Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Progressive Education 2024, Vol. 21(1) 28-41

Changing from a Two-Model System back to a One-Model System: A Qualitative Study on an International Baccalaureate (IB) Middle Years Program English Department from the Perceptions of the Teachers as the School Responds to Educational Reforms and IB Requirements

John Clark, Matthew Terrett

pp. 28 - 41   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2024.1163.3

Publish Date: February 11, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 19/12   |   Single/Total Download: 19/12


Abstract

International Baccalaureate (IB) Chinese Internationalised Schools who teach compulsory education are tasked with meeting the demands of both the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the IB. This follow-up study documents the transition of a Middle Years Program English department from a Two-Model System back to a One-Model System to meet requirements of both respective authorities. Advantages of the One-Model System are presented including communication, but continued disadvantages highlighted in the Two-Model system are also present, specifically the appropriateness of the MYP for students of low level English ability. Assessment tensions are underscored with school leadership forcing MYP teachers to inflate MYP summative assessment scores while also requiring teachers to implement unstandardized in-house Chinese National Curriculum ‘based’ examinations. Scores from both forms of assessment were used interchangeably as a measurement to determine student phasing. Reasons for these assessment policy changes were related to parents, marketing, and preparation for Chinese national examinations. The use of inflated MYP assessment scores and non-standardized in-house examinations raises questions about the legitimacy of this CIS’s MYP English teaching and learning practices and perhaps the greater Chinese context as CIS who to teach the MYP implement policies to meet MOE CNC examination requirements.

Keywords: International Baccalaureate, Chinese Internationalised Schools, Two-Model System, One-Model System, Assessment


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Clark, J., & Terrett, M. (2024). Changing from a Two-Model System back to a One-Model System: A Qualitative Study on an International Baccalaureate (IB) Middle Years Program English Department from the Perceptions of the Teachers as the School Responds to Educational Reforms and IB Requirements. International Journal of Progressive Education, 21(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2024.1163.3

Harvard
Clark, J. and Terrett, M. (2024). Changing from a Two-Model System back to a One-Model System: A Qualitative Study on an International Baccalaureate (IB) Middle Years Program English Department from the Perceptions of the Teachers as the School Responds to Educational Reforms and IB Requirements. International Journal of Progressive Education, 21(1), pp. 28-41.

Chicago 16th edition
Clark, John and Matthew Terrett (2024). "Changing from a Two-Model System back to a One-Model System: A Qualitative Study on an International Baccalaureate (IB) Middle Years Program English Department from the Perceptions of the Teachers as the School Responds to Educational Reforms and IB Requirements". International Journal of Progressive Education 21 (1):28-41. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2024.1163.3

References

    Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.
    Bunnell, T. (2020). The continuous growth and development of ‘International Schooling’: The notion of a ‘transitionary phase, Compare : A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(5), 764-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1712890
    Clark, J. S., & Terrett, M. (2024). A qualitative case study of teachers’ Perceptions on a Two-model system; Adhering to Chinese and International Baccalaureate mandated standards. Journal of Research in International Education, 23(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/14752409241242688
    Cambridge Assessment English. (2019) Comparing scores to IELTS B2 First and C1 Advanced.
    https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/461626-cambridge-english-qualifications-comparing-scores-to-ielts.pdf 
    CPC Central Committee and State Council. (2019) Opinions on deepening educational reform and improving the quality of compulsory education. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-07/08/content_5407361.htm 
    Deng, L., Wu, S.Y., Chen, Y.M., & Peng Z.M. (2023). Threat or necessity: an analysis of the development of International Baccalaureate education in Shanghai, Educational Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2182761
    Dickson, A., Perry, L.B., & Ledger, S. (2020). Letting go of the Middle Years Programme: Three schools’ rationales for discontinuing an International Baccalaureate Program. Journal of Advanced Academics 31(1): 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X198690
    Gaskell, R. (2019). The growing popularity of international K-12 schools in China. ICF Monitor. https://monitor.icef.com/2019/04/growing-popularity-of-international-k-12-schools-in-china/
    Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning. Implicit and explicit learning of languages, 48, 443-482.
    International Baccalaureate (IB) (2020) MYP Language Acquisition Guide.
    Keeling, A. (2019) Education in China. International Teacher Magazine. https://consiliumeducation.com/itm/2019/04/03/education-in-china/
    Ministry of Education (MOE). (2020) Measures for the management of textbooks at primary and secondary schools. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-01/07/content_5467235.htm?ivk_sa=1023197a 
    Perry, L., Ledger, S., & Dickson, A. (2018). What are the benefits of the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme for teaching and learning? Perspectives from stakeholders in Australia. International Baccalaureate Organisation. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31434.41925
    Poole, A. (2016). “Complex teaching realities’ and ‘deep rooted cultural traditions: Barriers to the implementation and internalisation of formative assessment in China, Cogent Education, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1156242
    Poole, A. (2020). Decoupling Chinese internationalised schools from normative constructions of the international school, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(3), 447-454,  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1682839
    Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/259261
    Sizmur, J., & Cunningham, R. (2013). International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme (MYP) in the UK. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research. https://www.ibo.org/globalassets/new-structure/research/pdfs/ibmyp-finalnferreport-plussupplementaryanalyses2.pdf
    Wright, E., Lin, C., & Lu, J.Y. (2022a). The turning tide of the International Baccalaureate in China: when global dreams meet national priorities, Globalisation, Societies and Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2115342
    Wright, E., Ma, Y., & Auld, E. (2022b). Experiments in being global: The cosmopolitan nationalism of international schooling in China. Globalisation, Societies and Education. 20(2), 236-249.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1882293
    Wu, W., & Koh, A. (2022a). Being ‘international’ differently: a comparative study of transnational approaches to international schooling in China. Educational Review. 74(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1887819
    Wu, W., & Koh, A. (2022b). Reining in the international: How state and society localised international schooling in China. British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2022.2048630