International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(5) 314-332

Revealing Pre-service Teachers’ Mind Maps on STEM Education through STEM Images

Aslı Koçulu, Sefika Girgin & Unsal Umdu Topsakal

pp. 314 - 332   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2109-15-0002

Published online: October 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 149  |  Number of Download: 353


STEM education (based on the integration of the science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines) has recently been an integral part of education system and curriculum in many countries aiming to be more technologically competitive in this age of innovation. While the importance of STEM education has gradually increasing in education system with the complexities of today’s world, revealing pre-service teachers’ mind maps on STEM education and preparing them for STEM education is a crucial issue since the readiness of the teachers affects the quality of education. In this context, the aim of this study is to reveal pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ mind maps on STEM Education through STEM images. The research group consists of 6 pre-service teachers (3 of them are pre-service science teachers (PST) and 3 of them are pre-service mathematics teachers (PMT)) who are 4th grade level students from a public university in Istanbul, Turkey. In current research, case study design was used. The data of study were collected through drawings and focus group discussion. The data were analyzed with thematic analysis through Integrated Teaching (IT) Framework. As a result, 41 codes about pre-service teachers’ mind maps on STEM education were determined under 14 categories of 5 themes of IT Framework. The results of this study are crucial in terms of having potential to guide educational policy makers, curriculum developers, researchers and in-service and pre-service teachers about STEM education.

Keywords: Mind Maps on STEM Education; Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers; Pre-Service Science Teachers; STEM Education; STEM Images

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Koculu, A., Girgin, S. & Topsakal, U.U. (2022). Revealing Pre-service Teachers’ Mind Maps on STEM Education through STEM Images . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(5), 314-332. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.467.19

Koculu, A., Girgin, S. and Topsakal, U. (2022). Revealing Pre-service Teachers’ Mind Maps on STEM Education through STEM Images . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(5), pp. 314-332.

Chicago 16th edition
Koculu, Asli, Sefika Girgin and Unsal Umdu Topsakal (2022). "Revealing Pre-service Teachers’ Mind Maps on STEM Education through STEM Images ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (5):314-332. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.467.19.

