Research article | Open Access
International Journal of Progressive Education 2014, Vol. 10(3) 47-59
Scholar-Practitioner Leadership: A Conceptual Foundation
pp. 47 - 59
Publish Date: October 15, 2014 | Single/Total View: 254/673 | Single/Total Download: 388/1.216
Abstract
The scholar-practitioner leader operates reflexively in the boundaries between theory and practice, striving to create exemplars of democracy and social justice within schools while simultaneously meeting modern accountability demands. This article outlines a theoretical underpinning for scholar- practitioner leadership and provides means of operationalizing it in context.
Keywords: Scholar-practitioner leadership, accountability, democracy and social justice
How to Cite this Article?
APA 7th edition
Bailey, S. (2014). Scholar-Practitioner Leadership: A Conceptual Foundation. International Journal of Progressive Education, 10(3), 47-59.
Harvard
Bailey, S. (2014). Scholar-Practitioner Leadership: A Conceptual Foundation. International Journal of Progressive Education, 10(3), pp. 47-59.
Chicago 16th edition
Bailey, Scott (2014). "Scholar-Practitioner Leadership: A Conceptual Foundation". International Journal of Progressive Education 10 (3):47-59.
References
- Anderson, G. L. (1996). The cultural politics of schools: Implications for leadership. In K.Leithwood, [Google Scholar]
- J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 948-966). AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, G. L. (1998). Toward authentic particiapation: deconstructing the discourses of participatory reforms in education. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 571-603. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, G. L., & Saavedra, E. (2002). School-based reform, leadership, and practitioner research: Mapping the Terrain. Scholar practitioner quarterly: A journal for the scholar-practitioner leader, 1(1), 23-38. [Google Scholar]
- Apple, M.W. & Beane, J.A. (1995). The case for democratic schools. In M.W. Apple & J.A. Beane (Eds.) Democratic schools. (pp.1-25). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Google Scholar]
- Bates, R. J. (1984). Toward a critical practice of educational administration. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. [Google Scholar]
- E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice (pp. 260-274). Chicago: University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar]
- Codd, J. (1989). Educational leadership as reflective action. In R. Walker & S. Kemmis (Series Eds.) & J. Smyth ( Vol. Ed.), Deakins studies in education series: No. 3. Critical perspectives of educational leadership (pp. 157-178). NewYork: Falmer Press. [Google Scholar]
- Dewey, J. (1937). Democracy and educational administration. School and Society, 45(1162). 457-462. [Google Scholar]
- Donaldson, G. A. (2001). Cultivating leadership in schools: Connection people, purpose, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
- Duffy, F.M. (2003). Courage, passion, and vision: A guide to leading systemic school improvement. United States of America: Scarecrow Press. [Google Scholar]
- Fazzaro, C. J., Walter, J. E., & McKerrow, K. K. (1994). Education administration in a postmodern society: Implications for moral practice. In S. J. Maxcy (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration (pp. 85-95). Westport, CT: Praeger. [Google Scholar]
- Freire, P. (2004). Pedagogy of the oppressed: 30th anniversary edition. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- Foster, W. P. (1984). Toward a critical theory of educational administration. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. [Google Scholar]
- E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice (pp. 240-259). Chicago: University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar]
- Foster, W. (1994). School leaders as transformative intellectuals: Toward a critical pragmatism. In N. [Google Scholar]
- Prestine & P. W. Thurston (Eds.), Advances in educational administration: Vol. 4. New directions in educational administration: Policy, preparation, and practice (pp. 29-51). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. [Google Scholar]
- Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
- Glasman, N. S., & Glasman, L. D. (1997). Connecting the preparation of school leaders to the practice of school leadership. Peabody journal of education, 72(2), 3-20. [Google Scholar]
- Greenfield, T. B. (1984). Leaders and schools: Willfulness and nonnatural order in organizations. In T. [Google Scholar]
- J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice (pp. 260-274). Chicago: University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar]
- Greenfield, T. B. (1986). The decline and fall of science in educational administration. Interchange, 17(2), 57-80. [Google Scholar]
- Horn, R. A. (2002). Differing perspectives on the magic of dialogue: Implications for a scholar- practitioner leader. Scholar practitioner quarterly: A journal for the scholar-practitioner leader, 1(2), 83-102. [Google Scholar]
- Jenlink, P.M. (2001, April). Scholar-practitioner leadership: A critical analysis of preparation and practice. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Session, 39.55, Seattle, Washington. [Google Scholar]
- Jenlink, P. M. (2002). The scholar-practitioner as bricoleur. Scholar practitioner quarterly: A journal for the scholar-practitioner leader, 1(2), 3-5. [Google Scholar]
- Jenlink, P. M. (2003). Identity and culture work: The scholar-practitioner as public intellectual. Scholar practitioner quarterly: A journal for the scholar-practitioner leader, 1(4), 3-8. [Google Scholar]
- Johnston, B. J., (1994). Educational administration in the postmodern age. . In S. J. Maxcy (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration (pp. 115-131). Westport, CT: Praeger. [Google Scholar]
- Kincheloe, J. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (1999). A tentative description of post-formal thinking: The critical confrontation with cognitive theory. In S. R. Steinberg& J. L. Kincheloe (Series Eds.) & [Google Scholar]
- S. R. Steinberg, J. L. Kincheloe, & P. H. Hinchey (Vol. Eds.), Critical education practice: The post formal reader (pp. 55-90). New York: Falmer Press. [Google Scholar]
- McElroy-Johnston, B. (1993). Teaching and practice: Giving voice to the voiceless. Harvard Educational Review, 63(1), 85-103. [Google Scholar]
- Menand, L. (1997). Pragmatism: A reader. New York: Vintage Books. [Google Scholar]
- Mills, C. W. (1959/1976). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track, part 2: Curriculum inequality and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, (October). 148-162. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, J. (1998). Critical leadership for education in a postmodern world: Emancipation, resistance, and communal action. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(3), 257-278. [Google Scholar]
- Senge, P. M. (1994). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Dell Publishing Group. [Google Scholar]
- Starrat, R. J. (2001). Democratic leadership theory in late modernity: An oxymoron or ironic possibility? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(4), 333-352. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, C. (1998). Living with difference. In A. L. Allen and M. C. Regan, Jr. (eds.), Debating democracy’s discontent: Essay on American politics, law, and public philosophy (pp. 212- 226). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Wheatley, M. J. (1999). Leadership and the new science: discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [Google Scholar]
