International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2018, Vol. 14(1) 130-147

Developing Culturally Relevant Literacy Assessments for Bahamian Children

Gertrude Tinker Sachs, Annmarie P. Jackson, Tarika Sullivan & Kamania Wynter –Hoyte

pp. 130 - 147   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.10

Published online: February 11, 2018  |   Number of Views: 362  |  Number of Download: 1047


Abstract

The strong presence of culturally relevant materials in classrooms is seen as an indicator of good teaching but the development and use of these materials is under-investigated. Similarly, the actual construction and use of culturally relevant materials for literacy assessment purposes is under-reported. This paper examines the development and field-testing of culturally appropriate reading assessment materials for primary-school children in the Bahamas. The construction of culturally relevant assessment materials relies on the deep and intimate knowledge of the context and the use of the materials involves analyses from several perspectives: estimation of readability levels, creation of a range of question and activity types, analyses of students’ performance and comparison with other literacy performance indicators. This paper describes the development and field-testing of culturally relevant materials in the Bahamas.

Keywords: Culturally relevant materials; culturally relevant assessment; developing culturally relevant materials; culturally relevant pedagogy in the Bahamas


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Sachs, G.T., Jackson, A.P., Sullivan, T. & –Hoyte, K.W. (2018). Developing Culturally Relevant Literacy Assessments for Bahamian Children. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), 130-147. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.10

Harvard
Sachs, G., Jackson, A., Sullivan, T. and –Hoyte, K. (2018). Developing Culturally Relevant Literacy Assessments for Bahamian Children. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), pp. 130-147.

Chicago 16th edition
Sachs, Gertrude Tinker, Annmarie P. Jackson, Tarika Sullivan and Kamania Wynter –Hoyte (2018). "Developing Culturally Relevant Literacy Assessments for Bahamian Children". International Journal of Progressive Education 14 (1):130-147. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.10.

