International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210
International Journal of Progressive Education
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2020, Vol. 16(6) 202-214

The Opinions of the Classroom Teachers about the Enrichment Educational Programs for Gifted Students Who Continue to the Inclusive Classes

Tansel Yazıcıoğlu & Deniz Akdal

pp. 202 - 214   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.12   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2003-18-0001.R1

Published online: December 07, 2020  |   Number of Views: 170  |  Number of Download: 597

Save PDF

Abstract

The enrichment model is a model that aims to be used in the education of gifted children and is based on the development of some additional programs for children. Enrichment educational programs (EEP) consist of high-level content products and processes which are designed to develop problem solving skills, to support creativity and independent learning and which are based on the individualized programs and teaching. The aim of this study is to determine the views of the classroom teachers about the EEPs designed for gifted students who continue their education through inclusion in primary schools. Therefore, the case study model, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. The participants of the study are ten primary school teachers who taught gifted students. The data were collected using the “Semi-structured interview form” which was developed by the authors. The findings of the research show that the teachers do not have knowledge about the EEP practices in general. Therefore, there is a need for the support of the field experts in the planning and implementation of the EEPs.

Keywords: Gifted Children, Enrichment Educational Programs, Inclusive Education

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Yazicioglu, T. & Akdal, D. (2020). The Opinions of the Classroom Teachers about the Enrichment Educational Programs for Gifted Students Who Continue to the Inclusive Classes . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(6), 202-214. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.12

Harvard
Yazicioglu, T. and Akdal, D. (2020). The Opinions of the Classroom Teachers about the Enrichment Educational Programs for Gifted Students Who Continue to the Inclusive Classes . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(6), pp. 202-214.

