International Journal of Progressive Education
ISSN (Print): 2834-7919 - ISSN (Online): 1554-5210

Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(5) 279-300

Determining the Changes in the Cognitive Structures of Ecology-Based Natural Education Participants through the Word Association

Sema Nur Güngör, Elif Özata Yücel, Dilek Zeren Özer & Muhlis Özkan

pp. 279 - 300   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.467.17

Publish Date: October 01, 2022  |   Single/Total View: 166/502   |   Single/Total Download: 215/694

PDF Download

Abstract

This study aims to determine the changes in the cognitive structures of the 35 participants after ecology-based nature education in Bursa Uludag and its vicinity. This study used a single group pretest-posttest experimental mode where the data was collected by a word association test. It included the key concepts of nature, national parks, biodiversity, ecosystem, and environmental problems. The analyzed data determined that ecology-based nature education strengthened the cognitive structures of the participants regarding the key concepts. It was also concluded that the participant's awareness of the destruction of nature and the importance of nature protection had increased. The research results show that such education programs, providing one-to-one interaction with nature, help participants to understand nature and natural holistic cycles correctly, thus encouraging its protection.

Keywords: Nature Education, Teacher, Cognitive Structure

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Gungor, S.N., Yucel, E.O., Ozer, D.Z., & Ozkan, M. (2022). Determining the Changes in the Cognitive Structures of Ecology-Based Natural Education Participants through the Word Association. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(5), 279-300. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.467.17

Harvard
Gungor, S., Yucel, E., Ozer, D. and Ozkan, M. (2022). Determining the Changes in the Cognitive Structures of Ecology-Based Natural Education Participants through the Word Association. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(5), pp. 279-300.

Chicago 16th edition
Gungor, Sema Nur, Elif Ozata Yucel, Dilek Zeren Ozer and Muhlis Ozkan (2022). "Determining the Changes in the Cognitive Structures of Ecology-Based Natural Education Participants through the Word Association". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (5):279-300. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.467.17

