International Journal of Progressive Education
ISSN (Print): 2834-7919 - ISSN (Online): 1554-5210

Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Progressive Education 2023, Vol. 19(2) 92-101

Teaching and Learning Conceptions of Pre-service English Language Teachers

Hilal Güneş

pp. 92 - 101   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2023.534.6

Publish Date: April 01, 2023  |   Single/Total View: 89/333   |   Single/Total Download: 138/505

PDF Download

Abstract

In this research, pre-service English language teachers' teaching and learning conceptions were explored with regards to gender and grade level. A total of 227 pre-service English language teachers studying at a state university in Turkey participated in the study. Data were collected through 'The Teaching and Learning Conceptions Questionnaire (TLCQ)' and analysed quantitatively. Results showed that pre-service English language teachers have higher level of constructivist conception when compared to traditional conception. In addition, a statistically significant difference was detected between the participants' constructivist conceptions and their gender, in favour of females. Also, the participants' traditional conceptions differed significantly based on grade level with lower-level participants having higher level of traditional conception. The study concluded with the discussion of the results in relation to the earlier research and offered some pedagogical implications and suggestions. This study attempts to be helpful for English language education policy-makers, teacher educators, teachers, and material designers.

Keywords: English Language Teaching (ELT), Teaching and Learning Conceptions, Constructivist Approach, Teacher Education

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Gunes, H. (2023). Teaching and Learning Conceptions of Pre-service English Language Teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(2), 92-101. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2023.534.6

Harvard
Gunes, H. (2023). Teaching and Learning Conceptions of Pre-service English Language Teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(2), pp. 92-101.

Chicago 16th edition
Gunes, Hilal (2023). "Teaching and Learning Conceptions of Pre-service English Language Teachers". International Journal of Progressive Education 19 (2):92-101. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2023.534.6

