International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(1) 52-64

Identifying the Values to be acquired by the Students in Inclusive Classrooms based on the Views of the Classroom Teachers

Tansel Yazıcıoğlu & Vedat Aktepe

pp. 52 - 64   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.4   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2012-20-0003.R1

Published online: February 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 337  |  Number of Download: 403


Abstract

The general goal of special education and inclusive education is to socialize students. Socialization refers to individuals’ attempts to participate in their immediate environment through the acquisition of certain knowledge, skills, values and behaviors. The basis of socialization in formal education systems is the educational programs and particularly, the educational program of social studies courses. Identfying which of values contained in the educational programs should be taught to students is very significant to reevaluate these values and to allow classroom teachers to develop common values for inclusive classrooms. The study aims at identifying the values to be acquired by students in inclusive clasrooms. The participants of the study are primary school teachers who work at primary schools in Nevşehir province of Turkey. In the study, qualitative method was used, and the data were collected through semi-structured interview questions and analyzed by content analysis technique by using inductive approach. The findings of the research show that the most frequently cited value for the students with no special education is empathy. The findings of the research also show that the participants mostly employ individual study in value education in the context of inclusive education.

Keywords: Human Values Empathy, Individual Study, Inclusive Classes


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Yazicioglu, T. & Aktepe, V. (2022). Identifying the Values to be acquired by the Students in Inclusive Classrooms based on the Views of the Classroom Teachers . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 52-64. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.4

Harvard
Yazicioglu, T. and Aktepe, V. (2022). Identifying the Values to be acquired by the Students in Inclusive Classrooms based on the Views of the Classroom Teachers . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), pp. 52-64.

Chicago 16th edition
Yazicioglu, Tansel and Vedat Aktepe (2022). "Identifying the Values to be acquired by the Students in Inclusive Classrooms based on the Views of the Classroom Teachers ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (1):52-64. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.4.

