International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2016, Vol. 12(1) 90-98

Improving University Students’ Science-Technology-Society-Environment Competencies

Yalçın Yalaki

pp. 90 - 98   |  Manu. Number: ijpe.2016.020

Published online: February 01, 2016  |   Number of Views: 297  |  Number of Download: 812


Science, Technology, Society, Environment (STSE) is an education movement that started and developed from 70s through early 2000s. Although this movement had lost emphasis in recent years, it is one of the most important educational reform attempts in science education history. Today, concepts like Socio Scientific Issues (SSI) or Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) education are more prevalent. STSE reform aims making science more relevant for students while helping them attain scientific literacy. If applied well, this approach is very powerful in achieving this aim. This study explores the effect of an elective course on students’ competencies in STSE education. Turned in assignments and presentations of 22 participants were the source of data, which was analyzed through content analysis. Results show that students were able to achieve high competency in certain areas of STSE education, while having difficulties in others. This study may have implications for university level STSE courses.

Keywords: Science-technology-society-environment competencies, scientific literacy, teacher competences

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Yalaki, Y. (2016). Improving University Students’ Science-Technology-Society-Environment Competencies. International Journal of Progressive Education, 12(1), 90-98.

Yalaki, Y. (2016). Improving University Students’ Science-Technology-Society-Environment Competencies. International Journal of Progressive Education, 12(1), pp. 90-98.

Chicago 16th edition
Yalaki, Yalcin (2016). "Improving University Students’ Science-Technology-Society-Environment Competencies". International Journal of Progressive Education 12 (1):90-98.

  1. Abualrob, M. M., & Shah, M. (2012). Science Technology and Society Modules Development Process and Testing on its Effectiveness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 811-816. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aikenhead, G. (2003). STS Education: A Rose by Any Other Name. In R. Cross (Ed.), A Vision for Science Education: Responding to the Work of Peter J. Fensham, (pp. 59-75). New York: RoutledgeFarmer. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akcay, B. & Akcay H. (2015). Effectiveness of science-technology-society (STS) instruction on student understanding of the nature of science and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(1), 37-45. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bettencourt, C.; Velho, J.; Almeida, P. (2011). “Biology teachers’ perceptions about ScienceTechnology.Society (STS) education”. In. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15: 3148-3152. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheek, D. W. (1992). Thinking constructively about science, technology and society education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dass, P. M. (1999). An STS approach to organizing a secondary science methods course: Preliminary findings. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual International Coriference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (pp. 331 - 338). Greenville, NC: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 431 626) [Google Scholar]
  7. Elmas, R., Öztürk, N., Irmak, M., & Cobern, W. W. (2014). An Investigation of Teacher Response to National Science Curriculum Reforms in Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  8. European Commission. (1995). White paper on education and training: Teaching and learning—Towards the learning society (White paper). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications in European Countries. [Google Scholar]
  9. Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T., Mitcham, C., & Tuana, N. (2007). Interdisciplinary studies in science, technology, and society:“New Directions: Science, Humanities, Policy”. Technology in Society, 29(2), 145-152. [Google Scholar]
  10. King, K. P. (2002). Examination of the science-technology-society approach to the curriculum (retrieved September 15, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. Lawrence, C., Yager, R., Sowell, S., Hancock, E., Yalaki, Y., & Jablon, P. (2001). The Philosophy, Theory and Practice of Science-Technology-Society Orientations. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mansour, N. (2010). Science teachers’ perspectives on science-technology-society (STS) in science education. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 2(2), 123-157. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mansour N (2009) Science-technology-society (STS): a new paradigm in science education. Bull Sci Technol Soc 29:287–297 [Google Scholar]
  14. M.E.B. (2005). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programı. Ankara/Turkey: MEB [Google Scholar]
  15. M.E.B. (2013). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı. Ankara/Turkey: MEB [Google Scholar]
  16. OECD. (2013). Draft PISA 2015 Science Framework. Paris: OECD. (retrieved August 1, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. Pedretti, E., & Nazir, J. (2011). Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, 40 years on. Science Education, 95(4), 601-626. doi:10.1002/sce.20435 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. Pedretti, E. G., Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Romkey, L. & Jivraj, A. (2008). Promoting issues-based STSE perspectives in science teacher education: Problems of identity and ideology. Science & Education, 17(8–9), 941–960. [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith, M. K. (2007) ‘Action research’, the encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved from (retrieved on April 01, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  20. Solomon J. & Aikenhead G. (ed.) (1994). STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform. Teachers College Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  21. Steele, A. (2013). Shifting Currents: Science Technology Society and Environment in Northern Ontario Schools. Brock Education Journal, 23(1). [Google Scholar]
  22. United Nations Environment Programme. (2012). 21 Issues for the 21st Century: Result of the UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental Issues. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Nairobi, Kenya. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yalaki, Y. (2014). Türkiye’de fen, teknoloji, toplum, çevre (FTTÇ) eğitimi ne durumda? Cito Eğitim: Kuram ve Uygulama, 26, 27-36. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yager, R. E. (1996). History of science/tehcnology/society as reform in the United States. R. E. Yager (Ed.), Science/tehcnology/society as reform in science education (s. 3 -15), Albany: Suny. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yager, R. E. (2007). STS requires changes in teaching. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 27(5), 386–390. [Google Scholar]