International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(6) 63-75

The Mediating Role of Attachment Styles in the Relationship Between Rejection Sensitivity and Marriage Expectation in University Students

Mesküre Hülya Unal Karaguven & Derya Aslan

pp. 63 - 75   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.477.5   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2111-29-0001.R2

Published online: December 11, 2022  |   Number of Views: 144  |  Number of Download: 419


Abstract

University years are the years of intense anxiety about the future for university students. A young person is worried about what kind of life (s)he will have in the future and who (s)he will marry. Because one of the most important events in human life is marriage and having a happy marriage is an important life goal of individuals. Spouses have many expectations from each other, such as friendship, intimacy, compatibility, and equality. However, failure to meet expectations in marriage has been identified as an important factor in the termination of a marriage. These expectations became clear in the years coinciding with the university period. The present study aims to investigate the mediating role of attachment styles in the relationship between rejection sensitivity and marriage expectation. The sample group for this study included 365 university students, 265 females and 100 males. A questionnaire form, the Marriage Expectancy Scale, the Three-Dimensional Attachment Styles Scale, and the Rejection Sensitivity Scale were used to collect data. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and mediator analysis methods. The analyses revealed that secure attachment has a partial mediating role in the relationship between rejection sensitivity and marriage expectation. However, avoidant attachment and fearful attachment were found to have no mediating role. In line with the findings from this study, it is recommended that seminars be delivered on this issue and that similar studies be conducted with different groups.

Keywords: University Students, Marriage Expectation, Rejection Sensitivity, Attachment Styles


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Karaguven, M.H.U. & Aslan, D. (2022). The Mediating Role of Attachment Styles in the Relationship Between Rejection Sensitivity and Marriage Expectation in University Students . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(6), 63-75. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.477.5

Harvard
Karaguven, M. and Aslan, D. (2022). The Mediating Role of Attachment Styles in the Relationship Between Rejection Sensitivity and Marriage Expectation in University Students . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(6), pp. 63-75.

Chicago 16th edition
Karaguven, Meskure Hulya Unal and Derya Aslan (2022). "The Mediating Role of Attachment Styles in the Relationship Between Rejection Sensitivity and Marriage Expectation in University Students ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (6):63-75. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.477.5.

