International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2021, Vol. 17(4) 99-121

Using Metaphors to Investigate the Images of Countries

Fitnat Gürgil

pp. 99 - 121   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.7   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2101-16-0001

Published online: August 08, 2021  |   Number of Views: 13  |  Number of Download: 60


Abstract

This study researched the use of metaphor among students and teachers to determine the images they had in their minds regarding a specific set of developed countries, and in doing so, utilized a longitudinal design carried out over four stages between November 2015 and November 2018 within a large metropolitan city in Turkey. The study findings revealed that the mental images of both teachers and students contained various stereotypical views about these developed countries. The participants appeared to have the most negative mental images about France, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US), while having the most positive images about Australia and Japan. It was concluded that there is a strong relationship between metaphor creation and age, and that metaphor production increases rapidly as the students get older and more knowledgeable. It was also determined that metaphor quality and production rate decreases as teachers’ professional seniority increased.

Keywords: Metaphor, Country Image, Stereotypes


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Gurgil, F. (2021). Using Metaphors to Investigate the Images of Countries . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 99-121. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.7

Harvard
Gurgil, F. (2021). Using Metaphors to Investigate the Images of Countries . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), pp. 99-121.

Chicago 16th edition
Gurgil, Fitnat (2021). "Using Metaphors to Investigate the Images of Countries ". International Journal of Progressive Education 17 (4):99-121. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.7.