  1. Aina, J. K., Aboyeji, O. O. & Aboyeji, D. O., (2015). An investigation of authentic learning experience of pre-service teachers in a Nigerian college of education. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 3(4): 54-63. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akaygün, S. & Aslan Tutak, F. (2016). STEM images revealing stem conceptions of pre service chemistry and mathematics teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 56–71. [Google Scholar]
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1990). The Nature of Science. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  4. Asghar, A., Ellington, R. , Rice, E. , Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM Education in Secondary Science Contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2). Available at:  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Aşık, G., Doğança Küçük, Z., Helvacı, B. & Corlu, M. S., (2017). Integrated teaching project: A sustainable approach to teacher education. Turkish Journal of Education, 6(4): 200-215. [Google Scholar]
  6. Atkinson, R. D., & Mayo, M. J. (2010). Refueling the US innovation economy: Fresh approaches to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  7. Bell, D. (2016). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: a phenomenographic study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26 (1). pp. 61-79. ISSN 0957-7572 DOI [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Brown, J., Brown R. & Merrill, C., (2011). Science and technology educators’ enacted curriculum: areas of possible collaboration for an integrative STEM approach in public schools. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 71(4): 30-34. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35. [Google Scholar]
  11. Creswell, J. W., (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research design: Choosing among Five Approaches, Second edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  12. Corlu, M. S. (2014). FeTeMM eğitimi makale çağrı mektubu [Call for STEM education research in the Turkish context]. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(1), 4-10. [Google Scholar]
  13. Corlu, M. S. (2017). STEM: Bütünleşik Öğretmenlik Çerçevesi [STEM: Integrated Teaching Framework]. In M. S. Corlu & E. Çallı (Eds.), STEM Kuram ve Uygulamaları (pp. 1–10). İstanbul: Pusula. [Google Scholar]
  14. Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M. & Capraro, M. M., (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171): 74-85. [Google Scholar]
  15. Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Corlu, M. A. (2015). Investigating the mental readiness of pre-service teachers for integrated teaching. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 17-28.   [Google Scholar]
  16. Dare, E.A., Ring-Whalen, E.A & Roehrig, G.H. (2019). Creating a continuum of STEM models: Exploring how K-12 science teachers conceptualize STEM education, International Journal of Science Education, 41:12, 1701-1720, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1638531 [Google Scholar]
  17. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Second edition, Sage, Los Angeles. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ejiwale, J. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education. Journal of Education and Learning. Vol.7 (2) pp. 63-74.  [Google Scholar]
  19. English, L. D. (2015). STEM: Challenges and opportunities for mathematics education. In Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Vol. 1, pp. 4-18). PME. [Google Scholar]
  20. Eroğlu, S., & Bektaş, O. (2016). Ideas of Science Teachers took STEM Education about STEM based Activities. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education. 4(3), 43-67. [Online] DOI :10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c3s3m [Google Scholar]
  21. Frith, H. & Gleeson, K. (2004). Clothing and Embodiment: Men Managing Body Image and Appearance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 5(1), p. 40.   [Google Scholar]
  22. Fioriello, P. (2010). Understanding the basics of STEM education. Retrieved from  [Google Scholar]
  23. George-Jackson, C. E. (2011). STEM switching: Examining departures of undergraduate women in STEM fields. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(2), 149–171. [Google Scholar]
  24. Griffith, A.L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review 29, 911– 922. [Google Scholar]
  25. Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers' implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., Chen, T. W., & de Miranda, M. A. (2014). Connecting the STEM dots: measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 107-120. [Google Scholar]
  27. Herrington, J. & Oliver, R., (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3): 23-48. [Google Scholar]
  28. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Committee on Integrated STEM Education; National Academy of Engineering; National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lantz, H.B. (2009). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: What form? What function? Retrieved from:  [Google Scholar]
  30. Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & VílchezGonzález, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799–822. [Google Scholar]
  31. McDonald, C. V. (2016). STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International (27)4, 530-569. [Google Scholar]
  32. Merrill, C. (2009). The future of TE masters degrees: STEM. Presentation at the 70th Annual International Technology Education Association Conference, Louisville, Kentucky. [Google Scholar]
  33. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  34. Mims, C., (2003). Authentic Learning: A practical introduction & guide for implementation Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 6(1): 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  35. Morrison J. (2006). TIES STEM Education Monograph  Series. Attributes of STEM Education. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  36. Nadelson, L. S., Seifert, A., Moll, A. J., & Coats, B. (2012). i-STEM Summer Institute: An Integrated Approach to Teacher Professional Development in STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 13(2), 69-83. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nadelson, L.S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P.  Hay, A.,  Dance, M. & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106:2, 157-168, DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2012.667014. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nathan, M. J., Tran, N. A., Atwood, A. K., Prevost, A., & Phelps, L. A. (2010). Beliefs and expectations about engineering preparation exhibited by high school science, mathematics, and technical education teachers. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 409–436. [Google Scholar]
  39. National Research Council (NRC). (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [Google Scholar]
  40. National Science Board. (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. (Publication No. NSB-07-114). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. [Google Scholar]
  41. Owens, D.C., Sadler, T.D., Murakami, C.D. & Tsai, C.L. (2018). Teachers’ views on and preferences for meeting their professional development needs in STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 118: 370–384. DOI: 10.1111/ssm.12306. [Google Scholar]
  42. Radloff, J. & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating Pre-service STEM Teacher Conceptions of STEM Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 759–774. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444–467. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rinke, C. R., Gladstone-Brown, W., Kinlaw, C. R., & Cappiello, J. (2016). Characterizing STEM Teacher Education: Affordances and Constraints of Explicit STEM Preparation for Elementary Teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 300-309. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26. [Google Scholar]
  46. Savin-Baden, M. and Howell Major, C. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice, New York: Routledge. ISBN: 978-0415674782. [Google Scholar]
  47. Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 66(3-4), 175–183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  48. Stubbs, E.A. and Myers, B.E (2016). Part of What We Do: Teacher Perceptions of STEM Integration. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(3), 87-100. doi: 10.5032/jae.2016.03087. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  49. Sümen, Ö.Ö. & Çalışıcı, H. (2016). Pre service Teachers Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental Literacy Course. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 459–476. [Google Scholar]
  50. Uğraş, M. & Genç, Z. (2018). Investigating preschool teacher candidates' STEM teaching intention and the views about STEM education. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(2), 724-744. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H. and Park, M. S. (2011). STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice.  Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER): (1)2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  52. Wang, H.H., Charoenmuang, M. Knobloch, N.A., & Tormoehlen, R.L. (2020). Defining interdisciplinary collaboration based on high school teachers’ beliefs and practices of STEM integration using a complex designed system. International Journal of STEM Education,7,3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  53. Wong, V., Dillon, J., & King, H. (2016). STEM in England: meanings and motivations in the policy arena, International Journal of Science Education, 38:15, 2346-2366, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1242818. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yang, X., & Gao, C. (2019). Missing Women in STEM in China: an Empirical Study from the Viewpoint of Achievement Motivation and Gender Socialization. Research in Science Education.  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  55. Yin, R. K., (2013). Case study research: Design and methods, Fifth edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]