International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2021, Vol. 17(4) 49-62

The Effect of Techno-Pedagogically Designed 5E Learning Model on Student Success and Attitude toward Turkish Class

Harun Kadıoğlu & Abdullah Çetin

pp. 49 - 62   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.4   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2011-23-0002.R1

Published online: August 08, 2021  |   Number of Views: 24  |  Number of Download: 97


Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the 5E learning model designed in accordance with a techno pedagogical lesson plan on student success and attitude in a Turkish course. The research is quantitative and uses a quasi-experimental model with pre-test/post-test control groups. The universe of this study consisted of 8th grade students studying in the Onikişubat district of the province of Kahramanmaraş in the 2019-2020 academic year. The sample of the study consisted of 110 students studying in four different classes from within this same population.

The lessons in the experimental group were taught using a 5E learning model designed in accordance with a techno pedagogical lesson plan, while the lessons in the control group were based on the methods described by the Turkish lesson curriculum. In this study, the "Attitude Scale Towards Turkish Lessons” (ASTTL) and "Turkish Course Academic Achievement Test” (TCAAT) were used as data collection tools. In the analysis of the data obtained in the study, the independent sample t-test and the correlated sample t-test were used. As a result of the research, a statistically significant difference was found in favor of the experimental group between the average achievement scores of the students in the experimental group and those of the students in the control group. However, a statistically significant difference was not found between the average attitude scores of the experimental group versus the control group.

Keywords: Techno Pedagogic Lesson Plan, 5E Learning Model, Academic Success, Attitude


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kadioglu, H. & Cetin, A. (2021). The Effect of Techno-Pedagogically Designed 5E Learning Model on Student Success and Attitude toward Turkish Class . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 49-62. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.4

Harvard
Kadioglu, H. and Cetin, A. (2021). The Effect of Techno-Pedagogically Designed 5E Learning Model on Student Success and Attitude toward Turkish Class . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), pp. 49-62.

Chicago 16th edition
Kadioglu, Harun and Abdullah Cetin (2021). "The Effect of Techno-Pedagogically Designed 5E Learning Model on Student Success and Attitude toward Turkish Class ". International Journal of Progressive Education 17 (4):49-62. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.4.

