International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2023, Vol. 19(2) 135-151

Review of Researches on Pedagogical Content Knowledge Published in ESERA (2009-2019) Conference Books

Şeyma Ulukök Yıldırım

pp. 135 - 151   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2110-06-0002.R1

Published online: April 01, 2023  |   Number of Views: 37  |  Number of Download: 201


This study aims to examine the papers prepared on pedagogical content knowledge published in European Science Education Research Association (2009-2019) conference books from a thematic and methodological point of view. For this purpose, 65 papers were examined. Data were collected through document analysis within the framework of the qualitative research approach. Descriptive analysis was used in the analysis of the data. NVivo 12 program was used to present the research data. Researchers mainly conducted studies on the development/detection of PCK. It has been determined that student knowledge and teaching methods knowledge, which are the components of pedagogical content knowledge, are investigated more. As a sample, it mostly worked with secondary school teachers. The qualitative research method was mainly preferred in the research. It has been determined that tests, interviews, and questionnaires are used primarily as data collection tools. In the data analysis, it was seen that the focus was more on content analysis.

Keywords: Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Conference Proceedings ESERA, Science Education

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Yildirim, S.U. (2023). Review of Researches on Pedagogical Content Knowledge Published in ESERA (2009-2019) Conference Books . International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(2), 135-151. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2023.534.9

Yildirim, S. (2023). Review of Researches on Pedagogical Content Knowledge Published in ESERA (2009-2019) Conference Books . International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(2), pp. 135-151.

Chicago 16th edition
Yildirim, Seyma Ulukok (2023). "Review of Researches on Pedagogical Content Knowledge Published in ESERA (2009-2019) Conference Books ". International Journal of Progressive Education 19 (2):135-151. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2023.534.9.

  1. Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp.1105-1151). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1405-1416. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alshamrani, S. M., & Aldahmash, A. H. (2020). A Systematic review of research articles on science education published in the ESERA proceedings from 2011 to 2017. Education and Science, 45(202), 1-16.  [Google Scholar]
  4. Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Judy Dori, Y. (2012). Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning:teachers‘ challenges and assessment knowledge. Journal Science Education Technology, 21(2), 207-225.  [Google Scholar]
  5. Aydın, S., & Boz, Y. (2012). Review of studies related to pedagogical content knowledge in the context of science teacher education: The Turkish case, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12, 479–505. [Google Scholar]
  6. Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and con¬tent measurement of pedagogical content knowledge, In J. Gess- Newsome (Ed.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp.147-162). Hingham, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  7. Belge- Can., H. (2019). Review of pedagogical content knowledge studies: the case of science education. The Journal of National Education, 48(224), 353-380. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan, K. K. H., & Hume, A. (2019). Towards a consenus model: Literature review of how science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge is investigated. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning PCK in teachers' professional knowledge (pp. 3-76). Singapore: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  9. Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education and Science, 39(174), 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  10. Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12–25.  [Google Scholar]
  11. Ecevit, T., Karagöz, F., & Kaptan, F. (2017). A review of the research studies in science education published in the proceedings of the ESERA conferences (2009-2011-2013). Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(6), 2447-2464. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gess-Newsome, J. And Lederman, N.G. (Eds.) (1999).  Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. London: Kluwer Academics Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28-42). New York, NY Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  14. Grossman, P. (1990). The Making of a Teacher. New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hume, A., Cooper, R., & Borowski, A. (2019). Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teachng science. Singapore: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.  [Google Scholar]
  17. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pe¬dagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 370-391. [Google Scholar]
  18. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of PCK for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome and N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining PCK: The Construct and Its Implications for Science Education (pp. 95-120). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.  [Google Scholar]
  19. Meschede, N., Fiebranz, A., Möller, K., & Steffensky, M. (2017). Teachers' professional vision, pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs: On its relation and differences between pre-service and in-service teachers. Teaching and teacher education, 66, 158-170. [Google Scholar]
  20. Melo, L., Cañada, F., & Mellado, V. (2017). Exploring the emotions in pedagogical content knowledge about the electric field. International Journal of Science Education, 39(8), 1025-1044.  [Google Scholar]
  21. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ormancı, Ü., Çepni, S., Deveci, İ., & Aydın, Ö. (2015). A thematic review of ınteractive whiteboard use in science education: Rationales, purposes, methods and general knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 532-548.  [Google Scholar]
  23. Özcan, C., & Kaptan, F. (2020). Investigation of 2016 UFBMEK and 2017 ESERA papers with socioscientific content by descriptive content analysis. Teacher Education and Instruction 1(1), 14-24. [Google Scholar]
  24. Özkan, U. B. (2019). Document review method for educational science research. Ankara: Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  25. Öztürk, E., & Kaptan, F. (2016). A view on “ESERA 2009” science education researches conferance and its contentstudies about nature of science, argumentation, history, philosophy and sociology of science. Kastamonu Education Journal, 22(2), 649-672. [Google Scholar]
  26. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (pck): pck as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research Science Education, 38, 261-284. [Google Scholar]
  27. Park, S., Jang, J. Y., Chen, Y. C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching? Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 245-260. [Google Scholar]
  28. Park, S., & Suh, J. K. (2015). From portraying toward assessing PCK: Drivers, dilemmas, and directions for future research. In Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 114-129). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  29. Saraç, H. (2017). Researches related to outdoor learning environments in Turkey: content analysis study. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research, 3(2), 60-81. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sayın, V., Uluçınar-Sağır, Ş. & Ermiş, M. (2021). Investigation of postgraduate theses about the pedagogical content knowledge in turkey between the years 2015-2020. Gazi Education Faculty Journal, 41(1), 379-413. [Google Scholar]
  31. Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530-565. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sormunen, K., Hartikainen-Ahia, A., & Jäppinen, I. (2017). Quality of SSI scenarios designed by science teachers. In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research (pp. 103–116). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  35. Şimşek, N., & Boz, N. (2016). Analysis of pedagogical content knowledge studies in the context of mathematics education in Turkey: A meta-synthesis study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(3). [Google Scholar]
  36. Yücel-Toy, B. (2015). A thematic review of preservice teacher education research in turkey and reflections of teacher education policies. Education and Science, 40(178), 23-60.    [Google Scholar]