References
  1. Akay, C. (2013). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin yaparak-yaşayarak öğrenme temelli TÜBİTAK 4004 bilim okulu projesi sonrası bilim kavramına yönelik görüşleri. [The opinions of the secondary school students towards science concept following TÜBİTAK 4004 “Learning by doing summer science school] Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 326-338. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akınoğlu, O. & Sarı, O. (2009). Environmental education in primary school curriculum. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 30, 5-29. [Google Scholar]
  3. Avcı, E., Özenir, Ö. S., Kurt, M. & Atik, S. (2015). TÜBİTAK 4004 Doğa eğitimi ve bilim okulları kapsamında ortaokul öğrencilerine yönelik gerçekleştirilen “Bizim Deniz Akdeniz” projesinin değerlendirilmesi. [Assessment of “Bizim Deniz Akdeniz” Project planned for secondary school students financed by TUBITAK Under 4004 nature and science schools program]. Amasya University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 4(2), 312-333. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayas, A. (2005). Kavram Öğrenimi (Learning Concept). In Çepni, S. (Ed.) Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretimi (Taching science and technology) p 65-90. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ajiboye, J. O. & Olatundun, S. A. (2010). Impact of some environmental education outdoor activities on Nigerian primary school pupils’ environmental knowledge. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 9(3), 149-158. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bahar, M., & Özatlı, N.S. (2003). Investigation of the first year high school students’ cognitive structures in the subject of basic components of living things through word association test. Balıkesir University, Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Sutcliffe, R. G. (1999). Investigation of students' cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 134–141. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakioğlu, B. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2017). A study on developing a guide material for science classes supported by out-of-school learning, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 773-786. [Google Scholar]
  9. Balçın, M. D. & Yavuz Topaloğlu, M. (2018). Okul dışı öğrenme ortamlarında ilkokul öğrencilerinin mühendislere ve bilim insanlarına yönelik algılarının incelenmesi: Bilim merkezi örneği. Sınıfdışı Öğrenme Sempozyumu 11-14 Eylül 2018, Ege Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi [Google Scholar]
  10. Balkan Kıyıcı, F., Atabek Yiğit, E. & Selcen Darçın E. (2014). Investigation of pre-service teacher’s opinion and environmental literacy level change with nature education. Trakya University Journal of Education, 4(1), 17-27. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2008). An experience for the lifelong journey: The long-term effect of a class visit to a science center. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 198-212. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A., & Feder, M.A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington DC: National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bilton, H. (2010). Outdoor learning in the early years: Management and innovation. (3. Ed.). NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bogner, F. X. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29 (4), 17-29. [Google Scholar]
  15. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (28. baskı). Ankara: Pegem. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cardellini, L. & Bahar, M. (2000). Monitoring the learning of chemistry through word association tests. Australian Chemistry Resource Book, 19, 59-69. [Google Scholar]
  17. Coyle, K. J. (2010). ‘Back to school: Back outside’. How outdoor education and outdoor school time create high performance students. National Wildlife Federation. Erişim tarihi: 30 Temmuz 2019, https://www.nwf.org/~/media/PDFs/Be%20Out%20There/Back%20to%20School%20full%20report.ashx [Google Scholar]
  18. Chawla, L. (2018). Nature-based learning for studentachievement and ecological citizenship. In Bohan, C. H. & Tenam Zemach, M.(Eds.), Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 20 (1&2) (ppp. xxv- xxxix). United States of America:Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  19. Christensen, L.B., Johnson, R, B., & Turner, L.A. (2020). Research Methods: Design and Analysis (13th ed.). Pearson [Google Scholar]
  20. Cure, S., Hill, A. & Cruickshank, V. (2018). Mistakes, risk, and learning in outdoor education. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21 (2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-018-0012-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Çağlar Karapınar, B. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının doğa eğitimi hakkında metaforik algıları. [The metaphorical perceptions of social science preservice teachers about nature education]. Master thesis. Aksaray University, Institute of Social Sciences, Aksaray. [Google Scholar]
  22. Çepel, N. (2006). Ekoloji, Doğal Yaşam Dünyaları ve İnsan. [Ecology, Naturel worlds and human]. Ankara: Palme Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  23. Demircioğlu, G. & Aslan, A. (2018). Türkiye’de Okul Dışı Ortamları İle İlgili Yapılmış Lisansüstü Tezlerin İncelenmesi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16 379-402. [Google Scholar]
