International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(3) 165-182

The Listening Barriers Scale for University Students: A Study of Validity and Reliability

Mehmet Katrancı & Deniz Melanlıoğlu

pp. 165 - 182   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.12   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2108-05-0001.R1

Published online: June 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 111  |  Number of Download: 241


Abstract

Being the most used skill in the school environment as well as being the first skill to be acquired, listening can be defined as making sense of the sounds heard in the communication process and responding as a result of this interpretation. The fact that the response given at the end of a listening process is appropriate for the context is associated with completing the listening process without encountering any obstacles. However, the conducted studies emphasize that students encounter many listening barriers during the listening process. It is considered that it is important for the development of listening skills to detect the barriers to effective listening, which is a major source of school learning, at every education level from pre-school to university. In this context, the aim of the study is to develop a scale to determine the listening barriers encountered by university students in the course process. The data of the research were obtained from 587 students studying in different departments of Kırıkkale University in Turkey. In the development of the measurement tool, literature review, item pooling, content validity (consulting to expert opinion), and pilot scheme stages were followed, and then necessary reliability calculations were carried out. In line with the scores obtained from the tool, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out in order to test the construct validity of the draft scale. As a result of the factor analysis, it was determined that the scale revealed a three-factor structure classified as “teacher related listening barriers”, “student related listening barriers”, and “classroom environment and course related listening barriers”, and the Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficient was detected as .93 for the overall scale. As a result of the research, a 30-item scale was developed to determine the listening barriers encountered by university students.

Keywords: Listening Skill, Listening Barriers, Academic Listening, University Students, Listening Barriers Scale


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Katranci, M. & Melanlioglu, D. (2022). The Listening Barriers Scale for University Students: A Study of Validity and Reliability . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(3), 165-182. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.12

Harvard
Katranci, M. and Melanlioglu, D. (2022). The Listening Barriers Scale for University Students: A Study of Validity and Reliability . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(3), pp. 165-182.

Chicago 16th edition
Katranci, Mehmet and Deniz Melanlioglu (2022). "The Listening Barriers Scale for University Students: A Study of Validity and Reliability ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (3):165-182. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.12.

