International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2023, Vol. 19(3) 120-133

Practice, Teaching, and Research Ethics in Special Education

Erhan Çetin & Emre Laçin

pp. 120 - 133   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2023.546.7   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2203-31-0005.R1

Published online: June 01, 2023  |   Number of Views: 156  |  Number of Download: 215


Abstract

Considering the lives of individuals with special needs, perhaps the most critical of the services provided is special education services. Having an extremely important place in the lives of these individuals and their relatives, special education services should be carried out within the framework of certain standards and ethical principles. Professional ethics, which pertain to the standards of conduct that individuals working in the realm of business should or should not exhibit, are of paramount importance in guiding employees on the principles that should be adhered to. Given that the field of special education is particularly sensitive in comparison to other disciplines, it is crucial for both teachers working in special education and researchers in this field to possess knowledge and skills pertaining to ethical principles. Despite its significance, there is a dearth of studies on the subject of special education ethics in Turkey. In light of the importance of this topic and the present situation in Turkey, this study aims to explore the concepts of ethics and professional ethics at a fundamental level. Specifically, the study delves into the specific realms of special education practice ethics, special education teaching ethics, and special education research ethics, and examines their place within the broader field of special education in the context of international literature. It is believed that the research conducted on this subject will be beneficial for both teachers, researchers, and service recipients in the interdisciplinary field of special education.

Keywords: Special Education, Practise Ethics, Teaching Ethics, Research Ethics


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Cetin, E. & Lacin, E. (2023). Practice, Teaching, and Research Ethics in Special Education . International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(3), 120-133. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2023.546.7

Harvard
Cetin, E. and Lacin, E. (2023). Practice, Teaching, and Research Ethics in Special Education . International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(3), pp. 120-133.

Chicago 16th edition
Cetin, Erhan and Emre Lacin (2023). "Practice, Teaching, and Research Ethics in Special Education ". International Journal of Progressive Education 19 (3):120-133. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2023.546.7.

