International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2020, Vol. 16(1) 111-124

Increasing Self-Evaluation Use Through Video Feedback to Improve Academic Engagement Among Students with Intellectual Disabilities

Çığıl Aykut

pp. 111 - 124   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1910-23-0002.R1

Published online: February 09, 2020  |   Number of Views: 108  |  Number of Download: 688


Self-evaluation is a skill that can help individuals to increase their own performance on completing tasks in engagements. The literature provides several examples of using self-evaluation with different participant groups with psychological and behavioral problems. There are a limited number of examples of using self-evaluation with individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDs), which demonstrated effective use of self-evaluation combined with other techniques such as video feedback. The present study focused on examining the effectiveness of using video feedback to increase the use of self-evaluation of students with IDs who are trying to improve their academic engagement. The study applied a multiple probe design to track changes in the behaviors with three students with IDs. The study provided evidence that the students were able to improve their academic engagement in regard to increase on-task behaviors, raising hands, and complieance while increasing self-evaluation.   

Keywords: Self-evaluation, video feedback, intellectual disability, behavior change

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Aykut, C. (2020). Increasing Self-Evaluation Use Through Video Feedback to Improve Academic Engagement Among Students with Intellectual Disabilities . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 111-124. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.9

Aykut, C. (2020). Increasing Self-Evaluation Use Through Video Feedback to Improve Academic Engagement Among Students with Intellectual Disabilities . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), pp. 111-124.

Chicago 16th edition
Aykut, Cigil (2020). "Increasing Self-Evaluation Use Through Video Feedback to Improve Academic Engagement Among Students with Intellectual Disabilities ". International Journal of Progressive Education 16 (1):111-124. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.9.

