International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2021, Vol. 17(3) 250-262

Social Innovation And Lateral Thinking Tendencies Of Preservice Social Studies Teachers

Arcan Aydemir

pp. 250 - 262   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.16   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2010-26-0001.R3

Published online: June 07, 2021  |   Number of Views: 13  |  Number of Download: 86


Abstract

Changes in various areas of life have increased the need for individuals who can think differently and are open to innovation. Education and training activities are important in meeting this need. This study aimed to investigate the social innovation and lateral thinking tendencies of preservice social studies teachers, who will be among the important components of educational activities in the future, in relation to various variables (gender, year of study, grand point average, and level of openness to innovation). The study used a survey research design. The working group consisted of 272 preservice social studies teachers from two different universities who volunteered to participate in the study. The data were collected using the “Social Innovation Scale” and the “Lateral Thinking Disposition Scale”. As a result of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test conducted to check the normality of the data, the data were found to be not normally distributed. Thus, the data were analysed using the nonparametric measures including Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The analysis results showed that the preservice social studies teachers’ social innovation and lateral thinking tendencies did not significantly differ according to their gender and grade point average (GPA). In contrast, their social innovation tendencies differed statistically significantly according to the year of study, while both social innovation and lateral thinking tendencies differed statistically significantly according to their level of openness to innovation. The analysis results also showed a positive significant correlation between social innovation and lateral thinking, where lateral thinking is a predictor of social Innovation. Accordingly, to promote individuals’ social innovation tendencies, the relationship between different thinking and social innovation can be explored and strategies focused on thinking skills can be developed.

Keywords: Innovation, Social Innovation, Thinking, Lateral Thinking, Social Studies


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Aydemir, A. (2021). Social Innovation And Lateral Thinking Tendencies Of Preservice Social Studies Teachers . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(3), 250-262. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.16

Harvard
Aydemir, A. (2021). Social Innovation And Lateral Thinking Tendencies Of Preservice Social Studies Teachers . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(3), pp. 250-262.

Chicago 16th edition
Aydemir, Arcan (2021). "Social Innovation And Lateral Thinking Tendencies Of Preservice Social Studies Teachers ". International Journal of Progressive Education 17 (3):250-262. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.16.

