International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210
International Journal of Progressive Education
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2019, Vol. 15(1) 167-183

The Relationship between Solution-Focused School Leadership and Organizational Cynicism, Organizational Commitment and Teachers' Job Satisfaction

Güven Özdem & Şenol Sezer

pp. 167 - 183   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.184.11   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1811-09-0001

Published online: February 06, 2019  |   Number of Views: 512  |  Number of Download: 1147

Save PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between solution-focused school leadership and organizational cynicism, organizational commitment and teachers’ job satisfaction.  This study was designed in correlational survey model. The sample group was 246 teachers working in different schools. The sample group was determined by using cluster random sampling method. Data were collected via the four scales: Solution-Focused School Leadership Scale, Organizational Cynicism Scale, Organizational Commitment Scale, and short form of the Minnesota Job Satisfaction Scale. The results show that the teachers perceive a high level solution-focused leadership in the schools. The results also show that teachers have low level organizational cynicism, but high level organizational commitment and job satisfaction. It was found a high level statically significant negative correlations between the teachers’ organizational cynicism and school principals’ solution-focused leadership according to multiple regression analysis results. In addition, a high level statically significant positive correlations were found between the teachers’ organizational commitment and school principals’ solution-focused leadership. Moreover, a high level statically significant positive correlations were found between the teachers’ job satisfaction and school principals’ solution-focused leadership. The results also show that solution-focused leadership scores and organizational commitment scores differ statistically in favor of female teachers.  

Keywords: Solution-focused leadership, Organizational cynicism, Commitment, Satisfaction, Correlation.

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Ozdem, G. & Sezer, S. (2019). The Relationship between Solution-Focused School Leadership and Organizational Cynicism, Organizational Commitment and Teachers' Job Satisfaction . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(1), 167-183. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2019.184.11

Harvard
Ozdem, G. and Sezer, S. (2019). The Relationship between Solution-Focused School Leadership and Organizational Cynicism, Organizational Commitment and Teachers' Job Satisfaction . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(1), pp. 167-183.