  24. Diekmann, A. & Peter P. (1998). “Environmental Behavior.” Rationality and Society, 10(1), 79-103. [Google Scholar]
  25. Doğan, M. (2007). Orta öğretimde çevre eğitimi. İçinde: “Çevre Eğitimi” [Environmental education in secondary education. Inside: Environmental education]. Türkiye Çevre Vakfı Yayını No: 178, Ankara, 59-68. [Google Scholar]
  26. Drissner, J., Haase, H.M. & Hille, K. (2010). Short-term environmental education: Does it work? An evaluation of the ‘green classroom’. Journal of Biological Education 44(4), 149–55. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dunlap. R., & Heffernan. R. (1975). Outdoor recreation and environmen- tal concern: An empirical examination. The Journal of Rural Sociology, 40(1), 18-30. [Google Scholar]
  28. Eaton, D. (2000). Cognitive and affective learning in outdoor education. Dissertation Abstracts International – Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 10-A, 3595. [Google Scholar]
  29. Erentay, N. & Erdoğan, M. (2012). 22 adımda doğa eğitimi. [Nature education in 22 steps]. Ankara: ODTÜ Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  30. Genc, M., Genc, T. & Goc Rasgele, P. (2018). Effects of nature-based environmental education on the attitudes of 7th grade students towards the environment and living organisms and affective tendency, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27 (4), 326-340. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535-549. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gunston, R. F. (1980). Word association and the description of cognitive structure. Research in Science Education, 10, 45-53. [Google Scholar]
  33. Güler, T. (2009). The effects of an ecology based environmental education on teachers’ opinions about environmental education. Education and Science, 34(151). [Google Scholar]
  34. Gülay Ogelman, H. & Durkan, N. (2014). Toprakla buluşan çocuklar: Küçük çocuklar için toprak eğitimi projesinin etkililiği. [Children meeting with the soil: efficiency of soil education project for young children ]. The Journal of International Social Research, 7(31), 632-638. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gülay Ogelman, H., Önder, A., Durkan, N. & Erol, A. (2015). Investigation of the efficiency of “We are learning about the soil with Tipitop and His Friends 6” entitled soil education project. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 1 (2), 476-488. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gürsoy, G. (2018). Outdoor Learning Environments In Science Education. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 13(11), 623-649. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  37. Gowin, D. B. (1981). Educating. Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Geisler, C., Martinson, O., & Wilkening, E. (1977). Outdoor recreation and environmental concern. The Journal of Rural Sociology, 42, 241-249. [Google Scholar]
  39. Haktanır, G. (2007). Okul öncesi dönemde çevre eğitimi. içinde: “Çevre Eğitimi” [Environmental education in preschool period. Inside: Environmental education]. Türkiye Çevre Vakfı Yayını No: 178, Ankara, 11-34. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hale, M. (ed.) (1993). Ecology in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hansen, A.S. & Sandberg, M. (2019). Reshaping the outdoors through education: exploring the potentials and challenges of ecological restoration education. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-019-00045-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  42. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Marathe, S. & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice Understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307-331 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hovardas, T. & Korfiatis, K.J. (2006). Word associations as a tool for assessing conceptual change in science education. Learning and Instruction, 16, 416-432. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hungerford, H. R., & Peyton, R. B. (1978). Teaching environmental education. Portland, MN. Weston Walch. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21 (3), 8-22. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jordan, R., Singer, F., Vaughan, J. & Berkowitz, A. (2008). What should every citizen know about ecology? Front Ecol Environment, 7(9), 495–500, doi:10.1890/070113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. Janssen, W. (1988). Naturerleben [Experience of nature]. Unterricht Biologie, 137, 2-7. [Google Scholar]
  48. Jung, N. (2009). Ganzheitlichkeit in der umweltbildung: interdisziplina ¨re konzeptualisierung [Holistical environmental education: Interdisciplinary conceptualisation]. In Informelles lernen und bildung fu ¨r eine nachhaltige entwicklung. Beitra ¨ge aus theorie und praxis, ed. M. Brodowski, U. DeversKanoglu, B. Overwien, M. Rohs, S. Salinger, and M. Walser, 129–49. Opladen: B. Budrich. [Google Scholar]
  49. Karpudewan, M., Roth, W. M., & Abdullah, M. N. S. B. (2015). Enhancing primary school students' knowledge about global warming and environmental attitude using climate change activities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 31-54. [Google Scholar]
