International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2018, Vol. 14(6) 168-176

Learning Implementations about Cooperative Learning Method: A Case Study in Turkey

Perihan Dinç Artut & Ayten Pinar Bal

pp. 168 - 176   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1807-15-0001

Published online: December 31, 2018  |   Number of Views: 246  |  Number of Download: 663


This study aims to evaluate the implementations of cooperative learning method in teaching limit and derivatives and the opinions of prospective teachers and instructors about these implementations. The research is designed as a case study and conducted with 28 prospective teachers (20 female, 8 male) who were attending the course of calculus in the department of science and technology teaching. The data obtained by interviews and observations were analyzed via content analysis. According to results, it was found out that the implementations of cooperative learning method created a positive effect on prospective teachers and made them learn the subjects more easily. On the basis of the results mentioned above, it can be recommended to use the cooperative learning method in teaching the subjects of limit and derivatives in teacher education. This study focused on teaching the subjects of limit and derivative; however ssimilar studies can be carried out with different mathematics topics.

Keywords: Calculus, case study, cooperative learning, student teams-achievement divisions.

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Artut, P.D. & Bal, A.P. (2018). Learning Implementations about Cooperative Learning Method: A Case Study in Turkey . International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(6), 168-176. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.179.13

Artut, P. and Bal, A. (2018). Learning Implementations about Cooperative Learning Method: A Case Study in Turkey . International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(6), pp. 168-176.

Chicago 16th edition
Artut, Perihan Dinc and Ayten Pinar Bal (2018). "Learning Implementations about Cooperative Learning Method: A Case Study in Turkey ". International Journal of Progressive Education 14 (6):168-176. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2018.179.13.

  1. Artut, P. D. (2009). Experimental evaluation of the effects of cooperative learning on kindergarten children's mathematics ability. International journal of educational research, 48(6), 370-380. [Google Scholar]
  2. Artut, P. D. (2016). Effect of Cooperative Learning Method on Prospective Teachers’ Non-routine Problem-Solving Skills and Their Views About the Method. US-China Education Review, 6(4), 244-254.  [Google Scholar]
  3. Artut, P. D. & Tarim, K. (2007). The effectiveness of jigsaw II on prospective elementary school teachers. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 129-141.  [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education,12(1) 23–33. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dimabuyo, M., & Portia, Y. (2011). Effects of cooperative learning on mathematics problem solving ability and attitudes of high school freshmen. Alipato: A Journal of Basic Education, 3(1). [Google Scholar]
  6. Emley, W. P. (1986). The effects of cooperative learning versus individualized instruction in a college level remedial mathematics course, with relation to attitudes toward mathematics and myers-briggs personality type. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(1), 70. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  8. Garfield, J. (1993). Teaching statistics using small –group cooperative learning. Journal of Statistics Education, 1(1).   [Google Scholar]
  9. Gelici, Ö. ve Bilgin, İ. (2012). İşbirlikli Öğrenme Tekniklerinin Öğrencilerin Cebir Öğrenme Alanındaki Başarı, Tutum ve Eleştirel Düşünme Becerilerine Etkileri. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 11(2), 9-32. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilbert-Macmillan, K. M. (1983). Mathematical problem solving in cooperative small groups and whole class instruction. Dissertation Abstracts International, 2700, 4409A. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gök, Ö., Doğan, A., Doymuş, K. Ve Karaçöp, A. (2009). İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yönteminin İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarılarına Ve Fene Olan Tutumlarına Etkileri. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 193-209. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gomleksiz, M. (1997). Cooperative learning: An experiment on fourth year students’ mathematics achievement and their friendship relationships. Adana: Baki Yayınevi. [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson D.W.& Johnson, R.T. (1981). Effects of cooperative and individualistic learning experiences on inter ethnic interaction. Journal of Educatioanl Psychology. 73(3). 454-459. [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning mathematics and cooperative learning lesson plans for teachers. Edina, Minnesota: Interaction Book Company. [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2013). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching. [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson, D. W, & Johnson, R.T (1989). Cooperation and competition. Second edition. Edina, Minnesota:Interaction Book Company. [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.(1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: what evidence is there that it works. Change, 30(4), 26-35. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaptan, F., & Korkmaz, H. (1995). The effects of cooperative problem solving approach on creativity in science course. Education. Science, 79, 555-581. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lazarowitz, R., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. & Baird, H. J. (1994). Learning Science in a Cooperative Setting: Academic Achievement and Affective Outcomes. Journal of Educational Research in Science Teaching. (31) 1121- 1131. [Google Scholar]
  21. Leikin, R. & Zaslavsky, O. (1997). Facilitating student interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning setting, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,  28(3), 331-354. [Google Scholar]
  22. MoNE (2018a). Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programı. Ankara.  [Google Scholar]
  23. MoNE, (2018b). [Online]: Retrieved on 8 October-2018, at URL:, [Google Scholar]
  24. Nichols, J., D.& Hall D., N. (1995). The Effects Of Cooperative Learning On Student Achievement And Motivation In A High School Geometry Class. Norman, Oklahoma: The University of Oklahoma, Graduate College. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement attitudes and ethnic relations, Review of Educational Research, 50(2). 241-271. [Google Scholar]
  26. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  27. Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A. & Leavey, M. (1984). Effects of team-assisted individualisation on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 813-819. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G., (2013). Örneklendirilmiş Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (2. Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tarım, K. (2003). Effectiveness of cooperative learning method on teaching mathematics and a meta analytic study for cooperative learning method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Çukurova University. Adana, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tarım, K., Artut, P.D. (2004). Teaching addition and subtraction skills to preschool children with cooperative learning method. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 5(17), 221-236. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tlusty, R. (1993). Cooperative Learning in a College Chemisry Course. American Educational Research Association, Atlanta: Georgia. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ünver, G. (2013). The Effects of the Educational Training Courses on the Doctoral Students’ Conceptions of Effective. Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 82-89. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ural, A. (2007).  İşbirlikli Öğrenmenin Matematikteki Akademik Başarıya, Kalıcılığa, Matematik Özyeterlilik Algısına Ve Matematiğe Karşı Tutuma Etkisi, Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Voorhis, J. L. (1995, June). Implementing cooperative structure to increase motivation and learning in the college classroom.  Paper presented at The Lilly Conference on College Teaching, Columbia, SC.  [Google Scholar]