International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(1) 266-284

Leader Administrator: A Qualitative Analysis Based on Teacher Opinions

Ramazan Ertürk

pp. 266 - 284   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2107-03-0004.R1

Published online: February 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 147  |  Number of Download: 258


The aim of this study is to determine the leadership roles of school administrators based on teachers’ opinions. The participants of this case study, one of the qualitative research design, were 180 teachers working in 5 elementary schools, 4 secondary schools and 4 high schools in Bolu province in the 2020-2021 academic year. The data were collected using an interview form consisting of semi-structured questions and analyzed using the descriptive analysis method. The findings of the study indicated that the leader manager should be an ethical, facilitating, empowering, instructive, innovative, motivating, supportive and visionary manager. In accordance with the results of this study, it is recommended that school administrators should have an ethical character that exhibits impartial, reliable, fair, constructive, patient, courageous and democratic behavior.

Keywords: Leader, Administrators, Leader Administrators, Teacher Opinions

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Erturk, R. (2022). Leader Administrator: A Qualitative Analysis Based on Teacher Opinions . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 266-284. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.15

Erturk, R. (2022). Leader Administrator: A Qualitative Analysis Based on Teacher Opinions . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), pp. 266-284.

Chicago 16th edition
Erturk, Ramazan (2022). "Leader Administrator: A Qualitative Analysis Based on Teacher Opinions ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (1):266-284. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.15.

