International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2021, Vol. 17(5) 33-47

A Study of Developing an Organizational Reputation Management Scale for Schools

Sinan Tümtürk & Levent Deniz

pp. 33 - 47   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2107-03-0003

Published online: September 30, 2021  |   Number of Views: 263  |  Number of Download: 496


This study aims to develop a scale to measure the organizational reputation of especially private schools and foreign private schools in today's increasingly competitive environment. The study group of the research consists of 320 individuals who are 9th, 10th, 11th and 12th grade students receiving education in private and foreign private schools and teachers from different branches. In the development phase of the scale, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to ensure validity and reliability. As a result of validity and reliability studies, the Organizational Reputation Management Scale for Schools was obtained. The analysis result has revealed a scale structure that consists of 7 dimensions and 38 items. Accordingly, the dimensions to determine the organizational reputation of private schools are "Social Responsibility, Commitment to School, Relations with Alumni, School Environment, Leadership, School Management, and Financial Performance". It is expected that the scale to be used by researchers and private schools will significant contributions to the literature on organizational reputation management.

Keywords: Reputation Management, Organizational Reputation, Scale Development

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Tumturk, S. & Deniz, L. (2021). A Study of Developing an Organizational Reputation Management Scale for Schools . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(5), 33-47. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.375.3

Tumturk, S. and Deniz, L. (2021). A Study of Developing an Organizational Reputation Management Scale for Schools . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(5), pp. 33-47.

Chicago 16th edition
Tumturk, Sinan and Levent Deniz (2021). "A Study of Developing an Organizational Reputation Management Scale for Schools ". International Journal of Progressive Education 17 (5):33-47. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2021.375.3.