  50. Keleş, Ö., Uzun, N. & Varnacı Uzun, F. (2010). The change of teacher candidates‟ environmental consciousness, attitude, thought and behaviors with nature training project and the assessment of its permanence. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 9(32), 384-401. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kışoğlu, M. (2009). Öğrenci merkezli öğretimin öğretmen adaylarının çevre okuryazarlığı düzeyine etkisinin araştırılması.[ Öğrenci merkezli öğretimin öğretmen adaylarının çevre okuryazarlığı düzeyine etkisinin araştırılması]. Doctoral thesis, Atatürk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Biology Teaching, Erzurum. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kibert, N., C. (2000). An Analysis of The Correlations Between The Attitude, Behavior, and Knowledge Components of Environmental Literacy in Undergraduate University Students. Unpublished Master Thesis, The Graduate School Of The University Of Florida, University Of Florida. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kuhlemeier, H., Huub V.D.B. & Nijs L.(1999). Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes and Behavior in Dutch Secondary Education. Journal of Environmental Education. 30(2), 4-14. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aksu, Ö. & Aktaş, M. (2013). Determining cognitive structure and alternative conceptions on the concept of reproduction (The case of pre-service biology teachers). Creative Education, 4(9), 572-587. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kossack, A. & Bogner, F.X. (2012). How does a one-day environmental education programme support individual connectedness with nature? Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 180-187, DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2011.634016 [Google Scholar]
  56. Köse, S., Gencer, A.S., Gezer, K., Erol, G. H. & Bilen, K. (2011). Investigation of undergraduate students’ environmental attitudes. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 1(2), 85-96. [Google Scholar]
  57. Leong, L.Y.C., Fischer, R. & McClure, J. (2014). Are nature lovers more innovative? The relationship between connectedness with nature and cognitive styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology 40, 57-63. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lewin-Benham, A. (2006). "One Teacher, 20 Preschoolers, and a Goldfish." Young Children, March, 2006, 28-34. [Google Scholar]
  59. Malone, K. & Tranter, P. (2003). Children’s environmental learning and the use, design and management of schoolgrounds. Children, Youth and Environments, 13(2), 1-30. [Google Scholar]
  60. Maloney, M., Ward, M., & Braucht, N. (1975). A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 30, 787-790. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mayer, F.S. & McPherson Frantz, C. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 503–15. [Google Scholar]
  62. Meydan, A., Bozyiğit, R. & Karakurt, M. (2012). Ecology-based nature education projects participatory levels of meeting expectations. Marmara Geographical Review, 25, 238-255. [Google Scholar]
  63. Morag, O., & Tal, T. (2012). Assessing learning in the outdoors with the field trip in natural environments (FiNE) framework. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 745-777. [Google Scholar]
  64. Morentin, M., & J. Guisasola. (2015). Primary and secondary teachers’ ideas on school visits to science centres in the Basque Country. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 191-214. [Google Scholar]
  65. Mygind, E. (2009). A comparison of childrens’ statements about social relations and teaching in the classroom and in the outdoor environment. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 9(2), 151–69. [Google Scholar]
  66. Nakiboğlu, C. (2008). Using word associations for assessing non major science students’ knowledge structure before and after general chemistry instruction: the case of atomic structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 9, 309-322. [Google Scholar]
  67. NAAEE (2010). Early childhood environmental education programs: Guidelines for excellence. Washington, D.C.: North American Association for Environmental Education. [Google Scholar]
  68. Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M. & Murphy, S.A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–40. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ok, G. (2016). Doğa eğitimi etkinliklerinin ilköğretim öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik tutum ve bilgi düzeylerine etkisi. [The effect of nature educatıon actıvıtıes on the prımary school students’ knowledge and attıtudes towards envıronment]. Doctoral thesis. Dokuz Eylül University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Biology Teaching, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  70. O’Brien, L. & Murray, R. (2007). Forest school and its impact on young children: Case studies in Britain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 249–65. [Google Scholar]
  71. Özata Yücel, E. & Özkan, M. (2015). Determination of secondary school students' cognitive structure, and misconceptions in ecological concepts through word association test. Edcational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 660-674. [Google Scholar]
  72. Özata Yücel, E. & Özkan, M. (2018). Analysis of change in the environmental perceptions of prospective science teachers: A longitudinal study. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(1), Article 3. [Google Scholar]
  73. Özdemir, O. (2010). The effects of nature-based environmental education on environmental perception and behavior of primary school students. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 27, 125-138. [Google Scholar]
