International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210
International Journal of Progressive Education
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2020, Vol. 16(5) 106-120

Global Citizenship: From the Lens of the Education Faculty Instructors

Seda Baysal & Işıl Tanrıseven

pp. 106 - 120   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.7   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2003-30-0004.R1

Published online: October 09, 2020  |   Number of Views: 227  |  Number of Download: 710

Save PDF

Abstract

Study objective: This research attempts to reveal the education faculty instructors’ views on the concept of global citizenship. Method: The research utilized a phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research designs. The participants of the research consisted of seven education faculty instructors who work at a higher institution in Turkey during the 2019-2020 academic year and who were selected by the convenience sampling method. This research employed a semi-structured interview method. Thus, a semi-structured individual interview form was prepared by the researchers as a data collection tool. The first part of the form includes questions related to the participants’ demographic information and the second part holds five questions regarding their views on global citizenship. The open-ended questions were prepared in line with the research questions by taking into consideration the relevant literature and two experts’ opinions to ensure scope validity. Content analysis was used during data analysis. Result: Research findings revealed that the instructors mostly focus on “values and attitudes” dimension of the global citizenship including respect for differences and values, sense of belonging, tolerance, concern for global issues, dedication to equal rights and sensitivity to global issues. Besides, all instructors were found to express that global citizenship is a must for pre-service teachers for both themselves and their professional life. All participants were identified to do practices in different ways by intermingling the issue of global citizenship with their course during the educational process to raise their students’ awareness towards global citizenship, and they mostly faced student-based challenges during the practices. The instructors mostly recommended that seminars should be organized in advance to raise both students’ and instructors’ awareness.

Keywords: Education Faculty, Instructor, Global Citizenship, Pre-Service Teacher

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Baysal, S. & Tanriseven, I. (2020). Global Citizenship: From the Lens of the Education Faculty Instructors . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), 106-120. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.7

Harvard
Baysal, S. and Tanriseven, I. (2020). Global Citizenship: From the Lens of the Education Faculty Instructors . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), pp. 106-120.