References
  1. Akçamete, G., Kayhan, N., İşcen Karasu, F., Sardohan Yıldırım, A. E., & Şen, M. (2016). Professional ethical principles for special education teachers. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies 3(1), 27-44. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduijes/issue/20865/223879  [Google Scholar]
  2. Akdoğan, H. (2003, September 17-September 19). Meslek etiğinin kamuoyunu aydınlatmadaki önemine muhasebe meslek mensuplarının yaklasımları ve çorum ilinde uygulanan bir anket çalısması [The approaches of professional accountants to the importance of professional ethics in public disclosure and a survey study in Çorum] [Paper presentation] I. Ethics (Turkish Business and Professional Ethics) Meeting, Ankara, Hacettepe University, Turkey.  [Google Scholar]
  3. Altınkurt, Y. & Yılmaz, K. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlerin mesleki etik dışı davranışlar ile ilgili görüşleri [Prospective teachers’ views about teachers’ occupational unethical behaviours]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 1(22), 113-128. https://acikerisim.mehmetakif.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11672/217 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aydın, İ. (2021). Eğitim ve öğretimde etik [Ethics in education and training] (11th ed.). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aydın, İ. (2016). Yönetsel, mesleki ve örgütsel etik [Managerial, professional and organizational ethics] (7th ed.). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barker, R. A. (2002). An examination of organizational ethics. Human Relations 55(9), 1097-1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055009021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Berkeley, T. R., & Ludlow, B. L. (2008). Ethical dilemmas in rural special education: A call for a conversation about the ethics of practice. Rural Special Education Quarterly 27(1–2), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870508027001-202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F.  (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (24th ed.). Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  9. Byiers, B. J., Reichle, J., & Symons, F. J. (2012). Single-Subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 21(4), 97-414. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036) [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  10. Clarkburn, H. (2002). The aims and practise of ethics educationin in an undergraduate curriculumreasons for choosing a skills approach. Journal of Higher Education 26(4), 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877022000021711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Council for Exceptional Children (2002). CEC professional policy section four part 3 special purpose resolutions and government actions: position on preparation program accountability. VA: Author. [Google Scholar]
  12. Council for Exceptional Children (2008). What Every Special Educator Must Know: Ethics, Standards, and Guidelines (6th ed.). VA: Author. [Google Scholar]
  13. Council for Exceptional Children (2010). Council for exceptional children ethical principles for special education professional. Retrieved Fabruary 12, 2021, from https://exceptionalchildren.org/standards/ethical-principles-and-practice-standards  [Google Scholar]
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  15. Çevikbaş, R. (2006). Yönetimde etik ve yozlaşma [Ethics and corruption in management]. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 20(1), 265-289. Retrieved January 30, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atauniiibd/issue/2689/35359  [Google Scholar]
  16. De George, R. T. (2013). Business ethics (7th ed.). Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  17. Duke, D. L. (1990). Teaching: An ıntroduction. Mcgraw-Hill [Google Scholar]
  18. Fiedler, C. R., & Van Haren, B. (2009). A comparison of special education administrators’ and teachers’ knowledge and application of ethics and professional standards. The Journal of Special Education 43(3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466908319395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Frankel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to evaluate & design research in education (8th ed.). MC-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H.  (2014). How to design and evaluate research in education (9th ed.). Mc Graw Hill. [Google Scholar]
  21. Goodlad, J. I. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gündüz, Y., & Coşkun, Z. S. (2012). Öğrenci algısına göre öğretmen etik değerler ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Development of teachers’ ethical values scale according to student perception: a study of validity and reliability]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 13(1), 111-131. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1492222  [Google Scholar]
  23. Harrison, C., & Killion, J. (2007). Ten roles for teacher leaders. Teachers as Leaders, 65(1), 74-77. Retrieved February 11, 2021, from https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/ten-roles-for-teacher-leaders  [Google Scholar]
  24. Haynes, F. (2002). Eğitimde etik [The ethical school: consequences, consistency and caring]. (S. K. Akbaş. Trans.). Ayrıntı Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  25. Heward, L. W. (2006). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (8th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  26. İşgüden, B. & Çabuk, A. 2006. Meslek etiği ve meslek etiğinin meslek yaşamı üzerindeki etkileri [Professional ethics and effects of professional ethics on business life]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9(16), 59-86. Retrieved February 5, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/863784  [Google Scholar]
  27. Kayıkçı, K. & Uygur, Ö. (2012). İlköğretim okullarının denetiminde mesleki etik (Bir durum çalışması) [The professional ethics of primary school supervision (A case study)]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 18(1), 65-94. Retrieved March 6, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/108183  [Google Scholar]
  28. Kellett, M., & Nind, M. (2001). Ethics in Quasi‐Experimental Research on People with Severe Learning Disabilities: Dilemmas And Compromises. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 29(2), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2001.00096.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Kınacı‐İnce, F. B. 2014. “Mesleki Etik İlkelere İlişkin Anadolu ve Meslek Lisesi Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri: İzmir İli Örneği.” (Unpublished master’s thesis). Okan Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kirk, A. S., Gallagher, J.J., Anastasiow, J. N., & Coleman, R. M. (2006). Educating exceptional children (12th ed.). Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]
  31. Köprü, B. (2007). Türk kamu yönetiminde etik değerlerden sapma ve yönetsel yozlaşma  [Deviation of ethics values and administrative corruption in Turkish public administration] (Publication No. 191085) [Master’s thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuzgun, Y. (2000). Meslek Danışmanlığı [Vocational Counseling]. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  33. Luckowski, J. A. (1997). A Virtue-Centered Approach to Ethics Education. Journal of Teacher Education 48(4), 264-270. Retrieved February 23, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487197048004004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği [Special Education Services Regulation]. (2018). T.C. Resmî Gazete, (30471), 7 July 2018, 22-78. [Google Scholar]
  35. National Education Association. (1975). Code of ethics of the education profession. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://www.nea.org/resource-library/code-ethics-educators  [Google Scholar]
  36. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Validity, reliability and ethics in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  37. Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  38. Overton, T. (2006). Assesseing learners with special needs: an applied approach (5th ed.). Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  39. Özdemir, M. (2008). Kamu yönetiminde etik [Ethics in public administration]. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 4(7), 179-195. Retrieved February 1, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1145044  [Google Scholar]
  40. Özgener, Ş. (2004). İş ahlakının temelleri: Yönetsel bir yaklaşım [Fundamentals of business ethics: A managerial approach]. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  41. Özmen, F. & Güngör, A. (2008). Eğitim denetiminde etik [Ethics in education supervision]. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 9(15), 137-155. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/92326  [Google Scholar]
  42. Pass, S., & Willingham, W. (2009). Teaching ethics to high school students. The Social Studies 100(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.100.1.23-30 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Paul, J., French, P. & Cranston-Gingras, A. (2001). Ethics and Special Education. Focus on Exceptional Children 34(1), 1-16. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from https://www.proquest.com/openview/6d7f6203884d805038f3c7b7b78b7d98/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=48488  [Google Scholar]
  44. Pelit, E., & Güçer, E. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğiyle ilgili etik olmayan davranışlara ve öğretmenleri etik dışı davranışa yönelten faktörlere ilişkin algılamaları [The perception of teacher candidates concerning unethical behaviours about teaching profession and factors incling teachers unethical behaviour]. Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 1(2), 95-119. Retrieved January 25, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gaziticaretturizm/issue/49900/639594  [Google Scholar]
  45. Pieper, A. (1999). Etiğe giriş [Introduction to ethics]. (V. Atayman & G. Sezer, Trans.) Ayrıntı Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sileo, N. M., Sileo, T. W., & Pierce, T. B. (2008). Ethical issues in general and special education teacher preparation: an interface with rural education. Rural Special Education Quarterly 27(1–2), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870508027001-208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. Strickland, B. B., & Turnbull, A. P. (1990). Developing and implementing individualized education programs. Merrill. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Merrill. [Google Scholar]
  49. Taylor, L. R. (2003). Assessment of exceptioanl students: Educational and psychological procedures (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tindal, G. A., & Marston, D. B. (1990). Classroombased assessment: Evaluating instructional outcomes. Merrill. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ülman, I. Y. (2010). Etik, biyoetik, hukuk: Temel kavramlar ve yaklaşımlar [Ethics, bioethics, law: Basic principles and main approaches]. [In Turkish]. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 1(1), 1-4. Retrieved January 23, 2021, from http://journal.acibadem.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/1701199  [Google Scholar]
  52. Ungaretti, T., Dorsey, A. G., Freeman, N. K., & Bologna, T. M. (1997). A teacher education ethics initiative: A collaborative response to a professional need. Journal of Teacher Education 48(4), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487197048004005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]