International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2023, Vol. 19(5) 14-25

Teaching Sequential Text Writing at Primary School by Using the Read-to-Write Strategy

Ömer Erbasan

pp. 14 - 25   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2308-18-0008.R1

Published online: October 16, 2023  |   Number of Views: 96  |  Number of Download: 153


The number of informative books and their content variety is increasing.  Today, students are exposed to informative texts more than ever before. Some learning outcomes in the Turkish Language Curriculum encourage students to discover the differences between text types and to write informative texts. This curriculum also recommends the inclusion of various types of informative text in the coursebooks. Yet, the number of studies on the development of informative text writing skills in Turkey is quite limited, and the need for research to help support students' ability to write informative texts is clear. As such, the present study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the "read-to-write" strategy, which is an informative text writing strategy, in teaching primary school students to write sequential informative texts. Applying the quasi-experimental method with pre-test post-test control group, the study was carried out in a village primary school in Afyonkarahisar. 33 primary school third grade students, 17 in the experimental group and 16 in the control group, participated in the study. The implementation of the research continued for 5 weeks and took 15 course hours. Before and after the intervention, the students were instructed to write sequential texts. A rubric prepared by Clark and Neal (2018) was used to collect the data. The six-item scoring key revealed the quality of the written texts. The collected data were analyzed with the help of a data analysis program using dependent samples t-test and independent samples t-test. The results clearly show that the read-to-write strategy is effective in writing sequential text type texts. After the intervention, the average of the scores of the students in the experimental group in which the read-to-write strategy was used increased significantly compared to the pre-intervention whereas no significant difference could be identified in the mean scores of the informative texts written by the students in the control group before and after the intervention. Finally, based on the research findings, various implications and suggestions are presented for educators and researchers.

Keywords: Read-to-Write Strategy, Informative Text, Writing, Primary School

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Erbasan, O. (2023). Teaching Sequential Text Writing at Primary School by Using the Read-to-Write Strategy . International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(5), 14-25. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2023.603.2

Erbasan, O. (2023). Teaching Sequential Text Writing at Primary School by Using the Read-to-Write Strategy . International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(5), pp. 14-25.

Chicago 16th edition
Erbasan, Omer (2023). "Teaching Sequential Text Writing at Primary School by Using the Read-to-Write Strategy ". International Journal of Progressive Education 19 (5):14-25. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2023.603.2.