References
  1. Akaydın, B. B. (2016). The effect of animation-supported 5E learning model on 4th grade social studies achievement. Unpublished Master's Thesis,  Kocaeli University Institute of Social Sciences, Kocaeli/Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  2. Argon, T., İsmetoğlu, M. & Çelik Yılmaz, D. (2015). The opinions of branch teachers about Their tecnopedagogıcal education competencies and individual innovativeness levels. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 4(2), 319-333. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aslan, E. & Kuşçu, E. (May, 2018). Reflections of New Technologies on the Teaching of Language Skills. 4th Language, Culture & Literature Symposium. Antalya. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bademci, V. (2011). A study on the kuder-richardson 20, cronbach’s alpha, hoyt’s analysis of variance, generalizability theory and score reliability. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty, (17), 173-193. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayram, B. (2015). The effect of 5E model to achievement, academic motivation and retention in the grammar teaching at primary school 6th grade. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences Turkish Education Department Erzurum/Turkey.  [Google Scholar]
  6. Benzer, A. (2019). Turkish education with instructional technologies in the digital age. İstanbul [Google Scholar]
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Manual of data analysis for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy [Google Scholar]
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2018). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  9. Durukan, E. (2011). The effect of computer assisted grammar teaching at primary school 6th grade on success and attitude. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences, Erzurum/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  10. Erçapan, C. (2018). An assessment the effect of reading and reading comprehension skills on the teaching process. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 13(19), 615-630. [Google Scholar]
  11. ERG (2020). What does PISA say? Retrieved from the Internet on March 20, 2020 from https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/pisa-2018 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ersoy, M., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. & Ceylan, B. (2016). Investigating preservice teachers’ TPACK competencies through the lenses of ıct skills: An experimental study. Education and Science, 41(186), 119-135. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gezer, B. (2020). The effect of digital materials on listening comprehension levels of second grade primary students. Unpublished Master Thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  14. Gül, Ş. (2011). The effect of course software based on 5E model on students? achievements, attitudes and remedy of misconceptions. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences, Erzurum/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  15. Güneş, F. (2013). Grammar teaching through the constructivist approach. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 9(3), 171-187. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gürbüz, M. & Engin A, O. (2019). The effect of dialogue teaching activities on english speaking skills. İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  17. Güven, B. & Karataş, İ. (2005). Design of constructivist learning environment with dynamic geometry software cabri: A model. Elementary-Online, 4(1), 62-72. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. & Odabaşı F, H. (2013). Techno pedagogical education model. I. Kabakçı Yurdakul (Ed.), In instructional technologies and material design based on technopedagogical education, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kara, H. (2018). The effect of 5E model-based interactive notebook on students' achievement about mixture, motivation and attitude. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Hacettepe University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  20. Karasar, N. (2012). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Nobel Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  21. Keskin, M. (2019). Evaluation of integration of technology supported activities according to 5E model into mathematics education. Unpublished PhD Thesis Bursa Uludağ University Institute of Educational Sciences,Bursa/Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kırkkılıç, H. A. & Şahin, A. (2007). The use of educational technology in developing basic language skills. International Asian and North African Studies Congress, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mercan, M., Filiz, A., Göçer, İ. & Özson, N. (2009). Computer-assisted learning and computer-based teaching practices in Turkey and in the world. Şanlıurfa: Akademik Bilişim Publications.  [Google Scholar]
  24. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. [Google Scholar]
  25. MoNE (Ministry of Education). (2006). Primary Turkish lesson (6th, 7th, 8th grades) curriculum, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  26. MoNE (Ministry of Education). (2018). Fatih project area-based teaching process design course. It was taken from http://Oygm.Meb.Gov.Tr/Dosyalar /Stprg/İndex. Php?Dir on January 10, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. MoNE (Ministry of Education). (2019a). Turkish lesson curriculum (primary and secondary school 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades), Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  28. MoNE (Ministry of Education). (2019b). PISA Turkey preliminary report. it was taken from http://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_12/03105347_pısa_2018_turkiye_on_raporu.pdf address. March 02, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  29. MoNE (Ministry of Education). (2019c). A series of training analysis and evaluation reports. It was taken from https://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_06/24094730_2019 _ortaogretim_kurumlarina_iliskin_merkezi_sinav.pdf.on February 01 2020. [Google Scholar]
  30. MoNE (Ministry of Education). (2019d). 2023 vision. It was taken from http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/ on December 09, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ovalı, T. (2011). The effect of computer-aided instruction in the eighth grade elementary Turkish course to the ability of comprehension. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  32. Öner, İ. E. (2015). The effect of animation supported 5E Model application on students' academic achievements and motivation. Unpublished Master's Thesis Fırat University Institute of Educational Sciences, Elâzığ/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  33. Özbal, A. (2017). Use of web2.0 tools in improving writing skills. Published Master Thesis, Akdeniz University Institute of Educational Sciences, Antalya/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  34. Özcan, M, F. (2015). The effectivity of animation-supported 5E model on success, permanence and attitude in teaching 'Indicative and subjunctive moods' subject of 7th grade Turkish course. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences, Erzurum/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  35. Özipek, K. (2019). The effect of padlet application on students academic achievements and their attidudes towords techology and Turkish. Unpublished Master Thesis: Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences, İstanbul/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  36. Özmen, H. (2014). Experimental research method. Mustafa Metin (Ed.), In scientific research methods in education from theory to practice (ss. 71-73). Ankara: Pegem Academy [Google Scholar]
  37. Parlak, B. (2017). Education in digital age: an analysis on opportunities and applications. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 22 (Special Issue on Kayfor 15), 1741-1759. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tayfa, H. (2018). The effects of using interactive board in Turkish lesson on academic success and attitude of secondary school students. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Kütahya Dumlupınar University Institute of Education Departments, Kütahya/Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  39. TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) (2020). Retrieved on 20.05.2020 from http://tpack.org. [Google Scholar]
  40. Urfalı Dadandı, P. (2016). The effects of usi̇ng electroni̇c books on academi̇c achevement, self-effi̇cacy beli̇efs and atti̇tudes towards turki̇sh teachi̇ng. Unpublished Master Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara/Turkey [Google Scholar]
  41. Yaman, H., Demirtaş, T. & İleri Aydemiz, Z. (2013). The digital pedagogic competencies of pre-service Turkish-language teachers. Turkish Studies, 8(8), 1407-1419. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yılmaz, E. ve Sünbül, A, M. (2009). Developing scale of university students entrepreneurship. Selçuk University The Journal of Institue of Social Sciences, (21), 195-203. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yılmaz, M. (2015). Determining among to correlation of 4th grade student’s success in Turkish, Maths, social seciences and science and technology lessons of reading comprehension levels. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (29), 9-14. [Google Scholar]