  1. Airasian, P. W., & Gullickson, A. R. (1997). Teacher Self-Evaluation Tool Kit. Corwin Press, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.  [Google Scholar]
  2. Agran, M. (Ed.). (1997). Student-directed learning: Teaching self-determination skills. Wadsworth Publishing Company. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alberto, P., Cihak, D. F., & Gama, R. I. (2005). Use of static picture prompts versus video modeling during simulation instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 327339. [Google Scholar]
  4. Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., & Furlong, M.J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369-386. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ardoin, S. P., & Martens, B. K. (2004). Training children to make accurate self-evaluations: Effects on behavior and the quality of self-ratings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13(1), 1-23. [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgio, K. L., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1981). The effects of social anxiety and videotape performance feedback on cognitions and self-evaluations. Behavioral Counseling Quarterly. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cihak, D. F., Kessler, K., & Alberto, P. (2007). Generalized use of a handheld prompting system. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 397-408. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chung, K., Reavis, S., Mosconi, M., Drewry, J., Matthews, T., & Tasse, M. (2007). Peer-mediated social skills training program for young children with high functioning autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 423-436. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cunningham, C., & Glenn, S. (2004). Self‐awareness in young adults with Down syndrome: I. Awareness of Down syndrome and disability. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51(4), 335-361. [Google Scholar]
  10. Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2000). Effectiveness of video feedback and self-management on inappropriate social behavior of youth with mild mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 409-423. [Google Scholar]
  11. Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2002). Effects of video feedback on social behavior of youth with mild mental retardation and staff responses. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49, 105-116. [Google Scholar]
  12. Emerson, E. (2003). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(1), 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fukkink, R. G., Trienekens, N., & Kramer, L. J. (2011). Video feedback in education and training: Putting learning in the picture. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 45-63. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 251–296). New York, NY: Routledge.  [Google Scholar]
  15. Glenn, S., & Cunningham, C. (2001). Evaluation of Self by Young People with Down Syndrome. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 48(2), 163–177.  [Google Scholar]
  16. Griffiths, R. D., & Gillingham, P. (1978). The influence of videotape feedback on the self-assessments of psychiatric patients. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 133(2), 156-161.  [Google Scholar]
  17. Grossi, T. A., & Heward, W. L. (1998). Using self-evaluation to improve the work productivity of trainees in a community-based restaurant training program. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 248-263. [Google Scholar]
  18. Harchik, A. E., Sherman, J. A., & Sheldon, J. B. (1992). The use of self-management procedures by people with developmental disabilities: A brief review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 211–227. [Google Scholar]
  19. Harvey, S. T., Boer, D., Meyer, L. H., & Evans, I. M. (2009). Updating a meta-analysis of intervention research with challenging behaviour: Treatment validity and standards of practice. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34(1), 67-80. [Google Scholar]
  20. Harvey, A. G., Clark, D. M., Ehlers, A., & Rapee, R. M. (2000). Social anxiety and self-impression: cognitive preparation enhances the beneficial effects of video feedback following a stressful social task. Behaviour research and therapy, 38(12), 1183-1192. [Google Scholar]
  21. Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., Van Den Noortgate, W., Kuppens, S., & Onghena, P. (2012). A multilevel meta-analysis of single-case and small-n research on interventions for reducing challenging behavior in persons with intellectual disabilities. Research in developmental disabilities, 33(2), 766-780.  [Google Scholar]
  22. Kern-Dunlap, L., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., Childs, K., White, R., & Stewart, M. (1992). Effects of a videotape feedback package on the peer interactions of children with serious behavioral and emotional challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 355-364. [Google Scholar]
  23. Maione, L. M., & Mirenda, P. (2006). Effects of video modelling and video feedback on peer-directed social language of a child with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 106-118. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mechling, L. C., & Gast, D. L. (2003). Multi-media instruction to teach grocery word associations and store location: A study of generalization. Education and Training in Mentally Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 38, 62-76. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Barthold, S. (2003). Multi-media computer-based instruction to teach students with moderate intellectual disabilities to use a debit card to make purchases. Exceptionality, 11, 239-254.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Murphy, G. H., Beadle-Brown, J., Wing, L., Gould, J., Shah, A., & Holmes, N. (2005). Chronicity of Challenging Behaviours in People with Severe Intellectual Disabilities and/or Autism: A Total Population Sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(4), 405–418.  [Google Scholar]
  27. O’Reilly, M. F., O’Halloran, M., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., Green, V., & Edrisinha, C., et al. (2005). Evaluation of video feedback and self-management to decrease schoolyard aggression and increase pro-social behavior in two students with behavioural disorders. Educational Psychology, 25, 199-206. [Google Scholar]
  28. Parr, C. J., & Cartwright‐Hatton, S. (2009). Social anxiety in adolescents: the effect of video feedback on anxiety and the self‐evaluation of performance. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 16(1), 46-54. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pennington, R.C., & Courtade, G.R. (2015). An examination of teacher and student behaviors in classrooms for students with moderate and severe intellectual disability. Preventing School Failure, 59(1), 40-47.  [Google Scholar]
  30. Rapee, R. M., & Hayman, K. (1996). The effects of video feedback on the self-evaluation of performance in socially anxious subjects. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(4), 315-322. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rotgans, J.I., & Schmidt, H.G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21, 58–67. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sainato, D. M., Strain, P. S., Lefebvre, D., & Rapp, N. (1990). Effects of self-evaluation on the independent work skills of preschool children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 56(6), 540-549. [Google Scholar]
  33. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and selfevaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172. [Google Scholar]
  34. Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 71-86. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shelton T. L., Barkley R. A., Crosswait C., Moorehouse M., Fletcher K., Barrett S., Jenkins L. & Metevia L. (1998) Psychiatric and  psychological Morbidity as a function of adaptive disability in preschool children with aggressive and hyperactive–impulsive–inattentive behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 475-494. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sturmey, P. (2004). Cognitive therapy with people with intellectual disabilities: A selective review and critique. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 11(4), 222-232. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Exploring the Relationship Between Increased Opportunities to Respond to Academic Requests and the Academic and Behavioral Outcomes of Students with EBD A Review. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 113-121. [Google Scholar]
  38. Taber-Doughty, T., Patton, S. E., & Brennan, S. (2008). Simultaneous and delayed video modeling: An examination of system effectiveness and student preferences. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(1), 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  39. Thiemann, K. S., & Goldstein, H. (2001). Social stories, written text cues, and video feedback: Effects on social communication of children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 425-446. [Google Scholar]