References
  1. Anderson, R. C. (2004). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning and memory. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 594-606). (5th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. [Google Scholar]
  2. Au, K., & Jordan, C. (1981). Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a culturally appropriate solution. In H. T. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie & K. Au (Eds.), Culture and the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography (pp.139-152). Rowley, MA: Newbury. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahamas. Department of Statistics. (2013). South Abaco population by settlements and occupied dwellings: Census 2010. Retrieved from: http://statistics.bahamas.gov.bs/key.php?cmd=view&id=335  ?? South Abaco data? [Google Scholar]
  4. Bahamas. Ministry of Education. (2010). The examination system in the Bahamas: The Bahamas General Certificate of Secondary Education (BGCSE). Retrieved from: http://bahamaseducation.com/PDF/Docs/THE%20EXAMINATION%20SYSTEM%20IN%20THE%20BAHAMAS.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. Banks, J. A. & McGee Banks, C. A. (2013). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. (8th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bransford, J.D. (2004). Schema activation and schema acquisition: Comments on Richard C. Anderson’s remarks.  In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 607-619). (5th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, E. F. (1975). Bibliotherapy and its widening applications. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cash, P., Gordon, S. & Saunders, G. (1991). Sources of Bahamian history. London: Oxford. MacMillan. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. [Google Scholar]
  11. Césaire, A. (1955). Discourse on colonialism. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Childs, B. & Wolfram, W. (2008). Bahamian English: Phonology. In E. W. Schneider (Ed.), Varieties of English. The Americas and the Caribbean (pp. 239-255). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  13. Code, L. (1993). Taking subjectivity into account. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 15-48). New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cunningham, P. M. (1976). Teachers’ correction responses to black-dialect miscues which are non-meaning-changing. Reading Research Quarterly, 12, 637-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747445 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dale, E. & Chall, J. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11-20. [Google Scholar]
  16. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Delpit, L. (Ed.). (2002). The skin that we speak: Thoughts on language and culture in the classroom. New York, NY: The New Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dubois, W. E. B. (1969). The souls of black folk. New York, NY: Penguin. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Crow’s Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fanon, F. (1952).  Black skin, white masks.  New York, NY: Grove. [Google Scholar]
  21. Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0057532 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research & practice. New York, NY: Teachers College. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research & practice. (2nd. Edition).  New York, NY: Teachers College. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity.  Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 48-70. http://dx.doi.org/10:1111/curi.12002 [Google Scholar]
  25. Glinton-Meicholas, P. (1995). More talkin’ Bahamian. Nassau, Bahamas: Guanima Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Glinton-Meicholas, P. (2014). An evening in Guanima: A treasury of folktales from the Bahamas. Nassau, Bahamas: Guanima Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. González, N., Moll, L. C., Amanti, G. (Eds.). (2005).  Funds of knowledge.  Theorizing practices in households, classrooms, and communities.  Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hall-Campbell, N. (2011). Culture in context: A mixed methods exploration of school climate and culturally relevant pedagogy beliefs in Bahamian secondary education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). North Carolina State University. Retrieved from http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/6907/1/etd.pdf [Google Scholar]
  29. Jack, V. L. (Ed.). (2004). Preserving our heritage: Language arts, An integrated approach. Oxford, England: Heinemann. (A series of six textbooks: Level 1, pt. 1 and 2, level 2, pt. 1 and 2, and level 3, pt. 1 and 2). [Google Scholar]
  30. Kazemek, F. E. (1984). A brief discussion of readability formulas. The High School Journal, 67(4), 248-251. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/40365220 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, R. E, (2009/1974). Blackbeard the pirate. A reappraisal of his life and times. Winston-Salem, NC: John F. Blair. [Google Scholar]
  33. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nesbitt, N. (Ed.). (2008). Toussaint L’Ouverture: The Haitian revolution. New York: Verso. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nero, S. J. (Ed.). (2006). Dialects, Englishes, creoles and education. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  36. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  37. Porterfield, A. L. (1967). Mirror for adjustment: Therapy in home, school, and society through seeing yourself and others in books. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rush, R. T. (1985). Assessing readability: Formulas and alternatives.  The Reading Teacher, 39 (3), 274-283. [Google Scholar]
  39. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York, NY: Random House. [Google Scholar]
  40. Saunders, T. A. (2004). Colonial seduction/postcolonial lament: a perspective on the role of literature in the life of the author as student and as teacher in the Bahamas. Changing English, 11(1), 125-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1358684042000179499 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schneider, E. W. (Ed.). (2008). Varieties of English: The Americas and the Caribbean. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sleeter, C. E. (Ed.). (2011). Professional development for culturally responsive and relationship-based pedagogy. New York, NY: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  43. Souto-Manning, M. (2010). Freire, teaching and learning: Culture circles across contexts. New York, NY: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  44. Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary grade material. Elementary English, 53, 410–413. [Google Scholar]
  45. Swarts-Gray, E. (2009). The importance of visibility: Students’ and teachers’ criteria for selecting African American literature. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 472-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.6.2 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tate, W. F. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. Review of Research in Education, 22, 195-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732X022001195 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tinker, G. (1984). Dialect and reading: The question of interference. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tinker, G. (1989). Levels of cultural familiarity and strategy use in reading comprehension. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada). Retrieved from http://go.utlib.ca/cat/2258447 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tinker, G. (2014a). Essentialism and respecting the other. In G. Tinker Sachs & G. Verma (Eds.), Critical mass in the teacher education academy: Symbiosis and diversity (pp. 111-129). Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tinker, G. (2014b). You are one of us: Forging the development of dialogic communities of practice in the Bahamas. In C. Leung, J. C. Richards & C. A. Lassonde (Eds.), International collaboration in literacy research and practice (221 - 248). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tinker, G. & Mahon, J. A. (2006). Enabling effective practices in the teaching and learning of English. In M. L. McCloskey, J. Orr & M. Dolitsky (Eds.), Teaching English as foreign language in primary school (pp. 201-222). Alexandria, VA: TESOL. [Google Scholar]
  52. Trounstine, J., & Waxler, R. P. (2005). Finding a voice: The practice of changing lives through literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [Google Scholar]
  53. Woodson, C. G. (1933). The mis-education of the Negro. Chicago, IL: Associated Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.   [Google Scholar]