International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2018, Vol. 14(4) 85-96

The Relationship Between Attitudes Towards Researchand Academic Dishonesty Tendencies of Pre-service Teachers

Adnan Taşgın

pp. 85 - 96   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.7   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1805-29-0003

Published online: September 11, 2018  |   Number of Views: 430  |  Number of Download: 1035


Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the research attitudes of the pre-service teachers and their academic dishonesty tendencies. This study employs a quantitative method with a correlational design consisting of 659 volunteer pre-service teachers from the faculty of education of a state university in East of Turkey. The data of the study were gathered through "Attitudes toward Research Scale" and "Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale". The analysis of the obtained data showed that there is a significant difference between the two genders in favor of the female pre-service teachers on both the attitudes towards research and the tendency of academic dishonesty. It was found that the academic dishonesty tendencies of the senior year pre-service teachers are higher than that of the sophomore year pre-service teachers. There is a negative meaningful relationship between the academic dishonesty tendencies of the pre-service teachers and their attitudes towards the research.

Keywords: Attitude towards research, academic dishonesty, pre-service teachers


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Tasgin, A. (2018). The Relationship Between Attitudes Towards Researchand Academic Dishonesty Tendencies of Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(4), 85-96. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.7

Harvard
Tasgin, A. (2018). The Relationship Between Attitudes Towards Researchand Academic Dishonesty Tendencies of Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(4), pp. 85-96.

Chicago 16th edition
Tasgin, Adnan (2018). "The Relationship Between Attitudes Towards Researchand Academic Dishonesty Tendencies of Pre-service Teachers". International Journal of Progressive Education 14 (4):85-96. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.7.

