International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210
International Journal of Progressive Education
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2021, Vol. 17(2) 473-490

Awareness and Views of Teachers Who Received In- Service STEM Training About STEM

Dilber Acar & Yasemin Büyükşahin

pp. 473 - 490   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.332.29   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2004-18-0002

Published online: April 07, 2021  |   Number of Views: 35  |  Number of Download: 115

Save PDF

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the awareness and views of teachers from different disciplines who received in-service STEM training about STEM education. To this end, the study employed a mixed methods research design in which both quantitative and qualitative research approaches are used. For the quantitative phase of the study, the sample was composed of 64 teachers from the different branches. The teachers were sampled using convenience sampling. For the qualitative phase of the study, the teachers were chosen using criterion sampling. The sample was drawn of 16 teachers who had a high, moderate or low level of awareness. The quantitative data were collected using the “STEM Awareness Scale” and the qualitative data were collected using a semi-structured interview form. The analysis results showed that teachers’ awareness of STEM increased after the in-service training. The teachers held the view that using the STEM approach in their classes is beneficial to, themselves, students, and the country and the effective implementation of STEM education depends on the elimination of shortcomings such as the lack of time, materials, and workshops.

Keywords: STEM Education, Teacher Views, Awareness, STEM Training

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Acar, D. & Buyuksahin, Y. (2021). Awareness and Views of Teachers Who Received In- Service STEM Training About STEM . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(2), 473-490. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.332.29

Harvard
Acar, D. and Buyuksahin, Y. (2021). Awareness and Views of Teachers Who Received In- Service STEM Training About STEM . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(2), pp. 473-490.

Chicago 16th edition
Acar, Dilber and Yasemin Buyuksahin (2021). "Awareness and Views of Teachers Who Received In- Service STEM Training About STEM ". International Journal of Progressive Education 17 (2):473-490. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2021.332.29.
References
  1. Acar, D. (2018). FeTeMM eğitiminin ilkokul 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarı, eleştirel düşünme ve problem çözme becerisi üzerine etkisi. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakırcı, H. & Kutlu, E. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin FeTeMM yaklaşımı hakkındaki görüşlerinin belirlenmesi. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(2), 367- 389. DOI: 10.16949/turkbilmat.417939. [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker, K. & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary- meta analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 5(6), 23- 37. [Google Scholar]
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö. & Köklü, N. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik (15th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, R.W. (2010,b). Advencing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35. [Google Scholar]
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  8. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 209, 240. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  9. Çevik, M. (2017). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerine yönelik FeTeMM farkındalık ölçeği (FFÖ) geliştirme çalışması. International Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2436- 2452. doi:10.14687/jhs.v14i3.4673. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  10. Eroğlu, S. & Bektaş, O. (2016). STEM eğitimi almış fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin STEM temelli ders etkinlikleri hakkındaki görüşleri. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi- Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 4(3), 43- 67.  DOI: 10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c3s3m [Google Scholar]
  11. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, E. N., & Hyun, H. H.(2012) How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gonzalez, H.B., & Kuenzi, J.J. (2012). Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer. Retrived from https://www.stem.org/cm/dpl/downloads/content/69/R42642.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  13. Hernandez,  J. F. (2014). The implement of an elementary STEM learning team and the effect on teacher self- efifficacy: An action research study.  Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Capella University, Minnesota. Retrieved from: https://www.certifystem.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Hernandez-2-Dissertation-Format-and-Editing-Approval-6-12-14.pdf [Google Scholar]
  14. Kalaycı, Ş. (2016). SPSS Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (7th ed.). Ankara: Asil. [Google Scholar]
  15. Karakaya, F., Ünal, A., Çimen, O. & Yılmaz, M. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin STEM yaklaşımına yönelik farkındalıkları. Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 124- 138.  Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/496663. [Google Scholar]
  16. Koyunlu Ünlü, Z. & Dere, Z. (2019). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının FeTeMM farkındalıklarının değerlendirilmesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 44- 55. DOI: 10.17556/erziefd.481586 . [Google Scholar]
  17. Koehler, C., Binns, I. C., & Bloom, M.A. (2016). The emergence of STEM. In C.c., Johnson, E.e., Peters- Burton & T.J., Moore  (Eds.), STEM road map a framework for ıntegrated STEM education (pp. 13- 22). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kwon, S-B., Nam, D- S., & Lee, T- W. (2012). The effects of STEAM- based integrated subject study on elementary school students’ creative personality. The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 17(2), 79- 86.  http://data.doi.or.kr/qr/10.9708/jksci.2012.17.2.079.  [Google Scholar]
  19. Lamb, R., Akmal, T., & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of a cognition- priming model describing learning in a STEM classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 410- 437. DOI 10.1002/tea.21200. [Google Scholar]
  20. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  21. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937-FEN%20B%C4%B0L%C4%B0MLER%C4%B0%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI2018.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı. Retrieved from: http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201813017165445-MATEMAT%C4%B0K%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%202018v.pdf [Google Scholar]
  23. Murphy, T. P., & Mancini- Samuelson, G. J. (2012). Graduating STEM component and confident teachers: The creation of a STEM certificate for elementary education majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(2), 18- 23. http://ecstem.org/documents/70-stem-confident-teachers.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nadelson, L.S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M. & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry- based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157- 168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667014  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Özbilen, A. G. (2018). STEM eğitimine yönelik öğretmen görüşleri ve farkındalıkları. Bilimsel Eğitim Araştırmaları, 2(1), 1-21. [Google Scholar]
  26. Özçakır Sümen, Ö. & Çalışıcı, H. (2016). Pre- service teachers’ mind maps and opinions on STEM education implemented in an environmental literacy course. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(2), 459- 476. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2016.2.0166. [Google Scholar]
  27. Park, M., Nam, Y., Moore, T. J., & Roehring, G. (2011). The impact of integrating engineering into science learning on student’s conceptual understandings of the concept of heat transfer. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 4(2), 89-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Patrick, W. P. (2016). Teacher perception of technology as a conduit to acquiring critical thinking skills. Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University, Minneapolis.  [Google Scholar]
  29. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  30. Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J. & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre- College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28-34. DOI: 10.5703/1288284314653. [Google Scholar]
  31. Şahin, A., Ayar, M.C., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik içerikli okul sonrası etkinlikler ve öğrenciler üzerindeki etkileri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(1), 1-26. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.1.1876. [Google Scholar]
  32.  Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidel, LS. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (sixth ed.). Boston: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tarkın Çelikkıran, A. & Aydın Günbatar, S. (2017). Kimya öğretmen adaylarının FeTeMM uygulamaları hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 1624- 1656. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yyuefd/issue/28496/360643. [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas, T. A. (2014). Elementary teachers’ receptivity to integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education in the elementary grades. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno. [Google Scholar]
  35. Uğraş, M. (2017). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin STEM uygulamalarına yönelik görüşleri. Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 1(1), 39- 54. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, H. H. (2012). A new era of science education: Science teachers’ perceptions and classroom practices of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) integration. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H. & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre- College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636.  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  38. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yıldırım, B. & Türk, C. (2018). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının STEM eğitimine yönelik görüşleri: Uygulamalı bir çalışma. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 195- 213. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 17 Issue 2

April 2021

All Articles

International Journal of Progressive Education

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2021 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.