  1. Akyol, H. (2020). Programa Uygun Türkçe Öğretim Yöntemleri (10th ed.). Pegem Akademi.  [Google Scholar]
  2. Beydoğan, H. Ö. (2011). Zihin haritası destekli bilişsel hazırlığın öğrencilerin bilgilendirici yazma yeterliği üzerine etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(4), 1-23.  [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, S. K., & Neal, J. (2018). Teaching second-grade students to write sequential text. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(6), 764-772. [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, S. K., Jones, C. D., & Reutzel, D. R. (2013). Using text structures of information books to teach   writing in the primary grades. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 265–271. doi: 10.1007/s10643-012-0547-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. De La Paz, S., Owen, B., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2000). Riding Elvis’s motorcycle: Using self-regulated strategy development to plan and write for a state writing exam. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
  6. Donovan, C. A. (2001). Children’s development and control of written story and informational genres: Insights from one elementary school. Research in the Teaching of English, 35(3), 394-447. [Google Scholar]
  7. Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202-224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Duke, N. K., & Kays, J. (1998). "Can I say 'once upon a time'?": Kindergarten children developing knowledge of information book language. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(2), 295-318. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  9. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E.  Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd .ed., pp. 205–242). International Reading Association. [Google Scholar]
  10. Duke, N. K., & Tower, C. (2004). Nonfiction texts for young readers. J. V. Hoffman & D. L. Schallert (Ed.), The texts in elementary classrooms (pp. 125-144). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  11. Erbasan, Ö. (2022). Yazma stratejilerinin özel yetenekli öğrencilerin bilgilendirici metin yazma becerilerine etkisi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ercan, İ. (2019). İş birlikli öğrenme yönteminin ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilgilendirici metin yazma becerilerine ve yazma tutumlarına etkisi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ergen, Y., & Batmaz, O. (2019). İlkokul 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama stratejilerini kullanma düzeyleri ile okuduğunu anlama başarıları arasındaki ilişki. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (49), 130-147. [Google Scholar]
  14. Filipenko, M. (2004). Constructing knowledge about and with informational texts: Implications for teacher-librarians working with young children. School Libraries Worldwide, 10(1/2), 21. [Google Scholar]
  15. Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457–478). Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  16. Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2012). Are attitudes toward writing and reading separable constructs? A study with primary grade children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(1), 51-69. [Google Scholar]
  17. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207–241. [Google Scholar]
  18. Helsel, L., & Greenberg, D. (2007). Helping Struggling Writers Succeed: A Self-Regulated Strategy Instruction Program. The Reading Teacher, 60, 752–760. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jam, B., & Shahin, L. (2012). Investigating the efficiency of two writing strategies among Iranian EFL learners: Translated writing vs. reading to write. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 67-81. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jeong, J., Gaffney, J. S., & Choi, J. O. (2010). Availability and use of informational texts in second-, third-, and fourth-grade classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 44, 435–456. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kana, F., & Şener, G. E. (2021). Yazma tekniklerinin ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilgilendirici metin yazma becerisine etkisi. Milli Eğitim, 50(231), 353-382. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kızgın, A., & Baştuğ, M. (2020). Okuma motivasyonu ve okuduğunu anlama becerisinin akademik başarıyı yordama düzeyi. Journal of Language Education and Research, 6(2), 601-612. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kletzien, S. B., & Szabo, R. J. (1998, December). Information text or narrative text? Children’s preferences revisited. In National Reading Conference, Austin, TX. [Google Scholar]
  24. MEB (Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı) (2019a). Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). MEB. [Google Scholar]
  25. MEB (2019b). PISA 2018 sonuçlarına göre Türkiye, her 3 alanda performansını artıran tek ülke. Retrieved August 14, 2022 from  [Google Scholar]
  26. MEB (2021). İlköğretim Kurumları (İlkokul ve Ortaokul) Haftalık Ders Çizelgesi’nde Değişiklik Yapılması. Sayı: 49. Retrieved August 17, 2022 from [Google Scholar]
  27. Moss, B. (2005). Making a case and a place for effective content area literacy instruction in the elementary grades. The Reading Teacher, 59(1), 46–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Moss, B., & Newton, E. (2002). An examination of the informational text genre in basal readers. Reading Psychology, 23(1), 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. Psychology Press. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ness, M. (2011). Teachers’ use of and attitudes toward informational text in K–5 classrooms. Reading Psychology, 32(1), 28-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Pappas, C.C., Varelas, M., Gill, S., Ortiz, I., & Keblawe-Shamah, N. (2009). Multimodal books in science-literacy units: Language and visual images for meaning making. Language Arts, 86(3), 201-217. [Google Scholar]
  32. Raby, S. R. (2006). Children’s literature in the elementary schools: Which books are being chosen for literacy instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, Brigham Young University. [Google Scholar]
  33. Reutzel, D. R., Jones, C. D., Clark, S. K., & Kumar, T. (2016). The Informational Text Structure Survey (ITS2): An exploration of primary grade teachers’ sensitivity to text structure in young children’s informational texts. Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 81–98. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.918927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Rosmawan, H. (2017). The analysis of student’s writing before and after the implementation of read-to-write approach. CaLLs (Journal of Culture, Arts, Literature, and Linguistics), 2(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  35. Smolkin, L. B., & Donovan, C. A. (2003). Supporting comprehension acquisition for emerging and struggling readers: The interactive information book read-aloud. Exceptionality, 11(2), 25–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Ungan, S. (2007). Yazma becerisinin geliştirilmesi ve önemi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(2), 461-472. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yılmaz, M. (2011). İlköğretim 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama seviyeleri ile Türkçe, Matematik, Sosyal Bilgiler ve Fen ve Teknoloji derslerindeki başarıları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilgiler Dergisi, 29, 9-14. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yopp, R. H., & Yopp, H. K. (2006). Informational texts as read-alouds at school and home. Journal of literacy Research, 38(1), 37-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  39. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., & Lauer, K. D. (2004). Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality, 12, 129–144. [Google Scholar]
  40. Williams, J. P., Nubla-Kung, A. M., Pollini, S., Stafford, K. B., Garcia, A., & Snyder, A. E. (2007). Teaching cause—effect text structure through social studies content to at-risk second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 111–120. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wollman-Bonilla, J. E. (2000). Teaching science writing to first graders: “Genre learning and recontextualization.” Research in the Teaching of English, 35(1), 35-65.  [Google Scholar]