References
  1. Acarlar, F. (2016). Inclusive model and characteristics of children with special needs. In Preschool Inclusion in the What, When, Where, Why, How, Who?, edited by Sucuoglu, B. and Bakkaloglu H., 21-76. Ankara: Kök Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akalin, S. (2015). Inclusion Class Teachers' Views and Requirements on Classroom Management. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Special Education Journal, 16 (3), 215-234 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aktepe, V. (2019). Character and Value Education. In V. Aktepe & M. Gunduz (Eds.),  Teacher as a role model in character and value education (p.p. 297-324). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aktepe, V., & Gunduz, M. (2019). Special teaching methods. In V. Aktepe & A. Uzunoz (Eds.), Values education (p.p. 71-103). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen, K. E., Cowdery, G. E., Paasche, C. L., Langford, R., Nolan, K., & Cipparrone, B.         (2015). Inclusion in early childhood programs: children with exceptionalities. New Zealand: Nelson College. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aşilioglu, H. (2019). Determination of teachers 'and pre-service teachers' self-confidence in technological pedagogical content knowledge and self-efficacy towards computer use. (Master's Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  7. Atlay, E. (2019). Investigation of level of secure attachment to parents and self-esteem of primary school 4th grade students. (Master's Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bahar, M. (2018). Examining the empathic tendencies of the classes with inclusive students (Master thesis). Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences Üniversitesi, Kırşehir. [Google Scholar]
  9. Block, M. E., & Obrusnikova, I. (2010). What is inclusion? In Martin E. Block (Eds.),  A teacher’s guide to ıncluding students with disabilities in general physical education, (p.p. 15-29). USA, Maryland: Paul H. Brookes Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bulut, H. (2016). The effect of social skills training on the self-esteem levels of primary school 3rd grade students: Kilis example. (Master's Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  11. Calhoon, M. B.,& Fuchs, L. (2003). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remadial & Special Education, 24 (4), 235-245. [Google Scholar]
  12. Campbell, J., Gilmore, L., & Cuskell, M. (2003). Changing student teachers’ attitudes towards Disability and inclusion. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 28(4): 369-379. doi:10.1080/13668250310001616407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Dokmen, Ü. (2005). Communication conflicts and empathy in art and daily life. Sistem Publishing, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  14. Esmer, B., Yılmaz, E., Guneş, A.M., Tarım, K., & Delican, B. (2017). Classroom teachers' experiences related to the education of inclusive students. The Journal Kastamonu Education, 25 (4): 1601-1618. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferguson, D. L. (1996). İs it inclusion yet? Bursting th ebubbles. In Creating tomorrow's schools today: Stories of inclusion, change and renewal, edited by M. S. Berres, D. L. Ferguson, P. Knoblock, and C. Woods, 16- 37. New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fiscus, D. E., & Mandell, J. C. (2002). Bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim programlarının geliştirilmesi (G. Akçamete, H. G. Şenel ve E. Tekin, Translation.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. (Publication date of the original book 1983) [Google Scholar]
  17. Frankel, E. B. (2004). Supporting inclusive care and education for young children with special needs and their families an international perspective. Childhood Education, 80(6): 310-316. doi:10.1080/00094056.2004.10521277 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. Gresham, F. M. (1986). Conceptional and definitional issues in the assessment of children’s social skills: Implications for classifications and training. Journal of Clinical Child Pyschology,15(1): 3-15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guralnick, M. (1990). Social competence and early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 3-14. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gurgor, M. (2019). The role of the series resurrection Ertugrul in gaining the value of justice in the social studies curriculum. (Master's Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hayward, A. (2006). Making Inclusion Happen: A Practical Guide. Paul Chapman Publishing: London [Google Scholar]
  22. Kabasakal, Z., Girli, A., Okun, B., Celik, N., & Vardarli, G. ( 2008). Inclusive students, peer relationships and peer abuse. The Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Buca Education Faculty, 23, 169-176 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kalambouka, A., Farrell, P., Dyson, A., & Kaplan, I. (2005). The impact of population inclusivity in schools on student outcomes. In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. [Google Scholar]
  24. Karaca, M.A. (2018). The effect of inclusive education program on teachers' professional competencies in mainstreaming practices. (Master Thesis), Necmettin Erbakan University Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kiliç, A. (2019). Primary school fourth grade students' perceptions of love value. (Master's Thesis) Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Institute of Social Sciences, Rize. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kozleski, E., Artiles, A. J. B., & Waitoller. F. R.  (2011). Introduction: equity in inclusive education: historical trajectories and theoretical commitments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Loreman, T., Deppeler, J., & Harvey, D. (2011). Inclusive education: supporting diversity in the classroom. CrowsNest, Australia: Allen&Unwin. [Google Scholar]
  28. Madden, N., & Slavin, R. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53, 519-659. [Google Scholar]
  29. Martin, J. E., Van Dycke, J. L., Christensen, W. R., Greene, B. A., Gardner, J. E., & Lovett, D. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72(3): 299-316. doi:10.1177/001440290607200303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Metin, N. (2012). Integration of children with special needs N. Text (Ed.) In Special Needs Children, Ankara: Maya Academy Publishing [Google Scholar]
  31. Metin, N. (2018). Teacher in preschool inclusive class. Early Childhood Studies Journal, 5th International Preschool Education Congress Special Issue, 2, 2,428-439. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ministry of National Education. (2005). Primary school social studies course (grades 4 and 5) Curriculum and Guide. State Books Directorate: Ankara [Google Scholar]
  33. Ministry of National Education. (2015a). Ministry of National Education Board of Education and Discipline, Life Science Lesson (1, 2 and 3. classes) Curriculum. Ankara.  [Google Scholar]
  34. Ministry of National Education. (2018a). Ministry of National Education Life Science Lesson Education Program (Primary School 1,2 and 3 classes).Ankara.  [Google Scholar]
  35. Ministry of National Education. (2015b). Ministry of National Education Board of Education and Discipline, Social Studies Lesson 4, 5, 6 and 7th Grades Curriculum. Ankara.  [Google Scholar]
  36. Ministry of National Education. (2018b). Ministry of National Education Social Studies Course Curriculum (Primary and Secondary School 4, 5, 6 and 7 classes). Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ministry of National Education. (2019). National education statistics formal education 2018-2019. Strategy Development Directorate of the Ministry of National Education: Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mitchell, D. (2005). Contextualizing inclusive education. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  39. Myles, B. (2003). Overview of Asperger Syndrome. In Social skills training, edited by  J. E. Baker. 9-17. KS: Autism Asperger Publishing Company. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ozmen, R. G. (2009). Creation and presentation of schematic organizers for students with learning disabilities and affected by mental disability in teaching life science, social studies and science, Journal of National Education, 181,  289-301.  [Google Scholar]
  41. Ozpolat, A. (2009). 2005 social studies curriculum in terms of socialization goals.. Journal of National Education, 182,  249-267. [Google Scholar]
  42. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative study and evaluation methods (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Translation .). Ankara: Pegem Publishing. (Publication date of the original book 1990). [Google Scholar]
  43. Piskin, F. B. (1994). The relationship between empathy, anxiety and conflict tendency. Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences, 22(2): 775-784. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sahin, A. (2010). Examination of the problems faced by students who receive education through inclusion in the socialization process according to the opinions of teachers (Erzurum province example). (Master Thesis), Atatürk University Institute of Social Sciences, Erzurum. [Google Scholar]
  45. Salend, S. J. (1998). Effective mainstreaming creating inclusive classrooms. New York: Merril, Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  46. Slee, R. (2011). Their regular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith, P. (2010) . Whatever happened to inclusion? The place of students with intellectual disabilities in general education classrooms. New York: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  48. Snell, M. E.,& Janney, R. (2000). Teachers’ guides to inclusive practices: Social relationships and peer support. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. [Google Scholar]
  49. Soner, O. (2000). Relationships between family cohesion, student self-confidence and academic achievement. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Trend Sciences, 12, 249-260. [Google Scholar]
  50. Staub, D., Peck, C.A., Gallucci, C. & Schwartz, I. (2000). Peer relationships. In E.M. Snell, & F. Brown (Eds). Instruction of Studentswith Severe Disabilities. PrenticeHall, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sucuoglu, B. & Kargin, T (2006). Mainstreaming practices in primary education. Ankara: Morpa. [Google Scholar]
  52. Topping, K. (2012). Conceptions of inclusion: widening ideas. In What Works in Inclusion?, edited by C. Boyle and K. Topping, 9-18. Maidenhead: Open University Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Turkish Dictionary. (2011). Turkish language institution publications (11th edition). Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  54. UNESCO.2005. Guidelines for Inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all: Paris: UNES. [Google Scholar]
  55. Vuran, S. (2007). Individualized education programs. In O, Gursel (Ed.),  Development of individualized education programs, (p.p. 1-10). Eskişehir: Anadolu University Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, H. L. (2009). Should all students with special educational needs (SEN) be included in mainstraem education provision? A critical analysis. International Education Studies, 2(4): 154-161. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yildirim, F. (2011). What does university youth understand from social justice? A trendsetting research in the context of social justice principles. (Doctorate Thesis). Ankara University Institute of Science and Technology, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yildirım, A., & Simsek H. (2018). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zirpoli, J. T., & Melloy, K. J. (1997). Behavior management: Application for teachers. Ohio: Merrill PrenticeHall. [Google Scholar]