Chicago 16th edition
Ozdem, Guven and Senol Sezer (2019). "The Relationship between Solution-Focused School Leadership and Organizational Cynicism, Organizational Commitment and Teachers' Job Satisfaction ". International Journal of Progressive Education 15 (1):167-183. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2019.184.11.
References
  1. Akın, U. (2015). The relationship between organizational cynicism and trust in schools: A research on teachers. Education and Science, 40 (181), 175-189. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2015.4721  [Google Scholar]
  2. Alemi, B. (2014). Job satisfaction among Afghan teacher educators. Unpublished master’s thesis. Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Karlstad, Afghanistan.    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63 (1), 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  4. Altınkurt, Y., Yılmaz, K., Erol, E., & Salalı, E. T. (2014). Okul müdürlerinin kullandığı güç kaynakları ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel sinizm algıları arasındaki ilişki. [Relationship between school principals’ use of power sources and teachers’ organizational cynicism perceptions]. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 3 (1), 25-52. [Google Scholar]
  5. Andresson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49 (11), 1395-1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604901102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Arnold, J., Randall, R., & Patterson, F. (2010). Work psychology: Understanding human behaviour in the workplace (5th Ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aslan, H., & Yılmaz, E. (2013). The study of teachers’ general cynicism inclinations in terms of life satisfaction and other variables. Creative Education, 4 (9), 588-591. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aydın, M. (1993). Çağdaş eğitim denetimi. [Contemporary educational supervision]. (3. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ayele, D. (2014). Teachers’ job satisfaction and commitment in general secondary schools of Hadiya Zone, in southern nation nationality and people of regional state. Unpublished master’s thesis. Jimma University Institute of Education and Professional Development Studies, Jimma, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bağrıyanık, H. (2016). Öğretmenlerin iş değerleri ile örgütsel bağlılık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between teachers’ job values and organizational commitment levels].Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14 (1), 69-84. [Google Scholar]
  11. Balay, R. (2000).Yönetici ve öğretmenlerde örgütsel bağlılık. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. [Google Scholar]
  12. Baycan, F. A. (1985). Farklı gruplarda çalışan gruplarda iş doyumunun bazı yönlerinin analizi. [The analysis of some of the dimensions of job satisfaction in working groups and in different groups]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bayram, L. (2005). Yönetimde yeni bir paradigma: Örgütsel bağlılık. [A new paradigm in management: Organizational commitment]. Sayıştay Dergisi, 16 (59), 125-139. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bozkurt, Ö., & Yurt, İ. (2013). Akademisyenlerin örgütsel bağlılık düzeylerini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. [A study to determine the organizational commitment level of the academicians]. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11 (22), 121-139. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R. and Dean Jr., J.W. (1999). Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisior perspectives on work outcomes. In, P. Elsass & J. Harmon. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Academy of Management. (pp.1-33). Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bridges, E. M., & Hallinger, P. (1997). Using problem-based learning to prepare educational leaders. Peabody Journal of Education, 72 (2), 131-146. [Google Scholar]
  17. Buluç, B. (2009). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre okul müdürlerinin liderlik stilleri ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki. [The relationships between organizational commitment and leadership styles of principals based on elementary school teacher’s perceptions]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 15 (57), 5-34. [Google Scholar]
  18. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. [Data analysis manual for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  19. Büyükgöze, H., & Özdemir, M. (2017). İş doyumu ile öğretmen performansı ilişkisinin Duygusal Olaylar Kuramı çerçevesinde incelenmesi. [Examining Job satisfaction and teacher performance within Affective Events Theory]. Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18 (1), 311-325. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.307041  [Google Scholar]
  20. Cavanagh, M. (2008). Creating flourishing leadership through developmental coaching. First Australian Positive Psychology and Well-Being Conference, 5-6 April, 2008, Sydney, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  21. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Araştırma deseni. [Research design]. (Trans. Ed. S. B. Demir). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap. [Google Scholar]
  22. Çanak, M. (2014). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin iş doyumlarının incelenmesi. [An analysis on job satisfaction of teachers who work in high school institutions]. Türkiye Sosyal Politika ve Çalışma Hayatı Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4 (7), 7-26. [Google Scholar]
  23. Çavuş, Ş., & Abdıldaev, M. (2014). Kırgızistan devlet üniversitelerinde çalışan öğretim elemanlarının iş doyumu. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(3), 11-24. www.turje.org [Google Scholar]
  24. Çöl, G., & Gül, H. (2005). Kişisel özelliklerin örgütsel bağlılık üzerine etkileri ve kamu üniversitelerinde bir uygulama. [The effects on the organizational commitment of personal traits and an application in public universities]. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19 (1), 291-306. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dean, Jr, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. The Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. DeJong, P., & Berg, I. K. (1998). Interviewing for solutions. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole. [Google Scholar]
