Research article | Open Access
International Journal of Progressive Education 2013, Vol. 9(3) 194-217
pp. 194 - 217
Publish Date: October 15, 2013 | Single/Total View: 15/438 | Single/Total Download: 18/753
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the mathematical literacy of the 15-year-old students in terms of PISA mathematical literacy questions. The research model of this study is the survey model in the quantitative models. The sample of this study was composed of 1.227 students who received formal education in five different types of schools (science high schools, Anatolian high schools, private high schools, public high schools and vocational high schools) of various cities, each of which was selected from each of seven geographical regions in Turkey. Nine questions were applied and revealed in the mathematical area in PISA in 2003 as a data collection tool. The results of this study show that, in terms of the proportion of answering the assessment questions, the best performing type of school is science high schools. It was shown that a great number of students still cannot answer the proficiency level questions in the desired way and only half can answer the lower- intermediate and intermediate questions.
Keywords: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), Mathematical literacy, 15-year-old students
APA 7th edition
Ilbagi, E.A., & Akgun, L. (2013). An Investigation of the Mathematical Literacy of Students Aged 15 in terms of Pisa 2003 Mathematical Literacy Questions: Results from Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 9(3), 194-217.
Harvard
Ilbagi, E. and Akgun, L. (2013). An Investigation of the Mathematical Literacy of Students Aged 15 in terms of Pisa 2003 Mathematical Literacy Questions: Results from Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 9(3), pp. 194-217.
Chicago 16th edition
Ilbagi, Esra Azapagasi and Levent Akgun (2013). "An Investigation of the Mathematical Literacy of Students Aged 15 in terms of Pisa 2003 Mathematical Literacy Questions: Results from Turkey". International Journal of Progressive Education 9 (3):194-217.