References
  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behavior: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health,26(9), 1113-1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Akşemsettinoğlu, S. (2020). Romantik İlişki Yaşayan Bireylerin Çocukluk Dönemi Örselenme Yaşantıları, İlişki Doyumu ve Evlilik Beklentisi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi [Unpublished master's thesis]. Gaziantep University. [Google Scholar]
  4. Atik, E.L. (2013). Liseli Ergenlerde Bağlanma Stilleri ve Psikolojik Sağlamlık Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkide Öz-yansıtma ve İç Görünün Rolü [Unpublished master's thesis]. İstanbul Bilim University. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: The role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 435-448. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Baucom, D. H., & Epstein, N. (1990). Cognitive-behavioral marital therapy. Brunner/Mazel. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bener, Ö. & Günay, G. (2013). Gençlerin evlilik ve aile yaşamına ilişkin tutumları. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bintaş, Z. P. (2015). Bağlanma kuramı perspektifinden sosyal kaygı: Erken dönem uyumsuz şemalar ve reddedilme duyarlılığının rolü[Unpublished master's thesis]. Uludağ University. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol. 2. Separation, anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bowlby, J., May, D. S., & Solomon, M. (1989). Attachment theory. Los Angeles, CA: Lifespan Learning Institute. [Google Scholar]
  12. Boyer-Pennington, M. E., Pennington, J., & Spink, C. (2001). Students' expectations and optimism toward marriage as a function of parental divorce. Journal of divorce & remarriage, 34(3-4), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v34n03_05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Örnekleme yöntemleri. [Google Scholar]
  14. Çizmecioğlu, R. (2020). Evlilik olgunluğu ile evlilik beklentisi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi[Unpublished master's thesis]. İstanbul Ticaret University. [Google Scholar]
  15. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (Vol. 2). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  16. Curran, M. A., Hazen, N. L., & Mann, T. (2009). Representations of marriage and expectations of parenthood: Predictors of supportive co-parenting for first-time parents. Parenting: Science and practice, 9(1-2), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295190802656794 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Demo, D. H. & Fine, M. A. (2010). Beyond The Average Divorce. Sage. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dillon, H. N. (2005). Family violence and divorce: Effects on marriage expectations[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. East Tennessee State University. [Google Scholar]
  19. Downey, G. & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1. [Google Scholar]
  20. Downey, G., Bonica C. & Rincon, C. (1999). “Rejection Sensitivity and Adolescent Romantic Relationship”, The Development of Romantic Relationship in Adolescence,ed. W. Furman, B. Brown & C. Feiring. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  22. Elibol, Ş., & Tok, E. S. S. (2019). Bağlanma stilleri, duygu düzenleme, reddedilme duyarlılığı, yakınlık korkusu ve kendini saklamanın kırılgan narsisizm ile ilişkisi. Ayna Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(2), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.31682/ayna.515625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. Erözkan, A. (2004). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin kişilerarası duyarlılıkları ile reddedilme duyarlılıklarının bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 85-98. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefad/issue/57226/808285 [Google Scholar]
  24. Erzen, E. (2016). Üç boyutlu bağlanma stilleri ölçeği. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 1-21. [Google Scholar]
  25. Feinstein, B. A., Goldfried, M. R., & Davila, J. (2012). The relationship between experiences of discrimination and mental health among lesbians and gay men: An examination of internalized homo negativity and rejection sensitivity as potential mechanisms. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 80(5), 917. [Google Scholar]
  26. Feldman, S., & Downey, G. (1994). Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the impact of childhood exposure to family violence on adult attachment behaviour. Development and Psychopathology, 6(1), 231-247. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gerdan, G.,& Murat, K. (2017). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Somatik Belirtiler, Bağlanma Stilleri ve Suçluluk Utanç Duyguları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 383-393. [Google Scholar]
  28. George, D. & Mallery, M. (2001). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 10.0 update. (3. Baskı). Allyn and Bacon [Google Scholar]
  29. Ger, S. (2021). Hatırlanan anne-baba kabul ve reddi ile ebeveyn öz yeterliği, evlilik doyumu ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkide temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların aracı rolü (Master's thesis, Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü). [Google Scholar]
  30. Greenberg, E., & Nay, W. (1982). The intergenerational transmission of marital instability reconsidered. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 44, 335-347. https://doi.org/10.2307/351543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Harper, M. S., Dickson, J. W., & Welsh, D. P. (2006). Self-silencing and rejection sensitivity in adolescent romantic relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(3), 435-443. [Google Scholar]
  32. Harvey, M., & Byrd, M. (2000). Relationship between adolescents’ attachment styles and family functioning. Adolescence, 35(138), 345-356. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.  [Google Scholar]
  34. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  35. Jones, G. D., & Nelson, E. S. (1996). Expectations of marriage among college students from intact and non-intact homes. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 26, 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v26n01_09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Karakaş, B. B. (2022, 7, 27). İstanbul’da kaç tane üniversite var? Univerlist. https://univerlist.com/tr/blog/istanbulda-kac-tane-universite-var. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kesebir, S., Kavzoğlu, S. Ö., & Üstündağ, M. F. (2011). Bağlanma ve psikopatoloji. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 3(2), 321-342. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kotan, T. Ş. (2016). Boşanmış ve boşanmamış ailelere sahip üniversite öğrencilerinde reddedilme duyarlılığının bağlanma stilleriyle ilişkisinin incelenmesi [Unpublished master's thesis]. Işık University. [Google Scholar]
  39. Köse, A. G., Ayça, Ö. Z. E. N., Ulaşan, E. T., & Özgüle, N. S. (2017). Reddedilme duyarlılığı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 5(11), 383-403.DOI: 10.7816/nesne-05-11-03 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lopez, F. G., Melendez, M. C., & Rice, K. G. (2000). Parental divorce, parent–child bonds, and adult attachment orientations among college students: A comparison of three racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(2), 177. [Google Scholar]
  41. McNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Expectancy confirmation in appraisals of marital interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 764-775. [Google Scholar]
  42. Nguyen, D. (2017, September 29). The Love of Divorce. The harsh reality of divorce around the world. https://www.unifiedlawyers.com.au/blog/global-divorce-rates-statistics/ [Google Scholar]
  43. Normansell, M. K., & Wisco, E. B. (2017). Negative interpretation bias as a mechanism of the relationship between rejection sensitivity and depressive symptoms. Cognition and Emotion, 31:5, 950-962. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1185395 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pietrzak, J., Downey, G., & Ayduk, O. (2005). Rejection Sensitivity as an Interpersonal Vulnerability. In M. W. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp. 62–84). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  45. Romero-Canyas, R., & Downey, G. (2005). Rejection sensitivity as a predictor of  behavioral responses to interpersonal stress. The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying, 131-154. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-13813-008 [Google Scholar]
  46. Romero‐Canyas, R., Downey, G., Berenson, K., Ayduk, O., & Kang, N. J. (2010). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection–hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of personality, 78(1), 119-148. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00611.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Sarıçam, H. (2011).Üniversite öğrencilerinin reddedilme duyarlılıkları ile benlik saygıları ve yalnızlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi.[Unpublished master's thesis]. Erzurum Atatürk University. [Google Scholar]
  48. Singh, A. S. (2017). Common procedures for development, validity and reliability of a questionnaire. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(5), 790-801. Http://İjecm.Co.Uk/ Issn 2348 0386  [Google Scholar]
  49. Soysal, F. Ö., Aslı, U. Z., & Aysan, F. (2016). Evlilik Beklentisi Ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 119-128. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17860/efd.80783 [Google Scholar]
  50. Oğuzlar, A. (2001). Alan Araştırmalarında Kayıp Değer Problemi ve Çözüm Önerileri, V. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı içinde (ss.1-30). Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar]
  51. Özen, D. Ş., & Güneri, F. K. (2018). İlişki başarısının temel belirleyicisi: Reddedilme duyarlılığı. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 10(4), 454-469. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.360041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  52. Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK).https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Evlenme-ve-Bosanma-Istatistikleri-2020-37211 [Google Scholar]
  53. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday [Google Scholar]
  54. Yıldız, M. (2017). Evlilik olgunluk ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi, 1(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.31461/ybpd.316274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  55. Yilmaz, V., & Dalbudak, Z. İ. (2018). Araci Değişken Etkisinin İncelenmesi: Yüksek Hizli Tren İşletmeciliği Üzerine Bir Uygulama.Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi.14(2), 517-534.https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2018239946 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]