  27. DeJong, P., & Berg, I. K. (2002). Interviewing for solutions. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth. [Google Scholar]
  28. Demirtaş, Z., Özdemir, T. Y., & Küçük, Ö. (2016). Okulların bürokratik yapısı, örgütsel sessizlik ve örgütsel sinizm arasındaki ilişki. [Relationships between bureaucratic structure of schools, organizational silence and organizational cynicism]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 22 (2), 193-216. [Google Scholar]
  29. DeShazer, S. (1988). Clues: Investigating solutions in brief therapy. New York: Norton & Co. [Google Scholar]
  30. De Witte, H., & Buitendach, J. H. (2005). Job insecurity, extrinsic and intrinsic job satisfaction and affective organisational commitment of maintenance workers in a parastatal. South African Journal of Business Management, 36 (2), 27-37. [Google Scholar]
  31. Doğan, S., & Uğurlu, C. T. (2014). Okul yöneticilerinin etik liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel sinizm algıları arasındaki ilişki [Relationship between ethical leadership behaviors of school administrators and teachers perceptions about organizational cynicism]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34 (3), 489-516. [Google Scholar]
  32. Duclos, M. (2006). Solution-focused leadership through appreciation. In, Gunter Lueger, & Hans Peters Korn, (Eds.). Solution focused management. (pp.123-134). München: Rainer Hampp Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ereş, F., & Akyürek, M. İ. (2016). İlkokul müdürlerinin dağıtılmış liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin iş doyumu algıları arasındaki ilişki düzeyleri. [Relationship levels between distributed leadership behaviors of principals and the teachers’ perception of job satisfaction]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36 (3): 427-449. [Google Scholar]
  34. Eryeşil, K., & Fındık, M. (2012). Örgütsel sinizmin örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. International Iron & Steel Symposium, 02-04 April 2012, Karabük, Türkiye. [Google Scholar]
  35. Firoozi, M., Mokhtari, A., & Mokhtari, G. (2016). The relationship between organizational cynicism and innovative behaviors of sport and youth offices in Hamedan province. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 4 (3), 295-303. DOI: 0.14486/IntJSCS519 [Google Scholar]
  36. Franklin, C., Streeter, L., Kim, J. S., & Tripodi, S. J. (2007). The effectiveness of a solution-focused, public alternative school for dropout prevention and retrieval. Children & Schools, 29 (3), 133-144. [Google Scholar]
  37. Freankel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in edition. (7th Ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ghenghesh, P. (2013). Job satisfaction and motivation: What makes teachers tick? British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 3 (4), 456-466, Retrieved April 1, 2018, from www.sciencedomain.org [Google Scholar]
  39. Godat, D. (2013). Solution focused leadership – the other side of the elephant: Four distinctions between SFL and SF coaching. InterAction-The Journal of Solution Focus in Organisations, 5 (2), 20-34. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gören, T. (2012). İlköğretim kurumlarında görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılık düzeyleri. Unpublished master’s thesis. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gören, T., & Yengin-Sarpkaya, P. (2014). İlköğretim kurumlarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılık düzeyleri (Aydın ili örneği). [The level of organizational commitment of the teachers in primary schools in Aydın]. Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 26 (40), 69-87. DOI: 10.15285/EBD.2014409743 [Google Scholar]
  42. Grant, A. M., & Spence, G. B. (2010). Using coaching and positive psychology to promote a flourishing workforce: A model of goal-striving and mental health. In, P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Page (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work (pp. 175-188). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  43. Günbayı, İ., & Tokel, A. (2012). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin iş doyumu ve iş stresi düzeylerinin karsılaştırmalı analizi. [A comparative analysis of compulsory school teachers’ job satisfaction and job stress levels.]. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Arastırmaları Dergisi, 3 (5), 77-95. [Google Scholar]
  44. Güney, S., (2011). Örgütsel davranış. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. [Google Scholar]
  45. Iveson, C., George, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). Brief coaching: A solution-focused approach. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jackson, P. Z., & McKergow, M. (2007). The solutions focus. London: Nicholas Brealey. [Google Scholar]
  47. James, M. S. L. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of cynicism in organizations: An examination of the potential positive and negative effects on school systems. Unpublished doctorate dissertation. The Florida State University, College of Business, Florida, USA. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kalağan, G. (2009). Araştırma görevlilerinin örgütsel destek algıları örgütsel sinizm tutumları arasındaki ilişki. Unpublished master’s thesis, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Antalya. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kalağan, G., & Güzeller, C. O. (2010). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel sinizm düzeylerinin incelenmesi. [The organizational cynicism levels of the teachers]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15 (27), 83-97. [Google Scholar]
  50. Karacaoğlu, K., & İnce, F. (2012). Brandes, Dharwadkar ve Dean’in (1999) Örgütsel Sinizm Ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması: Kayseri Organize Sanayi Bölgesi örneği. Business and Economics Research Journal, 3 (3), 77-92. [Google Scholar]
