Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Progressive Education 2024, Vol. 20(6) 16-32

Emerging Research Themes in Mathematics Education: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Most Influential Journals (2019-2023)

Kenan Gökdağ & Mehmet Fatih Özmantar

pp. 16 - 32   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2024.1078.2

Publish Date: December 01, 2024  |   Number of Views: 44  |  Number of Download: 49


Abstract

As in various scientific fields, the volume of publications in mathematics education is rapidly increasing, complicating the detailed examination of academic outputs. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)-based topic modeling algorithms have gained popularity for their ability to synthesize vast amounts of data and provide an overview of emerging research themes within specific fields. This article conducts a topic modeling analysis on 1,000 scholarly articles published between 2019 and 2023 in the five most influential journals in mathematics education. The study identifies 18 research themes, comparing these with a comprehensive topic modeling study conducted in 2018 (Inglis & Foster, 2018). Newly emerging themes include Mathematical Performance and Assessment, Lesson Study, Mathematical Modeling, Social Justice, Teacher Practice, Statistical Literacy, Prospective Teachers' Noticing of Student Thinking, and Framework Design and Development. The findings indicated teacher professional development and education-related studies have been the most prolific research areas over the past five years. Additionally, the research themes and keywords highlighted the ongoing social transformation and shifts in research focuses within mathematics education. This study is expected to be a resource for researchers who conduct research and determine the research theme.

Keywords: Topic Modeling, Mathematics Education, Research themes, Scientific Publications


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Gokdag, K., & Ozmantar, M.F. (2024). Emerging Research Themes in Mathematics Education: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Most Influential Journals (2019-2023). International Journal of Progressive Education, 20(6), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2024.1078.2

Harvard
Gokdag, K. and Ozmantar, M. (2024). Emerging Research Themes in Mathematics Education: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Most Influential Journals (2019-2023). International Journal of Progressive Education, 20(6), pp. 16-32.

Chicago 16th edition
Gokdag, Kenan and Mehmet Fatih Ozmantar (2024). "Emerging Research Themes in Mathematics Education: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Most Influential Journals (2019-2023)". International Journal of Progressive Education 20 (6):16-32. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2024.1078.2

