International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2019, Vol. 15(5) 288-299

Elimination of Writing Difficulty in Primary School: An Action Research

Erol Duran & Arda Karataş

pp. 288 - 299   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.19   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1906-14-0003

Published online: October 16, 2019  |   Number of Views: 409  |  Number of Download: 1079


Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop applications for the elimination of writing difficulties of primary school second year students. For this purpose, the following questions will be answered: “What is the contribution of letter writing practices to the elimination of writing difficulties?”, “How does the practice of word writing contribute to the elimination of writing difficulties?”, “How does the practice of sentence writing contribute to the elimination of writing difficulties?”, “What is the contribution of text writing practices to the elimination of writing difficulties?”, “What is the persistence of the applications to eliminate writing difficulties?” In this research, qualitative model and action research design were used. The participants of this research were consisted of 6 students who were found to have writing problems among the second grade students. In the study, “Repeated Dictation and Motivation Practices” were used to eliminate the writing difficulties of the participants. Multidimensional Legibility Scale was used for data collection tool before and after the applications. When the findings of the study are taken into consideration, there is a positive increase in the elimination of the writing difficulties of the participants. It can be said that the Repeated Dictation and Motivation Practices applied in the study were successful. The practice of dictation which is used in practice is carried out repeatedly in terms of letters, words, sentences and text, and the contribution of the study group to the elimination of writing difficulties is significant. We can say that the motivation studies conducted during the research support the elimination of the writing difficulties of the students. One-to-one interviews with the students, motivating them continuously and receiving family support are also important factors for success.

Keywords: Writing difficulty, repeated dictation, motivation


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Duran, E. & Karatas, A. (2019). Elimination of Writing Difficulty in Primary School: An Action Research . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(5), 288-299. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.19

Harvard
Duran, E. and Karatas, A. (2019). Elimination of Writing Difficulty in Primary School: An Action Research . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(5), pp. 288-299.

Chicago 16th edition
Duran, Erol and Arda Karatas (2019). "Elimination of Writing Difficulty in Primary School: An Action Research ". International Journal of Progressive Education 15 (5):288-299. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.19.