  51. Karataş, H., & Güleş, H. (2010). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin iş tatmini ile örgütsel bağlılığı arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between primary school teachers' job satisfaction and organizational commitment]. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (2), 74-89. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30 (7), 865-878. DOI:  10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kelly, M. S., Kim, J. S., & Franklin, C. (2008). Solution-focused brief therapy in schools: A 360-degree view of research and practice. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kılıç, Ş. (2011). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin örgütsel sinizm ve örgütsel bağlılık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki: Keçiören ilçesi örneği. [The relationship between the levels of organizational cynicism and organizational commitment of primary school teachers (Example of Kecioren District)]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  55. Köybaşı, F., Uğurlu, C. T., & Öncel, A. (2017). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel adalet algilari ile örgütsel sinizm düzeyleri arasindaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. [Examining the relationship between teachers' organizational justice perceptions and organizational cynicism levels]. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (1), 1-14. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.285527. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kumah, A., & Boachie, W. K. (2017). Teacher job satisfaction as a motivational tool for school effectiveness: An assessment of private basic schools in Ghana. International Journal of Research Science & Management, 4 (3), 10-21. Retrieved April 1, 2018, from http://www.ijrsm.com  [Google Scholar]
  57. Kumaş, V., & Deniz, L. (2010). Öğretmenlerin iş doyum düzeylerinin incelenmesi. [An investigation about job satisfaction of teachers]. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 32, 123-139. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Barton, S. M. (2002). Satisfied correctional staff: A review of the literature on the correlates of correctional staff job satisfaction. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29 (2), 115-143. DOI: 10.1177/0093854802029002001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design. (9th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Educational International. [Google Scholar]
  60. Leung, K., Ip, O. K. M., & Leung, K-K. (2010). Social cynicism and job satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis. Applied Psychology, 59 (2), 318-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00392.x [Google Scholar]
  61. Lueger, G. (2006). Solution-focused management: Towards a theory of positive differences. In, Gunter Lueger, & Hans Peters Korn, (Eds.). Solution focused management. (pp.1-14). München: Rainer Hampp Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  62. Mete, Y. A., & Serin, H. (2015). Okul yöneticilerinin babacan liderlik davranışı ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel sinizm davranışları arasındaki ilişki. [Relationship between school administrators’ paternalist leadership behaviours and teachers’ organizational citizenship and organizational cynicism behaviours]. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 12 (2), -2, s.147-159. [Google Scholar]
  63. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  64. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. M. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14 (2), 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  65. Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39 (7), 803-832. DOI: 10.1177/0095399707305546. [Google Scholar]
  66. Msuya, O. W. (2016). Exploring levels of job satisfaction among teachers in public secondary schools in Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 8 (2), 9-16, DOI: 10.5897/IJEAPS2015.0435 [Google Scholar]
  67. Mullins, L. J. (2005). Management and organizational behaviour. (7th Ed.). UK: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar]
  68. Okeke, C. I., & Mtyuda, P. N. (2017). Teacher job dissatisfaction: Implications for teacher sustainability and social transformation. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19 (1), 54-68. DOI: 10.1515/jtes-2017-0004 [Google Scholar]
  69. Ololube, N. P. (2006). Teachers’ job satisfaction and motivation for school effectiveness: An assessment. Retrieved April, 2, 2018, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED496539 [Google Scholar]
  70. Özdem, G. (2012). The relationship between the organizational citizenship behaviors and the organizational and professional commitments of secondary school teachers. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 6 (2), 47-64, DOI: 10.20460/JGSM.2012615773 [Google Scholar]
  71. Özgan, H., Külekçi, E., & Özkan, M. (2012). Analyzing of the relationships between organizational cynicism and organizational commitment of teaching staff. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4 (1), 196-205. [Google Scholar]
  72. Özkalp, E., & Kırel, Ç. (2001). Örgütsel davranış. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim, Sağlık ve Bilimsel Araştırma Çalışmaları Vakfı Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  73. Özler, D. E., Atalay, C. G., & Şahin, M. D. (2010). Örgütlerde sinizm güvensizlikle mi bulaşır? [Does the cynicism contaminate in organızations with distrustfulness?]. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (2), 47-57. [Google Scholar]
  74. Özler, D. E., & Atalay, C. G. (2011). A research to determine the relationship between organizational cynicism and burnout levels of employees in health sector. Business and Management Review, 1 (4), 26-38. [Google Scholar]
  75. Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  76. Pratkanis, A. R., & Turner, M. E. (1996). The proactive removal of discriminatory barriers: Affirmative action as effective help. Journal of Social Issues, 52 (4), 111-132. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1996.tb01853.x  [Google Scholar]
  77. Roeden, J. M., Maaskant, M. A., Bannink, F. P., & Curfs, L. M. (2011). Solution-focused brief therapy with people with mild intellectual disabilities: A case series. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 8 (4), 247-255. [Google Scholar]