  1. Akbaba, A., & Sarıkaya, A. (2017). The determination of the connection between high school managers’ ethic leadership characteristics and organizational trust Perceptions. (Van City Example). International Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2017(8), 285-315. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aktaş, Y. (2008).The role of empowering staff in human resources management: A case study. Unpublished Master Thesis, Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aytaç, T. (2000). School-centered management. Ankara: Nobel Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baki, A., & Gökçek, T. (2012). General overview of mixed method researches. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(12), 1-21. [Google Scholar]
  5. Balcı, Y. (2009). The analysis of relationships between teachers and managers of organizational commitment with educational and transformational leadership behaviours of managers in primary school. Unpublished Master Thesis, Ege University Institute of Social Sciences, İzmir. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadersihip. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.  [Google Scholar]
  7. Bens, I. (2007). The ten essential processes of facilitative leaders. Glob. Bus. Org. Exc., 26, 38-56. doi:10.1002/joe.20163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Bodner, S. L. (2005). Design and empirical analysis of a model of empowering leadership. PhD dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton, USA. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolanle, A. O. (2013). Principals’ leadership skills and school effectiveness: The case of South Western Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 3(5), 26-33. [Google Scholar]
  10. Boonla, D., & Treputtharat, S. (2014). The relationship between the leadership style and school effectiveness in school under the office of secondary education area 20. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 991-996. [Google Scholar]
  11. Buluç, B. (2009). The relationships between organizational commitment and leadership styles of principals based on elementary school teacher’s perceptions. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 15(57), 5-34. [Google Scholar]
  12. Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. NY: Haroper and Row. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bülbül, T. (2012). Efficacy beliefs of school managers regarding innovation management Trakya University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14(1), 45-68. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chou, C., Shen, C., Hsiao, H., & Chen, S. (2010). The influence of innovative organisational management of technological and vocational schools on innovative performance-using organizational innovative climate as the mediator variable. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, (WIETE), 8(2), 237-242. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cormican, K., & O’Sullivan, D. (2004). Auditing best practice for effective product innovation Management. Technovation, 24, 819-829. [Google Scholar]
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative research methods. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.), Ankara: Siyasal Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  17. Çavuş, M. F. (2006). An application in manufacturing industry on the effects of organizational creativity and innovativeness of employee empowerment applications in companies. PhD dissertation, Selçuk University Institute of Social Sciences, Konya. [Google Scholar]
  18. Çelik, V. (2001). School leaders of the future. Turkish National Education Organization and Management National Symposium in 2000, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  19. Çelik, V. (2015). Educational leadership (8th Edition). Ankara: Pagem Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  20. Delice, M., & Gül, Z. (2012). The investigation of the effects of leadership education on students’ leadership attitudes: The Turkish national police example. Ekev Academy Journal, 16(52), 15-28. [Google Scholar]
  21. Erdoğan, İ. (2006). School management and teaching leadership. Istanbul: Sistem Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ertürk, R. (2020). Teacher autonomy: A conceptual analysis. International Pegem education congress (Ipcedu-2020) full text book in (s. 452-464). Ankara: Pegem Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fullan, M. (2007). The New meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2002). The new leaders: Transform ing the art leadership of into the science of results. London: Little, Brown. [Google Scholar]
  25. Göksoy, S. (2014). Participation in decision making in school management. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 14(2), 253-268.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Gökyer, N. (2010). Primary school principals’s levels of realizing instructional leadership roles and the factors limiting these roles. Journal of Ahmet Keleşoğlu Education Faculty, 29, 113-129. [Google Scholar]
  27. Göl, E., & Bülbül, T. (2012). Primary school administrators' perceptions of innovation management competencies. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 8(2), 97-109. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gülşen, C., & Gökyer, N. (2010). Possible factors affecting the implementation of innovations in primary education. Paper presented at the 9th National Primary Education Symposium, Fırat University, Elazığ. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gündüz, Y., & Balyer, A. (2012). An investigation of the effective leadership behaviors of school principals. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 5(2), 237-253. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: a passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hitt, M. A., Miller, C. C., & Colella, A. (2006). Organizational behavior: A strategic approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2012). Educational management: Theory, research and practice. (Trans. Ed. S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.  [Google Scholar]
  33. Jaskyte, K. (2004). Transformational leadership, organizational culture, and innovativeness in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(2), 153-168. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kark, R. (2004). The transformational leader: Who is (s)he? a feminist perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 160-176. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kaya, G. (2008). Study of secondary school teachers? opinions regarding the relationship between principals? Insructional leadership and their decision making abilities. Unpublished Master Thesis, Yeditepe University, Istanbul. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kazancıoğlu, M. M. (2008). Leadership style and school effectiveness of top managers in private schools: İstanbul sample. Unpublished Master Thesis, Yeditepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kış, A., & Konan, N. (2014). A meta-analysis of gender differences in terms of teacher views on the instructional leadership behavior of Principals. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(6), 2129-2145. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kurt, T. (2009). Examination of relationships between transformational and transactional leadership styles of school principals and collective efficacy and self-efficacy of teachers. PhD Dissertation, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lashway, L. (1997). Leardership Styles and Strategies. In Smith. S.C. and Piele, P.K.(Eds.), School Leadership: Handbook for Excellence, University of Oregon: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, Third Edition. [Google Scholar]
  40. Leithwood, K. (2016). Department-head leadership for school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(2), 117-140. [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu, P. (2013). A transformational school leadership model in chinese urban upper secondary schools. ISEA, 41(3), 73-94. [Google Scholar]
  42. Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  43. May, H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to ımprove instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 332-352. [Google Scholar]
  44. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). An expanded source book qualitative data analysis. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  45. Monahan, K. (2012). A review of the literature concerning ethical leadership in organizations. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 5(1), 56-66. [Google Scholar]
  46. Okutan, M. (2003). Administrative behavior of school principals. Journal of National Education, 157, 226-236. [Google Scholar]
  47. Quigley, J. V. (1998). Vision: Creation, development and protection. (Translation: B. Çelik), Istanbul. Epsilon Publishing Speed. Tic. Singing. Ltd. Şti. [Google Scholar]
  48. Özdemir, S., & Sezgin, F. (2002). Effective schools and teaching leadership. Kyrgyzstan Turkey Manas University Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 266-282. [Google Scholar]
  49. Özdoğru, M. (2020). The relationship between school administrators' ınstructional leadership behaviors and their ınstitutional reputation percepti̇ons. PhD Dissertation, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  50. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans. Ed.), Ankara: Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pehlivan, İ. (2001). Managerial professional and organizational ethics. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  52. Peker, Ö., & Aytürk, N. (2000). Effective management skills. Ankara: Yargı Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  53. Patterson, F., Kerrin, M., & Gatto-Roissard, G. (2009). Characteristics and behaviours of innovative people in organisations. NESTA Research Report, documents/characteristics-inno-orgsinterim-report.pdf, (21.01. 2019). [Google Scholar]
  54. Randolph, W. A. (2000). Re-thinking Empowerment: Why, is it so Hard to Achieve? Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 94-107.  [Google Scholar]
  55. Sabuncuoğlu, Z., & Tüz, M. (2001). Organizational psychology. Bursa: Ezgi Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  56. Savaş, G. (2016). Relationship between supportive behaviours of school principals and teacher leadership and examining according to some variables. Master Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  57. Saylık, N. (2015). Determining school principals’ critical leadership competence through teachers’ perspective. Unpublished Master Thesis, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Van. [Google Scholar]
  58. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. USA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  59. Şama, E., & Kolamaz, C. (2011). The relationship between supporting and nourishing leadership characteristics and organizational adherence. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 9(2), 313-342. [Google Scholar]
  60. Şişman, M. (2011). The pursuit of excellence in education, effective schools. Ankara: Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  61. Şişman, M., & Turan, S. (2002). Total quality management in education: Theory and practice. Ankara: PegemA Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  62. Taş, A., Çelik, K., & Tomul, E. (2007). Leadership styles of principals in elementary schools where the new program is implemented in Turkey. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 2(22), 85-98. [Google Scholar]
  63. Töremen, F. (2004). A study of facilitative leadership behavior and its role in the success of school. International Journal of Educational Reform, 13(3), 295-306,  [Google Scholar]
  64. Töremen, F. & Karakuş, M. (2008). Endeavor of making affairs easy in schools: Facilitative leadership in school management. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences,7(25), 1-11. [Google Scholar]
  65. Yalçın, H., & Korkmaz, M. E. (2013). Preschool teachers' conditions of motivation. The Journal of International Social Research, 6(26), 602-609. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2015). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (10th Edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  67. Yıldız, K., & Ertürk, R. (2019). Teachers' views on the administrator and leadership concept: A metaphor study. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal, 19(4), 1190-1216. [Google Scholar]
  68. Yılmaz, E. (2010). Examination of the relationship of ınstructional leadership roles of primary school principals and effective schools. Unpublished Master Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. (2nd ed.). London: Sage. [Google Scholar]