References
  1. Adas, D. ve Bakir, A. (2013). Writing difficulties and new solutions: Blended learning as an approach to improve wiriting abilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(9), 254-266. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aksoy, N. (2003). Eylem araştırması: Eğitimsel uygulamaları iyileştirme ve değiştirmede kullanılacak bir yöntem. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 36, 474-489. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akyol, H. (2000). Yazı öğretimi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 146, 37-48. [Google Scholar]
  4. Akyol, H. (2011). Disgrafi. Eğitimci Öğretmen Dergisi, 1, 8-11. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayraktar, A. ve Seçkin, S. (2012). Yazma güçlükleri ve öğretim yöntemleri. Ankara: Eğiten. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bedel, A. (2003). İlköğretim I. devre programlarındaki okuma-yazma etkinliklerinde akranlarından geri kalan çocukların geri kalmalarına 88 neden olan faktörler ve bunu önlemede stratejik yaklaşımlar. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya. [Google Scholar]
  7. Belet, D. Ş. ve Yaşar, Ş. (2007). Öğrenme stratejilerinin okuduğunu anlama ve yazma becerileri ile türkçe dersine ilişkin tutumlara etkisi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(1), 69-86. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bender, W.N. (2002). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities: Best teaching practices for general and special educators. Thousand Ouks, CA: Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Calp, M. (2013). Yazma problemi olan bir öğrenciye bitişik eğik yazı öğretimi. International Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 1-28. [Google Scholar]
  10. Can, B. ve Altunaş Yavuz, S. (2017). Okuma–yazma güçlüğü: Kimin için? Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 86-113. [Google Scholar]
  11. Datchuk, S.M., & Kubina, R. M. (2012). A review of teaching sentence-level writing skills to students with writing difficulties and learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 180-192.  [Google Scholar]
  12. Duran, E. (2011). Bitişik eğik yazı harflerinin yazım şekillerine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. On Dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 55-69. [Google Scholar]
  13. Erdoğan, Ö., Gülay, A. ve Uzuner, F. G. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin yazma güçlüğüne ilişkin görüşleri. Elektonik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(61), 700-718. [Google Scholar]
  14. Feder, K., & Majnemer, A. (2003). Children’s handwriting evaluation tools and their psychometric properties. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 23(3), 65-84. [Google Scholar]
  15. Graham, S. (1997). Executive control in the revising of students with learning and writing difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (2), 223-234. [Google Scholar]
  16. Graham, S. and Harris, K. R. (2002). The Road less travelled: Prevention and intervention in written language. In K. G. Butler, E. R. Silliman, (Eds.), Speaking, Reading and Writing in Children With Language Learning Disabilities: New Paradigms in Research And Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.  [Google Scholar]
  17. Graham, S., Santoro, J., Berninger, V.W. & Struck, M. (2006). Dimensions of good and poor handwriting legibility in first and second graders: Motor programs, visual-spontial arrangement and letter formation parameter setting. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 43-60. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamstra-Bletz, L., & Blöte, A. (1993). A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school. Journalof Learning Disability, 26, 689-699. [Google Scholar]
  19. İlker, Ö. ve Melekoğlu, M.A. (2017). İlköğretim döneminde özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin yazma becerilerine ilişkin çalışmaların incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 18(3), 443-469. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaya, B. (2016). Yazma güçlüğü olan bir ilkokul 4. sınıf öğrencisine bitişik eğik yazı öğretimi. Turkish Studies, 11(3), 1407-1434. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kodan, H. (2016). Yazma güçlüğü olan 2. sınıf öğrencisinin el yazısı okunaklılığının geliştirilmesi: Eylem araştırması. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2, 523-539. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuşdemir, Y., Kurban, H. ve Bulut, P. (2018). Yazma güçlüğü yaşayan bir öğrenci ile ilgili eylem araştırması. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 7(2), 1190-1209. [Google Scholar]
  23. MacArthur, C.A. (2000). New tools for writing: assistive technology for students with writing difficulties. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 85-100. [Google Scholar]
  24. Marr, D., & Cermak, S. (2001). Consistency of handwriting development in the early elemantary years: a literature review. The Israel Journal of Occuptional Therapy, 10, 109-129. [Google Scholar]
  25. Raimes, A. (1983). Tecniques in teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosenblum, S., Weiss, P.L., & Parush, S. (2003). Product and process evoluation of handwriting difficulties: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 41-81. [Google Scholar]
  27. Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2003). Can students with LD become competent writers? Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(2), 129-141. [Google Scholar]
  28. Taşkaya, S.M. ve Yetkin, R. (2015). İlköğretim 1-5. sınıf öğrencilerinde görülen yazma sorunlarına ilişkin sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüş ve çözüm önerileri. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(9), 157-169. [Google Scholar]
  29. Walker, B., Shippen, M. E., Alberto, P., Houchins, D. E., & Cihak, D. F. (2005). Using the expressive writing program to imprave the writing skills of high school student with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Pratice, 20(9), 175-183. [Google Scholar]
  30. Westwood, P. (2008). What teacher need to know about reading and writing difficulties. Australia: Acer Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. White, K. M. (2013). Associations between teacher–child relationships and children’s writing in kindergarten and first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28,166–176.  [Google Scholar]
  32. Yıldız, M. (2013). Yazma güçlüğü (disgrafi) olan bir ilkokul 2. sınıf öğrencisinin el yazısı okunaklılığının geliştirilmesi: Eylem araştırması. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16, 282-311. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yıldız, M. ve Ateş, S. (2010). İlk okuma yazmayı farklı yöntemlerle öğrenen ilköğretim 3. sınıf öğrencilerinin yazılarının okunaklılık ve yazım hataları bakımından karşılaştırılması. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(1), 11-30. [Google Scholar]