers' Elementary School Classrooms. Journal of Reading Education, 37(3). [Google Scholar]
  27. McCown, M., & Thomason, G. (2014). Informational text comprehension: Its challenges and how collaborative strategic reading can help. Reading Improvement, 51(2), 237-253. [Google Scholar]
  28. McIntyre, E., & Hulan, N. (2013). based, culturally responsive reading practice in elementary classrooms: A yearlong study. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52(1), 28-51. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of educational psychology, 94(2), 249-259. [Google Scholar]
  30. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.  [Google Scholar]
  31. Neuman, S. B., & Gambrell, L. B. (2013). Challenges and opportunities in the implementation of Common Core State Standards. In S. B. Neuman & L. B. Gambrell (Eds.), Quality reading instruction in the age of Common Core standards (pp. 1–12). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. [Google Scholar]
  32. Oakhill, J. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less skilled comprehenders' memory for sentences. british Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 13-20. [Google Scholar]
  33. Oakhill, J. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British journal of educational psychology, 54(1), 31-39. [Google Scholar]
  34. Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2000). Children's difficulties in text comprehension: Assessing causal issues. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 51-59. [Google Scholar]
  35. Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2007). Issues of causality in children’s reading comprehension. Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies, 47-71. [Google Scholar]
  36. Palincsar, A. S., & Schutz, K. M. (2011). Reconnecting strategy instruction with its theoretical roots. Theory Into Practice, 50(2), 85-92. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pressley, M., & Allington, R. L. (2015). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York, NY: Guilford. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. Elementary School Journal, 90(1), 3-32. [Google Scholar]
  40. RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Retrieved from http://www .rand.org/pubs/monograph reports/2005/MR 1465.pdf [Google Scholar]
  41. Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Moller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427-463. [Google Scholar]
  42. Stahl, S. S., Jacobson, M.G., Davis, C. E., & Davis, R. L. (1989). Prior knowledge and difficult vocabulary in the comprehension of unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 27-43. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stricklin, K. (2011). Hands‐on reciprocal teaching: A comprehension technique. The Reading Teacher, 64(8), 620-625. [Google Scholar]
  44. Taylor, B., Pearson, P., Peterson, D., & Rodriguez, M. (2003). Reading growth in highpoverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104(1). [Google Scholar]
  45. Temizkan, M. (2007). İlköğretim ikinci kademe Türkçe derslerinde okuma stratejilerinin okuduğunu anlama üzerindeki etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  46. Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), 129-160. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tierney, W. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Teaching qualitative methods in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 17(2), 107-124. [Google Scholar]
  48. Topuzkanamış, E. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının okuduğunu anlama ve okuma stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Balıkesir. [Google Scholar]
  49. Uyar, Y. (2015). Öz düzenlemeye dayalı okuma becerisinin geliştirilmesi ve anlamaya etkisi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., & Willoughby, T. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction for middle and high schools. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]