International Journal of Progressive Education
ISSN (Print): 2834-7919 - ISSN (Online): 1554-5210

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Progressive Education 2020, Vol. 16(3) 53-66

Gender Gap and Career Choices in STEM Education:  Turkey Sample

Ayse Ciftci, Mustafa Sami Topcu & Ibrahim Erdogan

pp. 53 - 66   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.248.4

Publish Date: June 05, 2020  |   Number of Views: 891  |  Number of Download: 1566

PDF Download

Abstract

This study aims to explore middle school students' attitudes towards STEM fields and their interest in STEM careers in terms of gender. Furthermore, this study examines the relationship between middle school students’ attitudes towards STEM fields and their interest in STEM careers. Seven hundred and seventy four students from 10 cities located in 6 geographical regions of Turkey completed the STEM Attitude Scale and STEM Career Interest Survey. It was determined that middle school students’ attitudes towards STEM were not statistically significant in terms of gender. In addition, it was found that students’ interest in STEM careers differed in terms of gender. When the scores of attitudes towards engineering and technology fields and the interest in careers in these fields were compared in terms of gender, significant difference in favor of male students was found. Furthermore, a positive correlation between the middle school students' attitudes towards STEM fields and their interest towards STEM careers was determined. Results indicate that approximately 43% of the total variance of interest towards STEM careers stems from attitudes towards STEM fields. The results obtained from this study will give an insight into how to shape the aims and applications of the future STEM education programs.

Keywords: STEM Attitude, STEM Career Interest, Gender, Middle School Students

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Ciftci, A., Topcu, M.S., & Erdogan, I. (2020). Gender Gap and Career Choices in STEM Education:  Turkey Sample. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(3), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.248.4

Harvard
Ciftci, A., Topcu, M. and Erdogan, I. (2020). Gender Gap and Career Choices in STEM Education:  Turkey Sample. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(3), pp. 53-66.

Chicago 16th edition
Ciftci, Ayse, Mustafa Sami Topcu and Ibrahim Erdogan (2020). "Gender Gap and Career Choices in STEM Education:  Turkey Sample". International Journal of Progressive Education 16 (3):53-66. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.248.4

