Pre-service Social Studies Teachers’ Views about the Teaching Knowledge Test

Adem Beldağ

doi:https://doi.org/

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2017, Vol. 13(3) 16-30

Pre-service Social Studies Teachers’ Views about the Teaching Knowledge Test

Adem Beldağ

pp. 16 - 30 | Manu. Number: ijpe.2017.024

Published online: October 08, 2017 | Number of Views: 651 | Number of Download: 994

Save PDF

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine pre-service social studies teachers’ views about the Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT). The study was conducted within the framework of case-study which is one of the qualitative research methods. The study-group consists of 13 pre-service teachers. Two semi-structured interview forms were used to collect data. Descriptive analysis approach was utilized for the analysis of the collected data. Upon reviewing of the results, it was seen that during the interviews both before and after the exam, pre-service teachers were of the opinion that the content knowledge test should be continued to be conducted; that the number of questions in the exam is not sufficient to measure the content knowledge; that giving weight to undergraduate academic lessons will have an affirmative contribution to this exam.

Keywords: Social studies, Teaching Knowledge Test, teacher training

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Beldag, A. (2017). Pre-service Social Studies Teachers’ Views about the Teaching Knowledge Test . International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(3), 16-30.

Harvard
Beldag, A. (2017). Pre-service Social Studies Teachers’ Views about the Teaching Knowledge Test . International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(3), pp. 16-30.

Chicago 16th edition
Beldag, Adem (2017). "Pre-service Social Studies Teachers’ Views about the Teaching Knowledge Test ". International Journal of Progressive Education 13 (3):16-30.

References

Arslan, S. & Özpınar, İ. (2008). Teachers qualifications: comparison between primary school curriculum expectations and teachers acquisitions in education faculties. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 38-63.

Atav, E. & Sönmez, S. (2013). The views of teacher candidates about public personnel selection examination (PPSE). H. U. Journal of Education Özel Sayı, (1), 01-13.

Başkan, Z. & Alev, N. (2009). Kamu Personeli Seçme Sınavı’nda çıkan soruların öğretmenlik meslek derslerine göre kapsam geçerliliği. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,11(1), 29-49.

Berliner, D. C. (2005). The near imposibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205-213.

Beşoluk, Ş. & Horzum, M. B. (2011). Prospective teachers’ views regarding pedagogical courses, field knowledge courses and willingness to serve as a teacher. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 44(1), 17-49.

Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J. & He, M. F. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge lanspace. Teaching and Teacher Education,. 13(7), 665-674

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3th Edition). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Çelikten, M., Şanal M. & Yeni, Ö. Y. (2005). Öğretmenlik mesleği ve özellikleri. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 207-237.

Çimen, O., & Yılmaz, M. (2011). The opinions of the biology teacher candidates about PPSE. Gümüşhane University Electronic Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 4, 159-172.

Demir, S. B. ve Bütüner, K. (2014). Investigation of the opinions of pre-service social studies teachers regarding the field test. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(2), 113- 128

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks:Sage.

Eraslan, L. (2004). Öğretmenlik mesleğine girişte Kamu Personeli Seçme Sınavı (KPSS) yönteminin değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Human Sciences,1(1),1-31.

Ercoşkun, M. H. & Nalçacı A. (2009). Investigation of ÖSS, academic and KPSS achievements of classroom teacher candidates as regards various variations. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(2), 479-486.

Erdem, E. & Soylu, Y. (2013). Prospective teachers’ opinions about CSSE and field examination. Çankırı Karatekin University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 4(1), 223-236.

Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson.

Hancock, B. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research. Leicester on Yell:Trent Focus Group.

Hartley, D. (1998). Repeat Prescription: The national curriculum for initial teacher training, British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(1), 68-83. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00071

Karataş, S., & Güleş, H. (2013). Evaluation of the selection exam for civil cervants (KPSS) from pre-service teachers’. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 6(1), 102-119.

Kilimci, S. (2006). The comparison of initial teacher training programmes of Germany, France, England and Turkey. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Çukurova University, Adana.

Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Kuran, K. (2012). Teacher candidates’ evaluation of public employee selection examination support classes offered at private teaching institutions. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9 (18), 143-157.

MEB, 1739 Sayılı Milli Eğitim Temel Kanunu (1973). http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/temkanun_1, Erişim Tarihi: 19 Aralık 2013.

MEB,. (2010). IVIII. Milli Eğitim Şura. http://www.meb.gov.tr/duyurular/ duyurular2010/ttkb/ 18Sura_kararlari _tamami.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 05 Ocak 2014.

MEB, Komisyon. (2004). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri. Ankara: Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Merkezi Genel Müdürlüğü.

MEB, Komisyon. (2008). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmeni özel alan yeterlikleri. Ankara: Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Merkezi Genel Müdürlüğü.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research (Third Edition). San Francisco: A Wiley Imprint.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.

Özkan, S. & Bağçeci, B. (2015). An examınatıon of KPSS content knowledge test wıthın the scope of Turkısh teachıng program and specıalty competencıes. Turkish Studies, 10(11), 1231-1250. doi:Number:http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8614

Öztürk, C. (2006). Sosyal bilgiler: Toplumsal yaşama disiplinler arası bir bakış. Cemil Öztürk (Ed.). Hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi yapılandırıcı bir yaklaşım (s. 1-30). (3. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Safran, M., Kan, A., Üstündağ, M. T., Birbudak, T. S. & Yıldırım, O. (2014). An investigation of KPSS 2013 results in terms of candidate teachers’ fields. Education and Science, 39(171), 13-25.

Sezgin & Duran, (2011). The reflections of the public personnel selection examination on teacher candidates’ academic and social lives. TSA, 15(3), 9-22.

Stephens, P. & Crawley, T. (2002). Becoming an effective teacher. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.

Şimşek, N. & Akgün, İ. H. (2014). The view of pre-service teachers of social studies about teacher-content knowledge exam in KPSS, International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 5(15), 82-100.

Şişman, M. (2001). Öğretmenliğe giriş. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Yaylacı, F. (2013). Approach problem for teachers to develop themselves. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, Özel sayı (14), 25-40.

Yeşil, R., Korkmaz, Ö. & Kaya, S. (2009). The effect of the academic achievement in educational faculty on achievement in the public personnel selection examination. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2), 149-160.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.

Yiğit, N. & Alev, N. (2015). Analyzing questions for physics teachers in PPSE subject matter test in terms of special subject matter competencies. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 4 (1), 13-18.

Volume 13 Issue 3

October 2017

All Articles