International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2020, Vol. 16(6) 1-14

Visually Impaired Mentally Sighted: An Inclusive Education Case

Bünyamin Bavlı, Mithat Korumaz & Erdoğan Akar

pp. 1 - 14   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2006-04-0007.R1

Published online: December 07, 2020  |   Number of Views: 290  |  Number of Download: 702


This research was carried out as part of an Erasmus + project called “Visually Impaired Mentally Sighted” targeting to improve the conditions and materials used in the educational environment and to develop personal and professional skills of the school staff. This qualitative study employed descriptive case study design. The study involved 16 participants in total including visually impaired students, teachers and the principal from the high school which is the coordinator institution of the project. The researchers conducted two semi-structured focus group interviews with the participant teachers, one focus group interview with participant students and a face-to-face interview with the school principal. The data were analysed according to content analysis. The researchers created four themes as follows; ‘consciousness’, ‘professional development’, ‘teaching materials’ and ‘motivation’. That means students in this case study increased their motivation at school. Also, teachers realized that there is a key area for their professional development. At the same time, the importance of using inclusive educational materials that enable disabled students to access education became apparent.

Keywords: Visually Impaired Students, Inclusive Education, Teachers’ Professional Development, Consciousness

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Bavli, B., Korumaz, M. & Akar, E. (2020). Visually Impaired Mentally Sighted: An Inclusive Education Case . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(6), 1-14. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.1

Bavli, B., Korumaz, M. and Akar, E. (2020). Visually Impaired Mentally Sighted: An Inclusive Education Case . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(6), pp. 1-14.

Chicago 16th edition
Bavli, Bunyamin, Mithat Korumaz and Erdogan Akar (2020). "Visually Impaired Mentally Sighted: An Inclusive Education Case ". International Journal of Progressive Education 16 (6):1-14. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.1.

  1. Ataman, A. (2005). Children with Special Needs and Special Education. Ankara: Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aydemir, D. (2009). The Predictors of Life Satisfaction of Visually Impaired Turkish Adolescents. (Master’s Thesis). 250730. [Google Scholar]
  3. Batu, E. (2010). Factors for the Success of Early Childhood Inclusion & Related Studies in Turkey. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 2(1), 57-71. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baykaldı, G. (2017). Exploring Challenges of Mathematics Teachers Who Teach High School Mathematics For Visually Impaired Students in Turkey. (Master’s Thesis). 581215. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayram, G. (2014). Exploring the Academic and Social Challenges of Visually Impaired Students in Learning High School Mathematics. (Master’s Thesis). 363124. [Google Scholar]
  6. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers .The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  7. Born, S. L., and J. J. Preston. 2016. “The Fertility Problem Inventory and Infertility-Related Stress: A Case Study.” The Qualitative Report 21 (3): 497–520. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carlson, E., Lee, H., & Schroll, K. (2004). Identifying Attributes of High Quality Special Education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 350-259. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cavkaytar, A. (2006, July). Teacher Training on Special Education in Turkey. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(3), 41-45. [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, C., Dyson, A., Milward, A., & Robson, S. (1999, April). Theories of Inclusion, Theories of Schools: Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Inclusive School. British Educational Research Journal, 25(2), 157-177. [Google Scholar]
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Denzin, N., and Y. Lincoln. 2005. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  12. Çakıroğlu, E., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2003). Reflections on teacher education in Turkey. Eurpean Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 253-264. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dreyer, L. (2017, February). Inclusive Education. Retrieved February 03, 2020 from [Google Scholar]
  14. Durna, G. (2012). The Impact of an Integrated Education Upon Visually Disabled Students. (Master’s Thesis). (323587) [Google Scholar]
  15. Gürkan, M., & Özbuga, M. (2011, April). A Guide Book for School Principals - Teachers - Parents . Why-How-What for mainstream Education at Our Schools. Ankara: MEB (Ministry of National Education). [Google Scholar]
  16. Hegazy, S. (2013). Remodeling A School For The Blind And Visually Impaired In Oman. Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(4), 143-158. [Google Scholar]
  17. Horton, K. J. (1998). Education of Visually Impaired Pupils in Ordinary Schools. Guides for Special Education, 129-. UNESCO. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kargın, T., Acarlar, F., & Sucuoğlu, B. (2005). Öğretmen, yönetici ve anne babaların kaynaştırma    uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Teacher, administer, and parent perspectives according to the implications of inclusive education]. Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 4(2), 55-76. [Google Scholar]
  19. McMillan, J. H., and S. Schumacher. 1993. Research in Education: A Conceptual Understanding. New York, NY: Harper Collins. [Google Scholar]
  20. MEB. (2011). A Guide Book for School Principals - Teachers - Parents: Why How What for Mainstreaming Education at Our Schools. Ankara: Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Special Education Guidance and Counseling Services. [Google Scholar]
  21. Melekoglu, M., Çakıroğlu, O., & Malmgren, K. (2009). Special Education in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(3), 287-298. [Google Scholar]
  22. Neuman, W.L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantiative Approaches. Toronto: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  23. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods . Thousand Oakes. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Roberts, P., Rizzo, J.-R., Hreha, K., Wertheimer, J., Kaldenberg, J., Hironaka, D., . . . Colenbrander, A. (2016, January). A Conceptual Model for Vision Rehabilitation. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 53(6), 693-704. [Google Scholar]
  25. Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sart, Z., Barış, S., Sarıışık, Y., & Düşkün, Y. (2016). The Right of Children With Disabilities to Education: Situation Analysis and Recommendations for Turkey. ERG Education Reform Initiative. [Google Scholar]
  27. Stake, R. E. 2000. “Case Studies.” In The Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 435–454. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  28. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA:Sage. [Google Scholar]
  29. Şenel, H. (1998). Special Education in Turkey. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 13(3), 254-261.Retrieved February 03, 2020 from [Google Scholar]
  30. TUIK. (2011). Özürlülerin Sorun ve Beklentileri Araştırması. TUIK Haber Bülteni(71). [Google Scholar]
  31. UNESCO. (2003). Overcoming Exclusion Through Inclusive Approaches in Education: A Challenge & A Vision. Retrieved February 02, 2020 from UNESDOC Digital Library: [Google Scholar]
  32. UNICEF. (2018, December 13). Retrieved February 03, 2020 from Unicef for Every Child: [Google Scholar]
  33. WHO. (2011). World Report on Dİsability. Malta: The World Bank. Retrieved February 03, 2020 from [Google Scholar]
  34. WHO. (2012). Global Data on Visual Impairements 2010. World Health Organization. February 04, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  35. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:Seçkin Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yin, R. K. 2011. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York, NY: Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]