  74. Özerbaş, M. A. (2011). Yaratıcı düşünme öğrenme ortamının akademik başarı ve bilgilerin kalıcılığa etkisi. [The effect of creative thinking teaching environment on academic achievement and retention of knowledge]. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 31(3), 675-705. [Google Scholar]
  75. Özkan, Ö., Tekkaya, C. & Geban, Ö. (2004). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of ecological concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13(1), 95-105. doi: 1059-0145/04/0400-0095/0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  76. Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 32-36. doi:10.1080/00958960009598649 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  77. Pfundt, H. & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students' alternative frameworks and science education (4th edition), Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel. [Google Scholar]
  78. Phenice, L. A. & Griffore, J. P. (2003). Young children and the natural world. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(2), 167-171. [Google Scholar]
  79. Rickinson, M. (2001). ‘Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence’. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207-320. [Google Scholar]
  80. Plate, R. (2010). Assessing individuals’ understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 26(1), 19-33. [Google Scholar]
  81. Sadık, F. & Çakan, H. (2010). Biyoloji bölümü öğrencilerinin çevre bilgisi ve çevre sorunlarına yönelik tutum düzeyleri. [The attitudes of students’ at the department of biology for environmental knowledge and environmental problems]. Journal of Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 19(1), 351-365. [Google Scholar]
  82. Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61-78). Boston: Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sevinç, V., Balkan Kıyıcı, F., Sevinç Altaş, S., & Altınöz, N. (2010). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının çevre okuryazarlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. International Conferance New Horizons in Education, KKTC. [Google Scholar]
  84. Shepardson, D.P, Wee, B., Priddy, M., & Harbor, J. (2007). Students' mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2),327–348. [Google Scholar]
  85. Shavelson, R. J. (1974). Methods for examining representations of a subject‐matter structure in a student's memory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(3), 231-249 [Google Scholar]
  86. Sia, A., Hungerford, H., & Tomera, A. (1985). Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(2), 3 1-40. [Google Scholar]
  87. Singh, P. (2011). Developing a community of thinking: Assessment of environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 17(1), 113-123. [Google Scholar]
  88. Sturm, H. & Bogner, F. X. (2010). Learning at Workstations in Two Different Environments: A Museum and A Classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36, 14-19. [Google Scholar]
  89. Tatar, N. & Bağrıyanık, K. E. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretmenlerinin okul dışı eğitime yönelik görüşleri. İlköğretim Online, 11(4), 883-896. [Google Scholar]
  90. Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental Education Research, 1 (2), 195-212. [Google Scholar]
  91. Tidball, K. G. & Krasny, M. E. (2011). Toward an ecology of environmental education and learning. Ecosphere, 2(2), Article 21 [Google Scholar]
  92. Thomas, G.J. (2018). Pedagogical frameworks in outdoor and environmental education. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21 (2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-018-0014-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  93. Thomas, G., Grenon, H., Morse, M. et al. (2019). Threshold concepts for Australian university outdoor education programs: findings from a Delphi research study. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 22 (3), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-019-00039-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  94. Tsai, C.C., & Huang, C.M. (2002). Exploring students' cognitive structures in learning science: a review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 163-169. [Google Scholar]
  95. Tuncer, G., Tekkaya, G., Sungur, S., Çakıroğlu, J. & Şahin, E. (2008). Environmental literacy of future teachers as a key for sustainable future. XIII. IOSTE, September 21-26, İzmir. [Google Scholar]
  96. UNESCO-UNEP, (1977). Intergovernmental conference on environmental education final report. 14-26 November 1977, Tibilisi, retrived from http://www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/EE-Tbilisi_1977.pdf [Google Scholar]
  97. Urban, D. (1986). Was ist UmweltbewuRtsein? Exploration eines mehrdimensionalen Einstellungskonstrukts [What is environmental perception? Exploration of a multidimensional attitude scale]. Zeitschrifi fur Soziologie, 15, 363-377. [Google Scholar]
  98. Weiss, H.B., Coffman, J., Post, M., Bouffard, S. & Little, P. (2005). Beyond the classroom: Complementary learning to improve achievement outcome. The Evaluation Exchange XI (1). [Google Scholar]
  99. Wilson, R. (2008). Nature and young children: Encouraging creative play and learning in natural environments. New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 18 (5)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 18 Issue 5

October 2022

All Manuscript

International Journal of Progressive Education

Copyright © 2025 International Journal of Progressive Education.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website were created using the BOQ™ - Intelligent Webverse System.