- Berberoğlu, G., & Kalender, İ. (2005). Examining student success according to years, school types and regions: ÖSS and PISA analysis. Educational Sciences and Practice, 22(4), 21-35. [Google Scholar]
- Diken, E. H. (2014). Determining the cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by 9th grade students in the solution process of multiple choice questions in the field of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gazi University Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
- Diken, E. H., & Yuruk, N. (2019). Determining cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by 9th grade students before, while and after solving multiple-choice science questions. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 8(2), 1071-1099. [Google Scholar]
- Diken, E. H. (2020a). Cognitive and metacognitive strategies of 6th-grade students to answer multiple-choice questions on “human body systems”. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 12(2), 436-456. [Google Scholar]
- Diken, E. H. (2020b). the comparısıon between the cognıtıve and metacognıtıve strategıes used by 8th grade students to solve multıple-choıce questıons on “photosynthesıs and respıratıon”. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(4), 179-201. [Google Scholar]
- Diken, E. H. (2020c). The sources of cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by 7th grade students while reading the “cells and divisions” unit. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), 30-48. [Google Scholar]
- Diken, E. H. (2020d). A comparative study on the cognitive and metacognitive strategies of 6th grade private and state school students use while reading science texts. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(3), 1092-1109. [Google Scholar]
- Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive develop mental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. [Google Scholar]
- Gail, M. (1996). Problem solving about problem solving: framing a research agenda. Proceedings of the Annual National Educational Computing Conference, Minnesota, 17, 255-261. [Google Scholar]
- Hayes, J.R. (1981). The complete problem solver. Franklin Institute Press, Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
- Karacam, S., & Gursel, U. (2020). Examining the cognitive and metacognitive strategies used in question solving in terms of metacognitive awareness and conceptual understanding. Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal, 20(1), 415-438. [Google Scholar]
- Kumlu, G. (2012). Cognitive and metacognitive strategies that become active when reading science texts in science and technology teacher candidates with alternative concepts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
- Malone, L. K. (2006). A comparative study of the cognitive and metacognitive differences between modeling and non-modeling high school physics students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Carregie Mellon, Pittsbuh, PA [Google Scholar]
- Mayer, R.E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem solving transfer. In D.C. Berliner, & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp.47-62). Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York. [Google Scholar]
- Mayer, R. E. (2003). Mathematical problem solving. In J. M. Royer, Mathematical Cognition (pp. 69-92). Information Age Publishing, Connecticut. [Google Scholar]
- MEB (2023). General directorate of measurement, evaluation and examination services, transition system to high schools. Retrieved from https://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/www/liselere-gecis-sistemi/icerik/1012 [Google Scholar]
- Simsek H., & Yildirim, A. (2006). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Seckin Publishing House, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
- Tutar, I. (2016). Determining the cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by 12th-grade students in solving multiple choice biology questions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ataturk University, Institute of Education Sciences, Erzurum. [Google Scholar]
- Tutar, I., Demir, Y., & Diken, E. H. (2020). Cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by the 12th grade students while solving biology questions. Trakya Education Journal, 10(2), 460-476. [Google Scholar]
- Unsal, Y., & Ergin, İ (2011). Problem solvıng strategıes usıng problem solvıng process ın scıence educatıon and an example applıcatıon. Military Academy Journal of Defense Sciences, 10(1) 72-91. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed.). we have thousand qaks, [Google Scholar]
- Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Yurttas Kumlu, G. F., & Yuruk, N. (2020). the effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategies that become activated while reading the expository science text on conceptual understanding. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35(1), 55-77. [Google Scholar]
- Yurttas Kumlu, G. F., & Yuruk, N. (2023). Investigation of cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by preservice science teachers exposed to explicit and peer tutoring reading strategies instruction. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(1), 1-24. [Google Scholar]
|