References
  1. Akpınar, B. (2006). Avrupa Birliğine uyum sürecinde Türk ilköğretim öğrencilerinin Avrupa Birliği imajı [European Union image of Turkish elementary school students in the European Union harmonization process]. Eğitimde Politika Analizleri ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1), 8-26. [Google Scholar]
  2. Allport. G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. NY: Addison-Wesley [Google Scholar]
  3. Augoustinos, M., & Rosewarne, D. L. (2001). Stereotype knowledge and prejudice in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 143-156.  [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker, A. H. (1997). Emergent and common features influence metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(4), 243-259. [Google Scholar]
  5. Białecka-Pikul, M. (2010). Teaching children to understand metaphors as a path leading to theory of mind development. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7(5), 529-544. [Google Scholar]
  6. Burbules, N. C., Schraw, G., & Trathen, W. (1989). Metaphor, idiom, and figuration. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4(2), 93-110. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19, 1-15. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chandra, S. (1967). Stereotypes of university students toward different ethnic groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 71(1), 87-94. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chattalas, M., Kramer, T., & Takada, H. (2008). The impact of national stereotypes on the country of origin effect: A conceptual framework. International Marketing Review, 25(1), 54–74. [Google Scholar]
  10. Child, I. L., & Doob, L. W. (1943). Factors determining national stereotypes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 203-219. [Google Scholar]
  11. Choudhury, S., Blakemore, S. J., & Charman, T. (2006). Social cognitive development during adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 165-174. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cunningham, J. W. (1976). Metaphor and reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 8, 363-368. [Google Scholar]
  13. Deignan, A. (2003) Metaphorical expressions and culture: an indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 255-271. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dent, C. H. (1987). Developmental studies of perception and metaphor: the Twain shall meet. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2(1), 53-71. [Google Scholar]
  15. Diab, L. N. (1962). National stereotypes and the “reference group” concept. The Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 339-351. [Google Scholar]
  16. Diab, L. N. (1963). Factors affecting studies of national stereotypes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 59(1), 29-40. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dudycha, G. J.  (1942). The attitudes of college students toward war and the Germans before and during the second world war. The Journal of Social Psychology, 15(2), 317-324. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87(6), 477-531. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gardner, H., Kircher, M., Winner, E., & Perkins, D. (1975). Children's metaphoric productions and preferences. Journal of Child Language, 2, 125-141.  [Google Scholar]
  20. Gibbs, R. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 145-166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529-562. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gilbert, G. M. (1951). Stereotype persistence and change among college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 245-254. [Google Scholar]
  23. Glicksohn, J., Kraemer, S., & Yisraeli, O. (1993). A note on metaphoric thinking and ideational fluency. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8(1), 67-70. [Google Scholar]
  24. Glicksohn, J., & Yafe, T. (1998). Physiognomic perception and metaphoric thinking in young children. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(3), 179-204. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jablonski, P., van der Lans, J., & Hermans, C. (1998). Metaphor theories and religious language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(4), 287-292.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Haas, M. E., & Clary, E. (1985). The perception of other nations by students in north-western Arkansas. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED257710) [Google Scholar]
  27. Karakuş, U., & Aşçı, F. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin kıta, okyanus ve ülke ile ilgili harita bilgileri ve ülkelere karşı duyuşsal tavırları [The map knowledge of secondary school students related to the concepts of continents, oceans and countries and their cognitive attitudes towards countries]. Turkish Studies, 13(27), 1308-2140. [Google Scholar]
  28. Katz, D., & Braly, K.W. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one-hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280-290. [Google Scholar]
  29. Keil, E. (1986). Conceptual domains and the acquisition of metaphor. Cognitive Development, 1, 73-96. [Google Scholar]
  30. Korner, I. N., & Allison, R. B. (1965) Comparative study of metaphoric thinking. The Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 67-70. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaphors we live by [Metaforlar hayat, anlam ve dil, Çeviren: Gökhan Yavuz Demir]. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.  [Google Scholar]
  32. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace [Google Scholar]
  33. Low, G. (2008). Metaphor and education. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 212-231). NY: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lynch, H. L., & Fisher-Ari, T. R. (2017). Metaphor as pedagogy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66,195-203. [Google Scholar]
  35. Madon, S., Guyll, M., Aboufadel, K., Montiel, E., Smith, A., Palumbo, P., & Jussim, L. (2001). Ethnic and national stereotypes: The Princeton trilogy revisited and revised. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 996-1010.  [Google Scholar]
  36. Mahood, W. (1987). Metaphors in social studies instruction. Theory and Research in Social Education, 15(4), 285-297. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mashal, N., Gavrieli, R., & Kavé, G. (2011). Age-related changes in the appreciation of novel metaphoric semantic relations. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition: A Journal on Normal and Dysfunctional Development, 18(5), 527-543. [Google Scholar]
  38. McCrae R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). 79 Members of the personality profiles of cultures project personality profiles of cultures: aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 407-425. [Google Scholar]
  39. Meenes, M. (1943). A comparison of racial stereotypes of 1935 and 1942. The Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 327-336. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mllckl, P. P., & Ellemers, N. (1996). Being different or being better? National stereotypes and identifications of Polish and Dutch students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 97-114. [Google Scholar]
  41. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  42. Navaneedhan, C. G., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2016). Is metaphorical thinking related to development of cognitive structures among learners? World Scientific News, 52, 1-13.  [Google Scholar]
  43. Nelson, E. M. M. (1993). The effect of metaphor on group reminiscence. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8(4), 297-309. [Google Scholar]
  44. Noveck, I. A., Bianco, M., & Castry, A. (2001). The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(1-2), 109-121. [Google Scholar]
  45. Saban, A. (2004). Prospective classroom teachers’ metaphorical images of selves and comparing them to those they have of their elementary and cooperating teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 617–635. [Google Scholar]
  46. Saban, A. (2010). Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 290-305. [Google Scholar]
  47. Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 123-139. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1956). An outline of social psychology. NY: Harper. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sierp, A., & Karner, C. (2017). National stereotypes in the context of the European crisis. National Identities, 19(1), 1-9. [Google Scholar]
  50. Siltanen, S. A. (1986). Butterflies are rainbows?: A developmental investigation of metaphor comprehension. Communication Education, 35(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  51. Siltanen, S. A. (1990). Effects of explicitness on children's metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 5(1), 1-20. [Google Scholar]
  52. Sinha, A. K. P., & Upadhyaya, O. P. (1960) Change and persistence in the stereotypes of university students toward different ethnic groups during Sino-Indian border dispute. The Journal of Social Psychology, 52(1), 31-39. [Google Scholar]
  53. Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213-241.  [Google Scholar]
  54. Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 69-74. [Google Scholar]
  55. Stites, L. J., & Özçalışkan, Ş. (2013). Teasing apart the role of cognitive and verbal factors in children's early metaphorical abilities. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 116-129. [Google Scholar]
  56. Stofflett, R. (1996). Metaphor development by secondary teachers enrolled in graduate teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 577-589. [Google Scholar]
  57. Stuhlfaut, M. W., & Vanden Bergh, B. G. (2014). Creativity is …: A metaphoric model of the creative thought process. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(6), 383-396. [Google Scholar]
  58. Özçalışkan, Ş. (2007). Metaphors we move by: children's developing understanding of metaphorical motion in typologically distinct languages. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2), 147-168. [Google Scholar]
  59. Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186. [Google Scholar]
  60. Piaget, J., & Weil, A.  (1951). The development in children of the idea of the homeland and of relations with other countries. International Social Science Bulletin, 3, 561-578. [Google Scholar]
  61. Pike, L. W., & Barrows, T. S. (1979). Other nations other peoples: A survey of student interests, knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. [Google Scholar]
  62. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6. [Google Scholar]
  63. Rutter, M. (1985). Family and school influences on cognitive development. Journal Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26(5), 683-704. [Google Scholar]
  64. Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalek, A. M., Adam, N., Adamovova, L., Ahn, C., Ahn, H., … McCrae, R.R. et al. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310, 96-100. [Google Scholar]
  65. Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  66. Vosniadou, S. (1989). Context and the development of metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4(3), 159-171. [Google Scholar]
  67. Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. K., & Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology, 12(4), 289-297. [Google Scholar]
  68. Yılmaz, K., & Yiğit, Ö. (2010). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının Avrupa, Ortadoğu ve Türkiye’ye komşu ülkelere ilişkin algıları [Pre-Service social studies teachers’ perceptions of Europe, the Middle East, and the neighbouring countries of Turkey]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 38, 318-334. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yu, N. (2008). Metaphor from body and culture. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]