References
  1. Allan, E. J., & Madden, M. (2003). Chilly classrooms for female undergraduate students at a research university: a question of method? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, April 21 – 25. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aydın, G., Saka, M., & Guzey, S. (2017). 4-8. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik (STEM=FETEMM) tutumlarının incelenmesi (Science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) attitude levels in grades 4th - 8th). Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2), 787-802. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  4. Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. (2011). Women in STEM: a gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief, 04-11. [Google Scholar]
  5. Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2018). The effect of authentic project‐based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1-21. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bokova, I. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0025/002534/253479e.pdf. Accessed 04 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: challenges and opportunities. Arlington: National Science Teachers Association. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., Milner-Bolotin, M., & Lissitsa, S. (2016). Examination of factors predicting secondary students’ interest in tertiary STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 366-390. [Google Scholar]
  9. Christidou, V. (2006). Greek students’ science-related interests and experiences: gender differences and correlations. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1181-1199. [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, B., & Button, C. (2011). Sustainability transdisciplinary education model: interface of arts, science, and community (STEM). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 41‐54. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cooper, R., & Heaverlo, C. (2013). Problem solving and creativity and design: what influence do they have on girls' interest in STEM subject areas?. American Journal of Engineering Education, 4(1), 27-38. [Google Scholar]
  12. Craig, C., Verma, R., Stokes, D., Evans, P., & Abrol, B. (2018). The influence of parents on undergraduate and graduate students’ entering the STEM disciplines and STEM careers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 621-643. [Google Scholar]
  13. Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2007). Essential social psychology. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21-29. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dika, S. L., & D'Amico, M. M. (2016). Early experiences and integration in the persistence of first‐generation college students in STEM and non‐STEM majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 368-383. [Google Scholar]
  16. Faber, M., Unfried, A., Wiebe, E. N., Corn, J. Townsend, L.W. & Collins, T. L. (2013). Student attitudes toward STEM: the development of upper elementary school and middle/high school student surveys. 120th ASSE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fox, M. F., Sonnert, G., & Nikiforova, I. (2011). Programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering: Issues, problems, and solutions. Gender & Society, 25, 589–615. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate in education. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  19. Friday Institute for Educational Innovation (2012). Student attitudes toward STEM survey-upper elementary school students. Raleigh, NC: Author. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fried, T., & MacCleave, A. (2009). Influence of role models and mentors on female graduate students' choice of science as a career. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 55(4), 482. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012, August). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. [Google Scholar]
  22. Greenfield, S., Peters, J., Lane, N., Rees, T. & Samuels, G. (2002). A report on women in science, engineering and technology for the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/nrc/section_2/publications/reports/R1182_SET_Fair_Report.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). Using Gottfredson's theory of circumscription and compromise in career guidance and counseling. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 71-100). New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gülhan, F., & Sahin, F. (2016). The effects of science-technology-engineering-math (STEM) integration on 5th grade students’ perceptions and attitudes towards these areas. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 602-620.  [Google Scholar]
  25. Harackiewicz, J. M., & Hulleman, C. S. (2010). The importance of interest: the role of achievement goals and task values in promoting the development of interest. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 42-52. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ivie, R., & Tesfaye, C. L. (2012). Women in physics: a tale of limits. Physics Today, 65(2), 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kalan, Ö. G. (2010). Reklamda çocuğun toplumsal cinsiyet teorisi bağlamında konumlandırılışı:'kinder'reklam filmleri üzerine bir inceleme (Positioning of children on commercials according to gender theory: an analysis about ‘kinder’ television commercials). İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi| Istanbul University Faculty of Communication Journal, 1(38), 75-89. [Google Scholar]
  28. Karakaya, F., & Avgın, S. S. (2016, June). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin STEM'e (S-STEM) karşı tutumlarının belirlenmesi (Determination of attitudes of secondary school students towards STEAM (S-STEM)). Paper presented at III. International Eurasian Educational Research Congress, 1-3 June, Muğla, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W., & Albert, J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461-481. [Google Scholar]
  31. Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2011). Contrasting perceptions of STEM content and careers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 92-117. [Google Scholar]
  32. Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593-641. [Google Scholar]
  33. Korkut-Owen, F., & Mutlu, T. (2016). Türkiye'de fen bilimleri, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik alanlarının seçiminde cinsiyetler arası farklılıklar (Gender differences on selecting STEM areas in Turkey). Education for Life, 30(2), 53-72. [Google Scholar]
  34. Koyunlu Unlu, Z., Dokme, I., & Unlu, V. (2016). Adaptation of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics career interest survey (STEM-CIS) into Turkish. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 63, 21-36, DOI:10.14689/ejer.2016.63.2 [Google Scholar]
  35. Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. ESA Issue Brief, 03-11. US Department of Commerce. [Google Scholar]
  36. LeGrand, J. (2013). Exploring gender differences across elementary, middle, and high school students’ science and math attitudes and interest (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMINo. 3556932). [Google Scholar]
  37. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.  DOI:10.1006/jvbe. 1994.1027  [Google Scholar]
  38. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: a social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36-49.  [Google Scholar]
  39. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, H. B., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B. R., Gloster, C. S., ... & Treistman, D. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for women and students at historically black universities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 84-92. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mahoney, M. P. (2009). Student attitude toward STEM: Development of an instrument for high school STEM-based programs. (Unpublished PhD thesis). The Ohio State University, USA. [Google Scholar]
  41. Maltese, A. V. & Tai, R. H.  (2010). Eyeballs in the Fridge: sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669-685, DOI: 10.1080/09500690902792385 [Google Scholar]
  42. National Research Council (NRC)‐U.S. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Schools or Programs for K‐12 STEM Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  43. National Science Board (US). (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the US science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  44. National Science Board. (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 14-01).  [Google Scholar]
  45. OECD. (2006). Women in scientificcareers: Unleashing the Potential. OECD. http:// www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/womeninscientificcareersunleashingthepotential.htm. Accessed 06 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
  46. Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1048-1073. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: a gender study. Science education, 96(3), 411-427. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sarıkaya, T. & Khorshid, L. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimini etkileyen etmenlerin incelenmesi: Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi (Investigation of the effects that affect the vocational selection of university students: vocational selection of university students). The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 7(2), 393-423.  [Google Scholar]
  49. Scott, A. B., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2005). Parental emotional support, science self-efficacy, and choice of science major in undergraduate women. Career Development Quarterly, 53(3), 263-273. [Google Scholar]
  50. Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66(3-4), 175-183. [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith, E. (2011). Women into science and engineering? Gendered participation in higher education STEM subjects. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 993–1014. doi:10.1080/01411926. 2010.515019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  52. Soylu, R. A. Ş. (2016). STEM educatıon in early childhood in Turkey. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, Special Issue, 6(1), 38-47. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tai, R. H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143-1144. DOI: 10.1126/science.1128690  [Google Scholar]
  54. Tang, M., Pan, W. & Newmeyer, M. D. (2008). Factors influencing high school students' career aspirations. Professional School Counseling, 11(5), 285-295.  [Google Scholar]
  55. Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87-102. [Google Scholar]
  56. Turkish Industry and Business Association, (2014). STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Fen, Teknoloji, Mühendislik, Matematik) alanında eğitim almış işgücüne yönelik talep ve beklentiler araştırması (Demand and expectations research for labor force trained in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics). https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/8054-stem-alaninda-egitim-almis-isgucune-yonelik-talep-ve-beklentiler-arastirmasi. Accessed 10 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
  57. Unfried, A., Faber, M., & Wiebe, E. (2014). Gender and student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University 2014, http://miso.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/AERA2014-paper-Student-Attitudes-Toward-STEM.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ünlü, K. Z. & Dökme, İ. (2018). Multivariate assessment of middle school students' interest in STEM career: a profile from Turkey. Research in Science Education, 1-15, DOI: 10.1007/s11165-018-9729-4. [Google Scholar]
  59. Vulperhorst, J. P., Wessels, K. R., Bakker, A., & Akkerman, S. F. (2018). How do STEM-interested students pursue multiple interests in their higher educational choice?. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 828-846. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., & Topcu, M. S. (2008). Relationships among preservice science teachers’ epistemological beliefs, epistemological worldviews, and self ‐ efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (1), 65-85. [Google Scholar]
  61. Watermeyer, R., Morton, P., & Collins, J. (2016). Rationalising for and against a policy of school-led careers guidance in STEM in the UK: a teacher perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1441-1458. [Google Scholar]
  62. Weinburgh, M. H. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970-1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387-398. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wellcome Trust Monitor (2013). https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/monitor-wave2-full-wellcome-may13.pdf. Accessed 06 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wiebe, E., Unfried, A., & Faber, M. (2018). The relationship of STEM attitudes and career interest. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), 1-17. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wyss, V. L.,Heulskamp, D., &Siebert, C. J. (2012). Increasing middle school student interest in STEM careers with videos of scientists. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(4), 501-522. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 16 (3)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 16 Issue 3

June 2020

All Manuscript

International Journal of Progressive Education

Copyright © 2025 International Journal of Progressive Education.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website were created using the BOQ™ - Intelligent Webverse System.