References
  1. Adams, N. A., & Holcomb, W. R. (1986). Analysis of the relationship between anxiety about mathematics and performance. Psychological Reports, 59, 943-948. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akbulut, Y., Uysal, Ö., Odabasi, H.F., & Kuzu, A. (2008). Influence of gender, program of study and pc experience on unethical computer using behaviors of turkish undergraduate students. Computers & Education, 51(2), 485–492. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beasley, E.M. (2016). Comparing the Demographics of students reported for academic dishonesty to those of the overall student population. Ethics & Behavior, 26(1), 45-62. DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2014.978977 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolin, B.L., Hag Lee, K., GlenMaye, L.F., & Yoon, D.P. (2012) Impact of research orientation on attitudes toward research of social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 48(2), 223-243. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, D. L. (2002). Cheating must be okay – everybody does ıt! Nurse Educator 27(1), 6-8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Butt, I. H. & Shams, J. A. (2013). Master in education student attitudes towards research: A comparison between two public sector universities in Punjab. South Asian Studies 28(1), 97-105. [Google Scholar]
  7. Center for Academic Integrity. (1999). The fundamental values of academic ıntegrity. Durham: Center for Academic Integrity. Retrieved on 06/07/17 from http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/home.php [Google Scholar]
  8. Cummings, R., Maddux, C. D., Harlow, S., & Dyas, L. (2002). Academic misconduct in undergraduate teacher education students and its relationship to their principled moral reasoning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(4), 286-296. [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Bertram Gallant, P. (2009). Cheating in school [Summary]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781444310252.fmatter/summary [Google Scholar]
  10. Eminoğlu, E., & Nartgün, Z. (2009). A scale development study to measure academic dishonesty tendency of university students. Journal of Human Sciences, 6(1), 215-240. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eret, E., & Ok, A. (2014). Internet plagiarism in higher education: Tendencies, triggering factors and reasons among teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 1002-1016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Finchilescu, G., & Cooper, A. (2017). Perceptions of Academic dishonesty in a South African university: A Q-Methodology approach. Ethics & Behavior, 00(00), 1-18. DOI:10.1080/10508422.2017.1279972 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gerdeman, R. D. (2000). Academic dishonesty and the community college, ERIC Digest, ED447840. Retrieved on 06/09/17 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED447840.pdf [Google Scholar]
  14. Graham, M., Monday, J.,  O’Brien, K., & Steffen. S. (1994). Cheating at small colleges: An examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 255-260. [Google Scholar]
  15. Happel, S. K., & Jennings, M.M. (2008). An economic analysis of academic dishonesty and its deterrence in higher education. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 25, 183–214. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1722.2008.00051.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Hensley, L.C., Kirkpatrick, K.M., & Burgoon, J.M. (2013). Relation of gender, course enrollment, and grades to distinct forms of academic dishonesty. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 895-907, DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827641  [Google Scholar]
  17. Hulsart, R. & McCarthy, V. (2011). Utilizing a culture of trust to promote academic integrity. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59, 92-96. [Google Scholar]
  18. Imran, A.M.,& Nordin, M.S. (2013). Predicting the underlying factors of academic dishonesty among undergraduates in public universities: A path analysis approach. J Acad Ethics, 11, 103-120. [Google Scholar]
  19. Iyer, R., & Eastman, J.K. (2006) Academic dishonesty: Are Business students different from other college students?. Journal of Education for Business, 82(2), 101-110. DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.82.2.101-110 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S. & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology 27 (2), 209-228. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1088.  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research (Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches) (5th ed.).  Los Angeles, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jurdi, R., Hage, H.S., & Chow, H.P.H. (2012). What behaviours do students consider academically dishonest? Findings from a survey of Canadian undergraduate students. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 1–23. Doi:10.1007/s11218-011- 9166-y. [Google Scholar]
  23. Krueger, L. (2014). Academic dishonesty among nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(2), 77-87. [Google Scholar]
  24. Macdonald, R. & Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism – a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 233- 245. [Google Scholar]
  25. McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (1984). Research in education: A Conceptual introduction. Boston: Little Brown. [Google Scholar]
  26. Morgenshtern, M., Freymond, N., Agyapong, S., & Greeson, C. (2011). Graduate social work students' attitudes toward research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31(5), 552-568, DOI: 10.1080/08841233.2011.615287. [Google Scholar]
  27. Myrick, F. (2004) Pedagogical integrity in the knowledge economy. Nursing Philosophy, 5, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  28. Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A. & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual Differences in Student Cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 229-241. doi:10.1037/0022- 0663.88.2.229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Nonis, S. & Swift, C.O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69-77. [Google Scholar]
  30. Papanastasiou, E.C. (2005). Factor structure of the “attitudes toward research” scale. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 16-26. [Google Scholar]
  31. Petress, K. C. (2003). Academic dishonesty: A plague on our profession. Education, 123(3), 624–627. [Google Scholar]
  32. Raffetto, W. G. (1985). The cheat. Community and Junior College Journal, 56(2), 26–27. [Google Scholar]
  33. Robson, C. (2013). Real world research (3rd edt.). Chichester: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  34. Shavelson, R.J. (1996). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shavelson, R.J. & Towne, L. (2002), Scientific research in education. Washington: National Academy Pres. [Google Scholar]
  36. Shkedi, A. (1998). Teachers' attitudes towards research: A challenge for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 559-577. [Google Scholar]
  37. Simon, J.L., & Burstein, P. (1985). Basic research methods in social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Random House. [Google Scholar]
  38. Straw, D. (2002). The plagiarism of generation ‘why not?’. Community College Week,14(24), 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  39. Szabo, A., & Underwood, J. (2004).  Cybercheats: Is information and communication technology fuelling academic dishonesty? Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 180-199. [Google Scholar]
  40. Thomas, D. (2017).  Factors that explain academic dishonesty among university students in Thailand. Ethics & Behavior, 27(2), 140-154, DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2015.1131160. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wangaard, D.B., & Stephens, J.M. (2011). Creating a culture of academic integrity: A toolkit for secondary schools. Minneapolis: Search Institute [Google Scholar]
  42. Wideman, M.A. (2008). Academic dishonesty in postsecondary education: A literatüre review. Transformative Dialgues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 2(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  43. Whiteman, S.A., & Gordon, J.L. (2001). The price of an “A”: An educator’s responsibility to academic honesty. English Journal, 91(2), 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  44. Williams, D. & Coles, L. (2003). The use of research by teachers: Information literacy, access and attitudes. Scotland: Department of Information Management, Aberdeen Business School, The Robert Gordon University. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yapalak, S., & Ilgaz, G. (2013). The adaptarion of “Attitudes toward Research (ATR)” scale into Turkish. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 79-90. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yang, S.C. (2012). Attitudes and behaviors related to academic dishonesty: A survey of Taiwanese graduate students. Ethics & Behavior, 22(3), 218-237, DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2012.672904 [Google Scholar]
  47. Yardley, J. Rodríguez, M. D., Bates, S.C., & Nelson, J. (2009). True confessions?: Alumni's retrospective reports on undergraduate cheating behaviors. Ethics & Behavior, 19(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.1080/10508420802487096 [Google Scholar]