References
  1. Adelmann, K. (2012). Eavesdropping as listening development. International Journal of Listening Special Issue: Best Practices in the Teaching of Listening, 26(2), 91-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2012.677702  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Akkaya, N., & Ünal, E. (2016). Verbal communication. Ani Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander, J. (2008). Listening the Cinderella profile component of English. English in Education, 42(3), 219-233. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arı, G. (2017). Evaluation of (secondary school) learning outcomes in reading in the Turkish. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 5(4), 685-703. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.331660  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Arıkan, R. (2011). Research methods and techniques. (2nd ed.). Nobel Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ayre, C., & Scally A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Balay, R., & Sağlam, M. (2008). Teachers' views on negative behaviors in the classroom. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 5(2), 1-24. [Google Scholar]
  8. Başkan, A., & Deniz, E. (2015). In-class listening problems of secondary school students (Malatya provınce case). Turkish Studies, 10(7), 179-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8014  [Google Scholar]
  9. Baysen, E., Soylu, H., & Baysen, F. (2003). Questioning and listening durations. Kastamonu Education Journal, 11(1), 53-58.   [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, G. (2011). Listening to spoken English. Routledge Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.  [Google Scholar]
  12. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2011). Quantitative data analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 and 19: A guide for social scientists. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  13. Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific research methods (18nd ed.). Pegem A. [Google Scholar]
  14. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Manual of data analysis for social sciences. Pegem A. [Google Scholar]
  15. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Factor analysis: Basic concepts and using to development scale. Educational Administration Theory and Pratice, 32, 470-483. [Google Scholar]
  16. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretation (24nd ed.). Pegem A. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cangelosi, J. S. (2013). Classroom management strategies. John Wiley&Sons Inc. [Google Scholar]
  18. Çaylı, C. (2012). Evalution of teachers pratices for self-contained listening texts in Turkish lessons’ teacher guide boks at secondary school secondary level [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Erciyes University.  [Google Scholar]
  19. Çifçi, M. (2001). Listening education and factors affecting listening. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 165-177. [Google Scholar]
  20. Danaoğlu, G. (2009). Students misbehaviours and invastigating tackling strategies of primary teachers and branch teachers in fifth classes of primary education [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Çukurova University.  [Google Scholar]
  21. Deniz, M. E. (2006). Communication in the classroom. In R. Arı, & M. E. Deniz (Eds.), Classroom management (pp. 129-150). Nobel Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  22. DeVellis, F. R. (2014). Scale development: Theory and practices. (T. Totan, Ed.). Nobel Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  23. Doğan, Y. (2008). The effectiveness of activity-based studies in improving the listening skills of primary school seventh grade students. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 6(2), 261-286.  [Google Scholar]
  24. Emiroğlu, S. (2013). Turkish teacher candidates’ opinions about listening problems. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 269-307. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.492  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Erkuş, A. (2012). Measurement and scale development in psychology. PegemA.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  27. Göğüş, B. (1978). Turkish and literary education in our secondary schools. Gül Publisher.  [Google Scholar]
  28. Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34, 165-182. [Google Scholar]
  29. Grunkemeyer, F. (1992). Add two cups of flour and one cup of salt. Texas Child Care, 21(4), 25-38. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gürbüz, S. (2019). Structural equation modeling with Amos. Seçkin Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Itkonen, T. (2010). Spoken language proficiency assessment: Assessing speaking, or evaluation acting? [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Helsinki.  [Google Scholar]
  32. Karabay, A. (2014). Classroom pratices of listening texts. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29(3), 81-94. [Google Scholar]
  33. Karatay, H., Dolunay, S. K., & Savaş, Ö. (2014). Active listening feedback usage of Turkish language teachers. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 2(4), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.67920  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Kasten, W. C., & Yıldırım, K. (2011). Suggestions for Turkish students to be good literate. Maya.  [Google Scholar]
  35. Keray, D. B. (2018). Listening problems of middle school students during Turkish lessons and their expectations regardıng solution of these problems. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education (TEKE), 7(4), 2551-2571.  [Google Scholar]
  36. Kurudayıoğlu, M., & Kana, F. (2013). Self-efficacy perception of pre-service Turkish teachers towards listening skills and education. Mersin University Journal of Education, 9(2), 245-258. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: the construction and use of foreign language tests: A teacher’s book. Longmans, Green and Company. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lundsteen, S. (1979). Listening: It’s impact on all levels on reading and the other language arts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English & ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.   [Google Scholar]
  39. Lynch, T. (2009). Teaching second language listening. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lynch, T. (2010). Listening: Sources, skills, and strategies. In R. Kaplan (ed.), Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 74-87.). Oxford University Press.  [Google Scholar]