  78. Röhrig, P. (2006). Advanced training for basic leadership skills. In, Gunter Lueger, & Hans Peters Korn, (Eds.). Solution focused management. (pp.147-156). München: Rainer Hampp Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sağır, T., & Oğuz, E. (2012). Öğretmenlere yönelik örgütsel sinizm ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Developing of organizational cynicism scale for teachers]. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9 (2), 1094-1106. [Google Scholar]
  80. Scott, K. A., & Zweig, D. (2008). Dispositional predictors of organizational cynicism. 51th Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, 24-27 May, 2008, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  81. Serin, M. K., & Buluç, B. (2012). İlköğretim okul müdürlerinin öğretim liderliği davranışları ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişki. [The relationship between instructional leadership and organizational commitment in primary schools]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 18 (3), 435-459. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sezer, Ş. (2017). Solution-focused school leadership scale: A validity and reliability study. Psychology Research, 7 (2), 95-103. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sezgin-Nartgün, Ş., & Menep, İ. (2010). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığa ilişkin algı düzeylerinin incelenmesi: Şırnak/İdil örneği. [The analysis of perception levels of elementary school teachers with regard to organizational commitment: Şırnak / İdil case]. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (1), 288-316. [Google Scholar]
  84. Sezgin-Nartgün, Ş., & Kartal, V. (2013). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel sinizm ve örgütsel sessizlik hakkındaki görüşleri. [Teachers’ perceptions on organizational cynicism and organizational silence]. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2 (2), 47-67.   [Google Scholar]
  85. Singh, B., Gupta, P. K., & Venugopal, S. (2008). Organisational commitment: Revisited. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 34 (1), 57-68. [Google Scholar]
  86. Sklare, G. B. (2005). Brief counselling that works: A solution-focused approach for school counsellors and administrators. California: Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
  87. Smock, S. A., McCollum, E. E., & Stevenson, M. L. (2010). The development of the solution building inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36 (4), 499-510. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00197.x [Google Scholar]
  88. Sonmezer, M. G. & Eryaman, M. Y. (2008). A comparative analysis of job satisfaction levels of public and private school teachers. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4(2), 20-33. [Google Scholar]
  89. Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, cause, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  90. Stavrova, O, & Ehlebracht, D. (2016).  Cynical beliefs about human nature and income: Longitudinal and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110 (1), 116-132. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000050 [Google Scholar]
  91. Steinmüller, H. (2014). A minimal definition of cynicism: everyday social criticism and some meanings of 'Life' in contemporary China. Anthropology of This Century, 4(11), 1-14. Retrieved March, 30, 2018, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/59999 [Google Scholar]
  92. Taşdan, M., & Tiryaki, E. (2008). Comparison of the level of job satisfaction between at private and state primary school teachers. Education and Science, 33 (147), 54-69. [Google Scholar]
  93. Tayfun, A., & Çatır, O. (2014). Hemşirelerin örgütsel sinizm düzeylerinin incelenmesi.  [Organizational cynicism levels of the nurses]. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6 (1), 247-365. [Google Scholar]
  94. Turner, J. H., & Valentine, S. R. (2001). Cynicism as a fundamental dimension of moral decision-making: A scale development. Journal of Business Ethics, 34 (2), 123-136. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012268705059 [Google Scholar]
  95. Türköz, T., Polat, M., & Coşar, S. (2013). Çalışanların örgütsel güven ve sinizm algılarının örgütsel bağlılıkları üzerindeki rolü. [The role of employees’ organizational trust and cynicism perceptions on organizational commitment]. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 20 (2), 285-302. [Google Scholar]
  96. Uysal, H. T., & Yıldız, M. S. (2014). İşgören performansı açısından çalışma psikolojisinin örgütsel sinizme etkisi [Effect of work psychology on the organizational cynicism for employee performance]. The Journal of International Social Research, 7 (29), 835-849. [Google Scholar]
  97. Uzun, T., & Ayık, A. (2016). Okul müdürlerinin iletişim becerileri ile öğretmenlerin genel ve örgütsel sinizm tutumları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. [The relationship between school principals’ communication skills and teachers’ general and organizational cynicism attitudes]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12 (2), 672-688. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17860/efd.87017 [Google Scholar]
  98. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: Industrial Relation Center, University of Minnesota. [Google Scholar]
  99. Yılmaz, A., & Boğa-Ceylan, Ç. (2011). İlköğretim okul yöneticilerinin liderlik davranış düzeyleri ile öğretmenlerin iş doyumu ilişkisi. [Relationship between primary school administrators’ leadership behavior and job satisfaction of teachers]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17 (2), 277-294. [Google Scholar]
  100. Yüksel-Şahin, F., & Sarıdemir, T. (2017). Okul müdürlerinin liderlik stillerine göre öğretmenlerin yaşam doyumlarının ve evlilik doyumlarının incelenmesi. [An examination of teachers' life satisfaction and marriage satisfaction according to the leadership styles of school principals]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37 (1), 391-425. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 15 Issue 1

February 2019

All Articles

International Journal of Progressive Education

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.