- Alvares, O. H. (2006). Developing digital litarecies: Educational initiatives and research in Colombia. In M. McKenna, L. Labbo, R. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology. (Vol. II) (pp. 29-40). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
- Anand, P. G., & Ross, S. M. (1987). Using computer-assisted instruction to personalize arithmetic materials for elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 72-78. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, R. C. & Pearson P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 225-253). New York: Longman. [Google Scholar]
- Andre, T., Mueller, C., Womack, Smid, K. & Tuttle, M. (1980). Adjunct application questions facilitate application. Or do they? Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 533-543. [Google Scholar]
- Bates, E. T., & Wiest, L. R. (2004). Impact of personalization of mathematical word problems on student performance. The Mathematic Educator, 14(2), 17-26. [Google Scholar]
- Bracken, B. A. (1982). Effects of personalized basal stories on the reading comprehension of fourth-grade poor and average readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology,7, 320-324. [Google Scholar]
- Bus, A.G., De Jong, M. T., & Verhallen, M. (2006). CD-ROM talking books: A way to enhance early literacy? In M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, R. D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology, Volume II (pp. 129-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
- Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458- 464. [Google Scholar]
- Davis-Dorsey, J. K. (1989). The role of context personalization and problem rewording in the solving of math word problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Memphis State University, Memphis. [Google Scholar]
- DeMoulin, D. F. (2001). The hidden value of personalization and rhyme in reading. Reading Improvement, 38(3), 116-118. [Google Scholar]
- Doty, D.E. (1999). CD-ROM storybooks and reading comprehension of young readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ball State University, Muncie. [Google Scholar]
- Doty, D.E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O. (2001). Interactive CD-ROM storybooks and young readers' reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 374-384. [Google Scholar]
- Duke, N. K., Schmar-Dobler, E., & Zhang, S. (2006). Comprehension and technology. In M. McKenna, L. Labbo, R. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology. (Vol. II) (pp. 317-326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
- Dwyer, H.J. (1996). Effects of personalization on reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe. [Google Scholar]
- Gambrell, L. B. (2006). Technology and the engaged literacy learner. In M. McKenna, L. Labbo, R. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology. (Vol. II) (pp. 289-294). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
- Glasgow, J. (1997). It's my turn! Part II: Motivating young readers using CD-ROM storybooks. Learning and Leading with Technology, 24, 18-22. [Google Scholar]
- Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume III (pp. 403-422). New York: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
- Matthew, K. (1997). A comparison of influence of interactive CD-ROM storybooks. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(3), 263-276. [Google Scholar]
- Lopez, C. L. (1990). Personalizing math problems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 323 939). [Google Scholar]
- Paris, S. G., & Hamilton, E. E. (2009). Development of Children‘s Reading Comprehension. In S. E. Israel, & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension. (pp. 32-53). New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand. [Google Scholar]
- Rasinski, T., & Padak, N. (2004). Effective reading strategies: Teaching children who find reading difficult (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
- Reinking, D. (1998). Introduction: Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a post-typographic world (pp. xi-xxx). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
- Robb, L. (2000). Teaching reading in the middle school. New York: Scholastic. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, F.L. (1974). The effects on social studies achievement of multiple students responding to different levels of questioning. Journal of Experimental Education, 42, 71-75. [Google Scholar]
- Shinas, V.H. (2012). Reading path and comprehension: An investigation of eight-grade skilled readers‟ engagement with online, multimodal texts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Delaware, Newark. [Google Scholar]
- Şimşek, N., & Çakır, Ö. (2009). Effect of personalization on students‘ achievement and gender factor in mathematics education. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), 278-282. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, L., & Adelman, H. S. (1999). Personalizing classroom instruction to account for motivational and developmental differences. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15(4), 255-277. [Google Scholar]
|