  41. Lynch, T. (2011). Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2), 79-88. [Google Scholar]
  42. Maden, A., & Durukan, E. (2016). Listening anxieties of Turkish language teacher candidates.  International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education (TEKE), 5(4), 1945-1957. [Google Scholar]
  43. Maden, S. (2013). Why do we not listen? A sociocultural analysis of the inability to listen.  International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education (TEKE), 2(1), 49-83. [Google Scholar]
  44. MEB (2013). Pre-school education program. Publications of the Ministry of National Education. [Google Scholar]
  45. MEB (2018). Secondary education Turkish language and literature course curriculum (9, 10, 11 and 12. classes). Publications of the Ministry of National Education. [Google Scholar]
  46. MEB (2019). Turkish lesson curriculum (Primary school and middle school 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. classes). Publications of the Ministry of National Education. [Google Scholar]
  47. Melanlıoğlu, D. (2019). A study on university students’ academic listening skills: When will the class be over? I am bored!. Language and Literature Studies, 20(20), 311-348. https://doi.org/10.30767/diledeara.635543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  48. Melanlıoğlu, D. (2013). Reliability and validity of the listening anxiety scale for secondary school students. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(11), 851-876. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mendelsohn, D. (1998). Teaching listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 81-101.  [Google Scholar]
  50. Mete, F., & Ayrancı B. B. (2016). University students' views on listening skills. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 4959-4972. [Google Scholar]
  51. Miller, L. (2003). Developing listening skills with authentic materials. ESL Magazine, 6(2), 16-18. [Google Scholar]
  52. Miller, L. (2009). Engineering lectures in a second language: What factors facilitate students’ listening comprehension? Asian EFL Journal, 11(2), 8-30. [Google Scholar]
  53. Morley, J. (1991). Listening comprehension in second/foreign language instruction. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 81-106). Heinle and Heinle.  [Google Scholar]
  54. Nichols, R., & Stevens, L. A. (1974). The art of listening. Science and Technology, 80, 43-44. [Google Scholar]
  55. Orakcı, Ş. (2018). Validity and reliability study of english listening anxiety scale. Asian Journal of Instruction, 6, 40-51. [Google Scholar]
  56. Özbay, M. (2014). Listening training as a language skill. Öncü Book. [Google Scholar]
  57. Özbay, M. (2009). Comprehension techniques-II: Listening training. Öncü Book. [Google Scholar]
  58. Özgözgü Özer, E. (2007). High school teachers' strategies for coping with undesirable behaviors [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Dokuz Eylül University.   [Google Scholar]
  59. Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education.  [Google Scholar]
  60. Polat, M., & Erişti, B. (2018). Development of a foreign language listening anxiety scale. Turkish Studies, 13(11), 1113-1138. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies. [Google Scholar]
  61. Purdy, M. (1997).  What is listening? In M. Purdy, & D. Borisoff (Eds.), Listening in everyday life: A personal and professional approach (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-20). University Press of America.  [Google Scholar]
  62. Robertson, A. K. (2004). Effective listening. (S. Yarmalı, Ed.). Life Publications. [Google Scholar]
  63. Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal (MLJ), 78(2), 199-221.  [Google Scholar]
  64. Sallabaş, M. E. (2008). The relationship between primary school 8th grade students' attitudes towards reading and their reading comprehension skills. İnönü University Journal of Education, 9(16), 141-155.  [Google Scholar]
  65. Sı̇deklı̇, S. (2005). Testing the reading comprehension skills of primary school fifth grade students according to instructive and narrative texts [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University. [Google Scholar]
  66. Stepanoviene, A. (2012). Barriers to academic listening research perspectives.  Darnioji Daugiakalbystė, 1, 134-141.  [Google Scholar]
  67. Swanson, C. (1996, March 14). Who is listening in the classroom? A research paradigm [Conference presentation]. Annual Convention of the International Listening Association.  [Google Scholar]
  68. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Duxbury Press.  [Google Scholar]
  69. Taşkın, Y. (2017). Critical listening attitude scale's validity and reliability study for prospective teachers. International Journal of Language Academy. 5(2), 116-128. [Google Scholar]
  70. Taylor, S. E. (1964). Listening: What research says to the teacher. National Education Association.  [Google Scholar]
  71. Temur, T. (2001). Listening skill, subject area textbook review guide 1-8. Nobel Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  72. Tolunay Kapucuoğlu, A. (2008). Undesirable student behaviors that classroom teachers encounter in the classroom and the coping methods they use against these behaviors [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Uludağ University. [Google Scholar]
  73. Tompkins, G. E.  (2005). Language arts and pratice. California State University, Prentice-Hall Inc. [Google Scholar]
  74. Uluğ, F. (1995). Success in school. İstanbul: Fevzi Publisher. [Google Scholar]
  75. Uyğun, A., & Çetin, D. (2020). 2018 Suitability of learning outcomes in the writing course for creative writing in the 2018 Turkish course curricula. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 8(1), 1-13.  [Google Scholar]
  76. Vandergrift, J. L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191-210.  [Google Scholar]
  77. Wolvin, A., & Coakley, C. (1991). A survey of the status of listening training in some fortune 500 corporations. Communication Education, 40(1), 152-164. [Google Scholar]
  78. Yangın, B. (1994). Behaviors of primary school teachers in Turkish lesson [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hacettepe University.  [Google Scholar]
  79. Yılmaz, M. (2008). Ways to improve reading comprehension skills in Turkish. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 5(9), 131-139.  [Google Scholar]
  80. Yurdugül, H. (2005). Using content validity indexes for content validity in scale development studies. In H. Kıran (Ed.), 14th National Educational Sciences Congress Pamukkale University Faculty of Education (pp. 771-774). TÜBİTAK Publications. [Google Scholar]