References
  1. Agola, E. (2004). Constructivist Versus Traditional Methods in Language Education. Perspectives In Learning, 5(1). 46-49. [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Muhaimeed, S. A. (2013). Task-based language teaching vs. traditional way of English language teaching in Saudi intermediate schools: A comparative study. [Doctoral Dissertation, Kent State University]. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=kent1383257660&disposition=inline [Google Scholar]
  3. Aljohani, M. (2017). Principles of “constructivism” in foreign language teaching. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 7(1). [Google Scholar]
  4. Aydın, Ö., Tunca, N., & Alkın-Şahin, S. (2015). Investigation of pre-service science teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in relation to some variables. K. Ü. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(3), 1331-1346. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aypay, A. (2011). The adaptation of the teaching-learning conceptions questionnaire and its relationships with epistemological beliefs. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(1), 7-29. [Google Scholar]
  6. Baş, G. (2014). Evaluation of elementary teachers’ teaching-learning conceptions from some variables. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 18-30. [Google Scholar]
  7. Baş, G., & Beyhan, Ö. (2013). Correlation between pre-service teachers’ teaching-learning conceptions and their student control ideologies. H. U. Journal of Education, Special issue (1), 14-26. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bıkmaz, F. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretme-öğrenme anlayışları ve bilimsel epistemolojik inançlarının araştırılması: Boylamsal bir çalışma. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(189), 183-196. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms (Revised ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. [Google Scholar]
  10. Büyükduman, F. İ. (2005). The opinions of elementary school English teachers on the English curriculum for elementary schools. H. U. Journal of Education, 28, 55-64. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817-831. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan, K. W., Tan, J., & Khoo, A. (2007). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions about teaching and learning: A closer look at Singapore cultural context. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 181-195. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, M. M. H., Chan, K-W., Tang, S. Y. F., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2009). Pre-service teacher education students' epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 319-327. [Google Scholar]
  14. Christensen, L.B., Johnson, R.B., & Turner, L.A. (2015). Research methods design and analysis. (12th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  16. Crandall, J. (1997). Language teaching approaches for school-aged learners in second language contexts. In G. R. Tucker & D. Corson (Eds.), Encypclopedia of language and education (pp. 75-84). Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  17. Demircan, O. (1988). Foreign language teaching in Turkey: Past to present. Remzi. [Google Scholar]
  18. Demirel, O. (2003). Foreign language teaching. Pegem Publications. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dunlop, J. C., & Grabinger, R. S. (1996). Rich environments for the active learning in higher education. In G. B. Wilson, (Ed.), Constructing learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 65-82). Educational Technology Publications. [Google Scholar]
  20. Engin, G., & Daşdemir, İ. (2015). Evaluation of primary school teachers’ teaching-learning conceptions with regards to different variables. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 33, 425-432. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gül, A. (2016). Constructivism as a new notion in English language education in Turkey [Doctoral dissertation, Kent University]. https://www-s3-live.kent.edu/s3fs-root/s3fs-public/file/Gul%20-%20Abstract.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. Güneş, H. & Karaazmak, F. (2017). Issues related to English language teaching at primary schools and suggested solutions. The Journal of International Social Research, 10(54), 731-737. [Google Scholar]
  23. Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N., & Purcell, S. (2000). The experience of constructivism: Transforming teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 455–465. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaufman, D. (2004). Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 303-319. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kavanoz, S. H. (2006). An exploratory study of English language teachers’ beliefs, assumptions, and knowledge about learner-centeredness. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 3-9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kırkgoz, Y. (2009). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(5), 663-684. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lamote, C., & Engels, N. (2010). The development of student teachers’ professional identity. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 3-18. [Google Scholar]
  28. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lau, W. W. F. (2021). Predicting pre-service mathematics teachers’ teaching and learning conceptions: The role of mathematical beliefs, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematics teaching efficacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 1141-1160. [Google Scholar]
  30. Löfström, E., & Poom-Valickis, K. (2013). Beliefs about teaching: persistent or malleable? A longitudinal study of prospective teachers’ beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 104-113. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mardiha, S. M., & Alibakhshi, G. (2020). Teachers’ personal epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching and learning: A correlational study. Cogent Education, 7(1). [Google Scholar]
  32. Marlowe, B. A., & Page, M. L. (2005). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom (2nd ed.). Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nikitina, L. (2010). Addressing pedagogical dilemmas in a constructivist language learning experience. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 90-106. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nunan, D. (2000). Language Teaching Methodology. Longman. [Google Scholar]
  36. Oğuz, A. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının demokratik değerleri ile öğretme ve öğrenme anlayışları. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(22), 139-160. [Google Scholar]
  37. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. (4th ed.). Open University Press. [Google Scholar]
  39. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. The Viking Press. [Google Scholar]
  40. Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers beliefs about teaching and learning: a constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354–395. [Google Scholar]
  41. Reinfried, M. (2000). Can radical constructivism achieve a viable basis for foreign language teaching?- A refutation of the ‘Wolff-Wendt’ theorem. Erfurt Electronic Studies in English, Retrieved from http://webdoc.gwdg.de/edoc/ia/eese/artic20/marcus/8_2000.html [Google Scholar]
  42. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2007). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schunk, D. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective (5th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sengupta, A. (2015). Generating content through online collaborative writing: a study. In G. Pickering & P. Gunasheka (Eds.), Innovation in English language teacher education: Selected papers from the fourth International teacher educator conference (pp. 56-65). British Council. [Google Scholar]
  45. Senemoğlu, N. (2004). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya (10. baskı). Gazi Kitabevi. [Google Scholar]
  46. Şahan, H. H., & Terzi, A. R. (2015). Analyzing the relationship between prospective teachers’ educational philosophies and their teaching- learning approaches. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(8), 1267-1275. [Google Scholar]
  47. Şahin, S., & Yılmaz, H. (2011). A confirmatory factor analysis of the teaching and learning conceptions questionnaire (TLCQ). Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(3), 194-200. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tang, S. Y. F., Wong, A. K. Y., & Cheng, M. M. H. (2012). Professional learning in initial teacher education: Vision in the constructivist conception of teaching and learning. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 38(4), 435-451. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, Instructional Design, and Technology: Implications for Transforming Distance Learning. Educational Technology and Society, 3(2). [Google Scholar]
  50. Turan, M. B. (2019). The relationship between university students' epistemological beliefs and teaching/learning conceptions. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(1), 184-194. [Google Scholar]
  51. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 19 (2)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 19 Issue 2

April 2023

All Manuscript

International Journal of Progressive Education

Copyright © 2025 International Journal of Progressive Education.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website were created using the BOQ™ - Intelligent Webverse System.