Chicago 16th edition
Baysal, Seda and Isil Tanriseven (2020). "Global Citizenship: From the Lens of the Education Faculty Instructors ". International Journal of Progressive Education 16 (5):106-120. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.7.
References
  1. Adams, J. M., & Carfagna, A. (2006). Coming of age in a globalized world: The next generation. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Balbağ, N. L. (2016). İlkokul sosyal bilgiler dersi bağlamında öğrenci ve öğretmenlerin küresel vatandaşlık algıları. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniverstesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir. [Google Scholar]
  3. Balbağ, N. L., & Türkcan, B. (2017). Elementary school 4th grade students and teachers’ perception of global citizenship. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 8(2), 216-249. [Google Scholar]
  4. Başarır, F. (2017). Examining the perceptions of English instructors regarding the incorporation of global citizenship education into ELT. Online Submission, 5(4), 409-425. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, E. J. (2009). The role of questioning and dialogue in teaching complex global issues: perceptions of student-teachers in England. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 3(2), 21-37. [Google Scholar]
  6. Burrows, D. (2004). World citizenship. Paper presented at the American Council on Education Regional Conference on New Directions in International Education, Beloit, Wisconsin. Retrieved from https://www.beloit.edu/oie/assets/Burrows.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.   [Google Scholar]
  8. Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, Inc. California. [Google Scholar]
  9. Çelikten, L. (2016). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin küresel vatandaşlık düzeyleri ile öğrencilere aktarmak istedikleri değerlere ilişkin görüşleri arasındaki ilişki. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Niğde Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Niğde. [Google Scholar]
  10. Çermik, F., Çalışoğlu, M., & Tahiroğlu, M. (2016). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin küresel vatandaşlık eğitimi ile ilgili görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(3), 775-790. [Google Scholar]
  11. Çolak, K., Kabapınar, Y., & Öztürk, C. (2019). Sosyal bilgiler derslerini veren öğretmenlerin küresel vatandaşlığa ve küresel vatandaşlık eğitimine bakışları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 44(197), 335-352. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ersoy, A. F. (2013). Global citizenship education in social studies: experiences of Turkish teachers and students in international conflict and war. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 1(1), 7-30.    [Google Scholar]
  14. Garii, B. (2000). US Social studies in the 21st century: Internationalizing the curriculum for global citizens. The Social Studies, 91(6), 257-264. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gibson, K., L., Rimmington, G. M, & Landwehr-Brown, M. (2008). Developing global awareness and responsible world citizenship with global learning. Roeper Review, 30(1), 11-23. [Google Scholar]
  16. Given, L.M. (2008). The sage of encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gürdoğan Bayır, Ö., Göz, N. L. & Bozkurt, M. (2014). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarına göre sosyal bilgiler dersinde küresel vatandaşlık. Journal of Education Sciences Research, 4(2), 145-162. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hillyard, A. K. (2011). Constructions of global citizenship: An Albertan case study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Alberta, Alberta. [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. London: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kan, Ç. (2009a). Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde küresel vatandaşlık. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, 25-30. [Google Scholar]
  21. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel. [Google Scholar]
  22. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. California: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  23. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design. Upper Sadle River, New Jersey: Merrill. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lim, C. P. (2008). Global citizenship education, school curriculum and games: Learning Mathematics, English and Science as a global citizen. Computers & Education, 51(1), 1073-1093.  [Google Scholar]
  25. Lima, C.O. & Brown, S.W. (2007). ICT for development: Are Brazilian students well prepared to become global citizens? Educational Media International, 44(2), 141-153. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  27. Mutluer, C. (2013). The place of history lessons in global citizenship education: The views of the teacher. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(2), 189-200. [Google Scholar]
  28. Myers, J., & Zaman, H. (2009). Negotiating the global and national: immigrant and dominant culture adolescents' vocabularies of citizenship in a transnational world. Teachers College Record, 111(11), 2589-2625. [Google Scholar]
  29. Oxfam (2006). Education for global citizenship: A guide for schools. Retrieved from http://www.oxfam.org.uk/coolplanet/teachers/globciti/downloads/gcguide06.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  30. Oxfam (2006a). Global citizenship guides: Teaching controversial issues. Oxfam Development Education, UK (Oxford, Oxfam GB). [Google Scholar]
  31. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Designing Qualitative Studies. Retrieved from http://legacy.oise.utoronto.ca/research/field- centres/ross/ctl1014/Patton1990.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  32. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research evulation methods. California: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  33. Patton, Q. M. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. London: Sage Pub. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pike, G. (2008). Citizenship education in global context. Brock Education Journal, 17(1), 38–49. [Google Scholar]
  35. Provo, J. (1993). Teaching World Issues. Daily Yomiuri Newspaper, 18. [Google Scholar]
  36. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (1999). Citizenship: the National Curriculum for England, London: Department for Education and Employment and Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.  [Google Scholar]
  37. Rapoport, A. (2013). We cannot teach what we don’t know: Indiana teachers talk about global citizenship education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 5(3), 179-190. [Google Scholar]
  38. Reysen, S., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2013). A model of global citizenship: Antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 858-870. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sart, G. (2015). Fenomenoloji ve yorumlayıcı fenomenolojik analiz. F.N. Seggie & F. Bayyurt (Edt.) Nitel araştırma: Yöntem, teknik, analiz ve yaklaşımlar. Ankara: Anı. [Google Scholar]
  40. Schattle, H. (2005). Communicating global citizenship: Multiple discourses beyond the Academy. Citizenship Studies, 9(2), 119-133. [Google Scholar]
  41. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
  42. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications Ltd.   [Google Scholar]
  43. Strickland, K., Adamson, E., McInally, W., Tiittanen, H., & Metcalfe, S. (2013). Developing global citizenship online: An authentic alternative to overseas clinical placement. Nurse Education Today, 33(10), 1160-1165. [Google Scholar]
  44. Şahin, M., Şahin, S. & Göğebakan-Yıldız, D. (2016). Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi programı ve dünya vatandaşlığı: Öğretmen adaylarının perspektifinden. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2), 369-390.  [Google Scholar]
  45. Tormey, R., & Gleeson, J. (2012). Irish post-primary students' attitudes towards ethnic minorities. Irish Educational Studies, 31(2), 157-173. [Google Scholar]
  46. UNESCO (2014). Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, A. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (5. Ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.   [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 16 Issue 5

October 2020

All Articles

International Journal of Progressive Education

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.