References

    Asmussen, C. B., & Møller, C. (2019). Smart literature review: a practical topic modelling approach to exploratory literature review. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 1-18.
    Barwell, R. (2020). Learning mathematics in a second language: Language positive and language neutral classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(2), 150-178.
    Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research, 3(Jan), 993-1022.
    Blei ve Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2009). Topic models. In Text mining (pp. 101-124). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
    Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84.
    Bittermann, A., & Fischer, A. (2018). How to identify hot topics in psychology using topic modeling. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
    Borba, M. C. (2021). The future of mathematics education since COVID-19: Humans-with-media or humans-with-non-living-things. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1), 385-400. 
    Chen, C., Chen, Y., Horowitz, M., Hou, H., Liu, Z., & Pellegrino, D. (2009). Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 191-209.
    Chen, C. (2016), CiteSpace: A Practical Guide for Mapping Scientific Literature, Novinka, available at: http://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/∼cchen/citespace/books/.
    Chen, H., & Luo, X. (2019). An automatic literature knowledge graph and reasoning network modeling framework based on ontology and natural language processing. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 42, 100959.
    Chen, G. A. (2023). Teacherly response-ability: Ethical relationality as protest against mathematical violence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 114(2), 277-296.
    Choi, J. A., & Kwak, M. H. (2019). Topic changes in mathematics educational research based on LDA. Journal of Education & Culture, 25(5), 1149-1176.
    Da Silva, A. S., Barbosa, M. T. S., de Souza Velasque, L., & et al. (2021). The COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil: How statistics education may contribute to unravel the reality behind the charts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108, 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10112-6
    Drijvers, P., Kodde-Buitenhuis, H., & Doorman, M. (2019). Assessing mathematical thinking as part of curriculum reform in the Netherlands. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(3), 435-456.
    Dowker, A., Cheriton, O., Horton, R., & Mark, W. (2019). Relationships between attitudes and performance in young children’s mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100, 211-230.
    Evans, T., & Jeong, I. (2023). Concept maps as assessment for learning in university mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(3), 475-498.
    Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37-68. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037
    Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 101(suppl_1), 5228-5235.
    González-Forte, J. M., Fernández, C., Van Hoof, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2022). Profiles in understanding operations with rational numbers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 24(3), 230-247.
    Gurcan, F., Dalveren, G. G. M., Cagiltay, N. E., Roman, D., & Soylu, A. (2022). Evolution of software testing strategies and trends: Semantic content analysis of software research corpus of the last 40 years. IEEE Access, 10, 106093-106109.
    Herfort, J. D., Tamborg, A. L., Meier, F., Allsopp, B. B., & Misfeldt, M. (2023). Twenty years of research on technology in mathematics education at CERME: A literature review based on a data science approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(2), 309-336.
    Inglis, M., & Foster, C. (2018). Five decades of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 462-500.
    KNIME (2020), “KNIME j open for innovation”, available at: https://www.knime.com/ (accessed 4September 2020).
    Krawitz, J., Chang, Y. P., Yang, K. L., & Schukajlow, S. (2022). The role of reading comprehension in mathematical modelling: Improving the construction of a real-world model and interest in Germany and Taiwan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 337-359.
    Ko, Y. Y., & Rose, M. K. (2021). Are self-constructed and student-generated arguments acceptable proofs? Pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ evaluations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 64, 100912.
    Kullberg, A., Björklund, C., Brkovic, I., & Runesson Kempe, U. (2020). Effects of learning addition and subtraction in preschool by making the first ten numbers and their relations visible with finger patterns. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(2), 157-172.
    Kwon, O. N., Han, C., Lee, C., & et al. (2021). Graphs in the COVID-19 news: A mathematics audit of newspapers in Korea. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108, 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10029-0
    Lee, M. Y., & Lee, J. E. (2023). An analysis of elementary prospective teachers’ noticing of student pattern generalization strategies in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26, 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09520-5
    Lendínez Muñoz, E. M., García García, F. J., Lerma Fernández, A. M., & Abril Gallego, A. M. (2023). Increase in self-efficacy in prospective teachers through theory-based lesson study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-26.
    Leyva, L. A. (2021). Black women’s counter-stories of resilience and within-group tensions in the white, patriarchal space of mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 52(2), 117-151.
    Martínez-Planell, R., & Trigueros, M. (2019). Using cycles of research in APOS: The case of functions of two variables. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100687.
    Matranga, A., & Silverman, J. (2022). An emerging community in online mathematics teacher professional development: An interactional perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(1), 63-89.
    Miyakawa, T., & Winsløw, C. (2019). Paradidactic infrastructure for sharing and documenting mathematics teacher knowledge: A case study of “practice research” in Japan. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(3), 281-303.
    Morris, N. (2021). Learning probability in the Kingdom of Tonga: The influence of language and culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107, 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10022-z
    Nie, B., & Sun, S. (2017). Using text mining techniques to identify research trends: A case study of design research. Applied Sciences, 7(4), 401.
    Olson, D. L., & Delen, D. (2008). Advanced data mining techniques. Springer Science & Business Media.
    Paul, M., & Girju, R. (2009, September). Topic modeling of research fields: An interdisciplinary perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference RANLP-2009 (pp. 337-342).
    Rodríguez, M. L., & Pulido-Montes, C. (2022). Use of digital resources in higher education during COVID-19: A literature review. Education Sciences, 12(9), 612.
    Ryan, U. (2022). Solidarity acts in the context of language diversity: Students’ encounters with epistemological difference. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100946
    Shahbari, J. A., & Tabach, M. (2020). Features of modeling processes that elicit mathematical models represented at different semiotic registers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09971-2
    Simon, M. A. (2022). Contributions of the learning through activity theoretical framework to understanding and using manipulatives in the learning and teaching of mathematical concepts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100945.
    Tyminski, A. M., Simpson, A. J., Land, T. J., & et al. (2021). Prospective elementary mathematics teachers’ noticing of children’s mathematics: A focus on extending moves. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 533-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09472-2
    Warshauer, H. K., Herrera, C., Smith, S., & Starkey, C. (2023). Examining preservice teachers’ noticing of equity-based teaching practices to empower students engaging in productive struggle. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70, 101045.
    Weingarden, M., Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Nachlieli, T. (2019). The realization tree assessment tool–examining explorative participation in mathematics lessons. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 100717.
    Williams, S. R., & Leatham, K. R. (2017). Journal quality in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 369-396.
    Woods, C., & Weber, K. (2020). The relationship between mathematicians’ pedagogical goals, orientations, and common teaching practices in advanced mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59, 100792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100792
    Vijayan, R. (2021). Teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A topic modeling study. Education Sciences, 11(7), 347.
    Zengul, F. D., Zengul, A. G., Mugavero, M. J., Oner, N., Ozaydin, B., Delen, D., ... & Cimino, J. (2021). A critical analysis of COVID-19 research literature: Text mining approach. Intelligence-based medicine, 5, 100036.