  1. Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, August, 347-56. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aiken, L. (1997). Questionnaires and inventories: Surveying opinions and assessing personality. New York; John Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, E. & Robertson, T.S. (1995). Including multi-line salespeople to adopt house brands. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 16-31. [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnett, M. Jermier, J. & Lafferty, B. (2006). Corporate reputation: the definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26-38. palgrave.crr.1550012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Bernstein, D. (1984). Company image and reality: A critique of corporate communications. Eastbourne: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. PegemA Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  7. Caruana, A. & Chircop, S. (2000). Measuring corporate reputation: A case example. Corporate Reputation   Review, 3(1), 43-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. Continuum, London. [Google Scholar]
  9. Corebrand, (2005). Our services. Retrieved from services.html. Erişim Tarihi: 26.06.2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Çokluk, Ö. S., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: spss ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, G. & Miles, L. (1998). Reputation management: theory versus practice. Corporate Reputation Review, 2(1), 16–27.  [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, G., Chun, R., Silva, R. V. D. & Roper, S. (2001). The personification metaphor as a measurement approach for corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(2), 113-127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Davies, G., Chun, R., Silva, D. R. V. & Roper, S. (2003). Corporate reputation and competitiveness. Wiltshire: The Cromwell Press. 203218112. [Google Scholar]
  14. Doney, P. M. & Cannon, J.P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dowling, G. R. (2001). Creating corporate reputations: Identity, image and performance.Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development theory and applications second edition. SAGE Publications International Educational and Professional Publisher, 5, 60-96. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dülger, G. (2017). Özel okullarda kurumsal itibar algısı: antalya özel envar okulları paydaşları üzerinde bir araştırma. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Isparta. [Google Scholar]
  18. Engel, K.S., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74. [Google Scholar]
  19. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using spss. 3rd Edition, London: Sage Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, MA. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fombrun, C. J. & van Riel, C. B. M. (1997). The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1/2), 6-13.  [Google Scholar]
  23. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A. & Bernett, M. L. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 85-106. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fombrun, C. J. & Foss, C. B. (2001). Developing a reputation quotient. The Gauge, 14(3). [Google Scholar]
  25. Fortune. (2019, 3 Eylül). Available from: mostadmired/2011/index/html. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gotsi, M. & Wilson, A. M. (2001). Corporate reputation: seeking a definition. Corporate Communications, 6(1), 24-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Hasanbegovic, D. (2011). Corporate reputation and the brand architecture: the debate. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 6(2), 37-43.  [Google Scholar]
  28. Helm, S.  (2005). Designing a Formative Measure for Corporate Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 8, 95–109 doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Karakaş, N. N. (2019). Özel ilkokulların kurumsal itibarı konusunda yönetici, öğretmen ve veli görüşleri: Malatya örneklemi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  30. Karaköse, T. (2006). Eğitim örgütlerindeki iç ve dış paydaşların kurumsal itibara ilişkin algılamaları. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elâzığ. [Google Scholar]
  31. Keller, K. L. & Aaker, D. A. (1998). Corporate level marketing: the impact of credibility marketing on brand extensions. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(4), 356–378. [Google Scholar]
  32. Keller, K. L. (2000). Building and managing corporate brand equity. In Larsen, M.H. (Ed.), Expressive organization: linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. I (II). New York: Norton. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kerin, R. A. & Sethuraman, R. (1998). Exploring the brand value-shareholder value nexus for consumer goods companies. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 260- 73. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kline, R. B. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lloyd S. and K. Mortimer. (2006). Corporate reputation: Seeing through the eye of the beholder, AUT University. Retrieved from (Erişim Tarihi; 9 Ağustos 2019). [Google Scholar]
  38. Marconi, J. (2001). Reputation marketing. Building and sustaining your organization’s greatest asset. Black lick OH, USA: McGraw-Hill Companies. [Google Scholar]
  39. Merriam–Webster. Reputation, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.08.2020). [Google Scholar]
  40. Mishina, Y., Block, E. & Mannor, M. (2011). The path dependence of organizational reputation: how social judgment ınfluences assessments of capability and character. Strategic Management Journal, 33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  41. Özpınar, Ş. (2008). Kurumsal itibarın ölçümü: Türkiye'ye yönelik ölçek geliştirme çalışması. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rindova, V., Williamson, I. & Antoaneta, P. (2005). Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48. 10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Rose, C. & Thomsen, S. (2004). The impact of corporate reputation on performance: Some Danish evidence. European Management Journal, 22(2), 201-10. [Google Scholar]
  44. Safón, V. (2009). Measuring the reputation of top US business schools: A MIMIC modelling approach. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(3), 204-228. [Google Scholar]
  45. Seçer, İ. (2015). Spss ve Lısrel ile pratik veri analizi: analiz ve raporlaştırma. Anı yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  46. Schwaiger, M. (2004). Components and parameters of corporate reputation-an empirical study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56, 46-71. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sherman, M. L. (1999). Reputation: Rhetoric versus reality. London: Limited by Director Publication Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sobol, M. Farelly, G. E. & Tapper, J. S. (1992). Shaping the corporate image: an analytic guide for executive decision makers. New York: Quorum Books. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. [Google Scholar]
  50. Van het Hof, S.D. (2012). Models in reputation measurement. Baybars, B. & Samast, O. (1. Baskı) içinde (s. 29-43). New challenges, new opportunities: Interdisciplinary perspectives on reputation management. Reputation Management Institute of Turkey. Pozitif Matbaacılık. Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Riel, C. B. M. (1997). Increasing effectiveness of managing strategic issues affecting a firm’s reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(2), 135-40. [Google Scholar]
  52. Van Riel, C. B. M., Stroeker, N.E. & Maathuis, O.J.M. (1998) Measuring corporate images. [Google Scholar]
  53. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(4), 313–26. [Google Scholar]
  54. Van Riel, C. ve Fombrun, C. (2007). Essentials of corporate communication. Oxon: [Google Scholar]
  55. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  56. Walsh, G. & Wiedmann, K. P. (2004). A conceptualization of corporate reputation in Germany: an evaluation and extension of the RQ. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(4), 304-12. [Google Scholar]
  57. Walsh, G., Beatty, S. E. & Shiu, E. M. K. (2009). The customer-based corporate reputation scale: replication and short form. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 924-30. [Google Scholar]
  58. Waltz, C., Strcikland, O. & Lenz, E. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research. [Google Scholar]
  59. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 176-8. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, Y., Kandampully, H. P. L., & Shi, G. (2006). The role of brand equity and corporate reputation in crm: a chinese study. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(3), 179-197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  61. Worthington, R. & Whittaker, T. (2006). Scale development research. Counseling Psychologist- Couns Psychol. 806-838. 10.1177/0011000006288 127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]