References
  1. Arsad, N., Sanusi, H., Majid, R. A., Ali, M. M., & Husain, H. (2012). Lateral thinking through black box experiment among engineering students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Beyaz, M., Keten, S. A., Caba, U. & Pekel, A. (2020). The relationship between student's lateral thinking and conscious awareness level. The Journal of Academic Social Sciences, 8(102), 248-253.http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.40265 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bodur, G. (2018). The relationship between individual innovativeness and entrepreneurship tendency of nursing students. Journal of Health Sciences and Professions, 5(2), 139-148. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cajaiba Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 82, 42-51. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chatsuwan, P., Koraneekij, P., & Na-Songkhla, J. (2020). Development of instructional model using problem-based learning with lateral thinking on isometric virtual world to enhance creative problem-solving of the undergraduate students. Journal of Information Science, 38(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.14456/jiskku.2020.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Çağlıyan, V., Esenalieva, E., & Attar, M. (2019). A research on the relationship between individual and social innovativeness: the case of Selcuk university. Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, 14(52), 433-455. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.595050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. De Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking. London: Ward Lock Education. [Google Scholar]
  8. Deveci, İ & Kavak, S. (2020). Innovativeness perceptions and innovative thinking tendencies of middle school students: an exploratory sequential design. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 346-378. DOI: 10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.15m [Google Scholar]
  9. Durmuş İskender, M., Kaş Güner, C., & Oluk, A. (2018). Determining of the relationship between critical thinking dispositions and individual innovativeness of nursing students. The Journal of International Social Research, 11(56), 489-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20185639022 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eren, H. (2010). Proposal of a model that is measuring the effect of the university students’ social innovative capacity on their technological innovativeness. (Doctoral Dissertation). Turkish Military Academy Defense Science Institute Department Of Technology Management, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  11. Esenalieva, E. (2019). A research on the relationship between corporate entrepreneurship, individual and social innovativeness: A comparison between Turkey and Kyrgyzstan. (Master’s Thesis). Selçuk University Institute of Social Sciences, Konya. [Google Scholar]
  12. Esen, D., Esen, M., & Kaya Özdağ, G. (2020). The effect of sustainability perceptions of academicans on social innovation behavior intermediate role of individual creativity. International Journal of Management and Administration, 4(7), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.29064/ijma.660939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Gökalp, M. (2019). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri (4.baskı) [Teaching principles and methods (4th Edition)]. Ankara: Pegem. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hernandez, J. S. & Varkey, P. (2008). Vertical versus lateral thinking. The Physician Executive, 34, 26-28. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hillgren, P.A., Seravalli, A., & Emilson, A. (2011). Prototyping and infrastructuring in design for social innovation. CoDesign, 7(3-4), 169-183. DOI:10.1080/15710882.2011.630474 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hocaoğlu, H. & Akkaş Baysal, E. (2019). Nicel araştırma modelleri desenleri [Quantitative research models patterns]. In G. Ocak (Ed.). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods in education]  (pp.67-123). Ankara: Pegem. [Google Scholar]
  17. Karagöz, B. (2019). An evaluation of pre-service Turkish teachers’ lateral thinking dispositions with regard to different variables.  European Journal of Education Studies, 5(9), 156-165. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2542955 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kılıç, H. (2015). Primary subject teachers’ individual innovativeness levels and lifelong learning tendencies (within Denizli province). (Master’s Thesis). Pamukkale University Institute of Educational Sciences, Denizli. [Google Scholar]
  19. Krlev, G., Bund, E., & Mildenberger, G. (2014). Measuring what matters—indicators of social innovativeness on the national level. Information Systems Management, 31(3), 200-224, DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2014.923265. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lawrence, A.S.A. & Xavier, S.A. (2013). Lateral thinking of prospective teachers. Journal of Educational Reflection, 1(1), 28-32. [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin, B. (2006). Social testing. Social Alternatives, 25(4), 39-42. [Google Scholar]
  22. MoNE (Ministry of National Education). (2018). Social studies curriculum (primary and secondary schools 4, 5, 6 and 7 grades). Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1, 145-162. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Murray, R., Caulier Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: The Young Foundation & NESTA. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mustofa, R. F. & Hidayah, Y. R. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning on lateral thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 463-474. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13130a [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Özgür, H. (2013). Exploring of the relationship between critical thinking tendencies and individual innovativeness of CEIT department pre-service teachers. Mersin University Journal of The Faculty of Education, 9(2), 409-420. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pandya, S.P. (2020). Meditation to improve lateral and divergent thinking among older adults: a 2-year follow-up study. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 32, 723–732. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01240-4 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pitt-Catsouphes, M. & Berzin, S. C. (2015) Teaching note-incorporating social innovation content into macro social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(2), 407-416, DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2015.1012947. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pol, E. & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 878-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Seçkin Halaç, D., Eren, H., & Bulut, Ç. (2014). Social innovation: A scale development study.Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 32(1), 165-190. DOI: 10.17065/huiibf.48390 [Google Scholar]
  32. Semerci, Ç. (2016). Developing a lateral thinking disposition (latd) scale: a validity and reliability study. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 12(1), 358-371. [Google Scholar]
  33. Semerci, N. (2017). Pedagogical formation students’ dispositions toward lateral thinking. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(1), 336-345. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.293271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Sevinç, Ş. (2020). A research on the investigatıon of lateral thinking tendencies of universıty students. (Master’s Thesis). Erciyes University Institute of Educational Sciences, Kayseri. [Google Scholar]
  35. Srikongchan, W., Kaewkuekool, S., & Mejaleurn, S. (2021). Backward instructional design based learning activities to developing students’ creative thinking with lateral thinking technique. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.293271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Sütcü, H. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and social innovation:the case of Karaman Social Security Provincial Directorate. (Master’s Thesis). Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Institute of Social Studies, Karaman. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tabachnick B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. (Sixth ed.), Boston: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tantekin Çelik, G., Aydınlı, S., & Bağrıaçık, B. (2018). Experimental study on usage levels of lateral thinking systems in construction engineering students. 13th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, 12-14 September 2018, İzmir. [Google Scholar]
  39. Uslu, D. & Mansur, F. (2017). An investigation on determining the individual-social innovativeness and proactiveness characteristics of healthcare manager candidate’s. Gazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, (Gazi Academic Young Social Scientists Symposium 2017 Special Issue), 52-68. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ünveren Kapanadze, D. (2019). Analyzing learning outcomes of new Turkish teaching curriculum in terms of higher-order thinking skills. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 48(223), 83-112. [Google Scholar]
  41. Waks, S. (1997). Lateral thinking and technology education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(4), 245-255. [Google Scholar]
  42. Van der Have, R. P. & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: an emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Yahyagil, M. Y. (2001). Organizational creativity and innovation. Yönetim, 38, 7-16. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yıldız, K. & Yılmaz B. (2020). The relationship between critical and lateral thinking dispositions of primary school teacher candidates. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 20 (1), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2020.20.52925-578949 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  45. Yılmaz, B. (2017). The relationship between critical and lateral thinking dispositions of classroom teacher candidates. (Master’s Thesis). Abant İzzet Baysal University Institute of Educational Sciences, Bolu.  [Google Scholar]
  46. Yılmaz, K. (2019). Eleştirel ve analitik düşünme (2.baskı)[Critical and analytical thinking (2nd Edition)]. Ankara: Pegem. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yüce, A. & Samsa, Ç. (2017). The effect of social and tecnological innovation tendencies on exploratory buying behavior tendencies: a study on students of Kafkas university. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4), 67-74. [Google Scholar]