Chicago 16th edition
Yazicioglu, Tansel and Deniz Akdal (2020). "The Opinions of the Classroom Teachers about the Enrichment Educational Programs for Gifted Students Who Continue to the Inclusive Classes ". International Journal of Progressive Education 16 (6):202-214. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.12.
References
  1. Akar, İ. (2015). Competencıes for a classroom teacher to support gıfted students ın the regular classrooms. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Hacettepe University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ataman, A. (Ed.). (2003). “Gifted and highly talented”. Children with special needs and introduction to special education. (173-195.ss). Ankara: Gündüz Education and Publishing.  [Google Scholar]
  3. Ataman, A. (Ed.). (2007). Gifted children and enrichment. Ataman A., Aydoğan Y. and Bilgiç N. (Ed.), Increasing the professional qualifications of teachers working in science and art centers. 3–7 September. Ankara: Sentez Typography, 13–60. [Google Scholar]
  4. Çitil, M. (2016). Positive behaviour support based preventive classroom management practices for gifted students: an action research. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  5. Çitil, M. and Ataman, A. (2018). The reflection of the primary level gifted students’ behavioral characteristics to the educational settings and the problems that may arise. Gazi University Gazi Journal of Education Faculty, 38(1), 185-231. [Google Scholar]
  6. Çoruhlu, Ş. T. (2013). Investigation the effects of learning environment enriched with 5e model on students’ achievement. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Educational Sciences, Trabzon. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cutts, N. E. and Moseley, N. (2004). Education of gifted and talented children (İsmail Ersevim, Translator.). İstanbul: Özgür Publications. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dağlıoğlu, H. E. (2004). Education of gifted children in preschool age. 1. Turkey Gifted in the Proceedings of the Congress (75-85). İstanbul: Children's Foundation Publications. [Google Scholar]
  9. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., and Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5. Printing). Boston: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dill, M. (2012). Classroom behavior management for gifted and talented programs. http://www.brighthubeducation.com/teaching-gifted-students/38463classroom behavior management-for-gifted-students/  [Google Scholar]
  12. Dönmez, N. (2004). Arrangements to be made in the establishment and operation of Science and Art Centers. Kulaksızoğlu A., Bilgili A. E and Şirin M. R. (Ed.). First congress of Turkey gifted children, gifted children's book report. İstanbul: Children's Foundation Publications, 69–84. [Google Scholar]
  13. Durukan, A. (2018). Investigating the effects of virtual reality enriched learning environment on pre-service science teachers. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Institute of Educational Sciences, Van. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dümenci, S. B., Gürsoy, F. and Aral, N. (2016). Education of highly gifted and gifted children at preschool period in turkey. Kastamonu Education Journal, 24(5), 24-69. [Google Scholar]
  15. Enç, M., Çağlar, D., and Özsoy, Y. (1987). Starting special education. Ankara: Ankara University Faculty of Educational SciencesYayınları Publications. [Google Scholar]
  16. Enç, M. (2004). History of special education. M. R. Şirin, A. Kulaksızoğlu, A. E. Bilgili (June). Gifted children congress selected articles book (195-210. pp). İstanbul: Children's Foundation Publications. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fiddyment, G. E. (2014). Implementing enrichment cluster in elementary schools: Lessons learned. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 287-296. Doi: 10.11770016986214547635 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gareis, C. R., and Tschannen-Moran, M. (2005). Cultivating principals’ sense of efficacy: Supports that matter. Paper to be presented at the annual meeting of the UniversityCouncil for Educational Administration, Nashville, TN. http://coe.ksu.edu/ucea/2005/TschannenUCEA2005.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. İdin, Ş. and Aydoğdu, C. (2016). The effect of enriched educational practices on seventh grade students' science course achievement attitudes and retention. 12. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, September, Trabzon. [Google Scholar]
  20. İkikat, U. (2019). The effect of enriched science course on the creative thoughts of primary school students. (Unpublished Master Thesis), İstanbul Aydın University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kahraman, B. P. (2012). The effects of enriched parental involvement dimension in preschool education program on 5-6 year old children’s school readiness. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Uludağ University Institute of Educational Sciences, Bursa. [Google Scholar]
  22. Koyuncu, B. (2009). The effect of enriched and semi-enriched brain compatible instructional design, developed for the fifth grade science and technology course, on students achievement, interest towards the lesson and retention of learning. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Yıldız Technical University Institute of Social Sciences , İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lashway, L. (2003). Role of the school leader: Trends and issues. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(3), 240-58. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, S.-Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., and Peternel, P. (2010). Achievement after participation in a preparatory program for verbally talented students. Roeper Review, 32, 150-163. doi: 10.11770016986207311152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Levent, F. (2011). Gifted children's rights handbook for parents and teachers. İstanbul: Children's Foundation Publications. [Google Scholar]
  26. Marangoz, D. (2018). The effect of mechanical mind games on mental skill levels of primary school second grade students. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya. [Google Scholar]
  27. Markusic, M. (2012). Unusual Behaviors of Gifted Students http://www.brighthubeducation.com/teaching-gifted-students/49993disciplining-bad behavior-in-gifted-children/ [Google Scholar]
  28. Marsh, H. W. (2005). Big-fish–little-pond effect on academic self-concept. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 19, 119–127. [Google Scholar]
  29. Marsh, H. W., and Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163. [Google Scholar]
  30. Marsh, H. W., and Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish–little-pond effect on academic selfconcept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364–376. [Google Scholar]
  31. Marsh, H. W., and Hau, K. T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal– external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 56–67 [Google Scholar]
  32. Odom, S. L. (2000). Preschool inclusion: What we know and where we go from here. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(1), 20-27. [Google Scholar]
  33. Özbay, Y. (2013). Gifted children and their families. Ankara: T.C. Ministry of Family and Social Policies, General Directorate of Family and Community Services Publications. PDF book. ISBN: 978-605-4628- 44 [Google Scholar]
  34. Özdemir, G. (2017). An action research about enriched curriculum towards the contribution to scientific process skills and achievement for gifted students. (Unpublished Master Thesis), University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  35. Özmen, K. (2017). Effects of epistemologically enhanced instruction on ninth grade students' physics related personal epistemology and achievement in physics. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), Middle East Technical University Institute of Science journal of education faculty, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  36. Markowitz, D. Z. (2004). Evaluation of the long-term impact of a university high school summer science program on students’ interest and perceived abilities in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 395-407. [Google Scholar]
  37. Renzulli, J. S., and Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: New directions for developing high-end learning. In N. Colangelo and G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (136-154. pp). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Reis, S. M., and Boeve, H. (2009). How academically gifted elementary, urban students respond to challenge in an enriched, differentiated reading program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(2), 203-240. [Google Scholar]
  39. Robert, J.L. (2005). Enrichment opportunities for gifted learners. USA: Prufrock Press Inc. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sak, U. (2012). Identification and training of gifted children. Vize Publishing, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  41. Saracho, O. N. (1998). A Study of the Roles Early Chilhood Teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 43-56. [Google Scholar]
  42. Schiever, S. W., and Maker, C. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. In N. Colangelo & G. A Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., 163- 173. pp). Boston: Allyn and Bacon [Google Scholar]
  43. Stake, J. E., and Mares, K. R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1065-1088. doi:10.1002/tea.10001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  44. Şahin, S. (2016). Evaluation of the effects of enriched education program (EEP) on students' critical thinking skills, problem solving skills and mathematics anxiety. Doctoral Thesis, Dumlupınar University Institute of Educational Sciences, Kütahya. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tekfidan, K. (2018). A study of phenomenology: The activities enriched teaching history of science in physics education. Master Thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  46. Uluç, E. (2019). The effect of enriched curriculum on geometry and visual perception achivements, and attitudes towards mathematics. Master Thesis, Adnan Menders University Institute of Social Sciences, Aydın.  [Google Scholar]
  47. Walsh, R. L., Kemp, C. R., Hodge, K. A., and Bowes, J. M. (2012). Searching for evidence-based practice: A review of the research on education interventions for intellectually gifted 31 children in the early childhood years. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 103- [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 16 Issue 6

December 2020

All Articles

International Journal of Progressive Education

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.