International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(1) 298-321

Analysis of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development of Prospective Teachers in the Lesson Plan Development Process: 4MAT Model

Feyza Aliustaoğlu & Abdulkadir Tuna

pp. 298 - 321   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.17   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2107-15-0001

Published online: February 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 61  |  Number of Download: 165


Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the change of prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) on the linear equation and slope subject based on the lesson plan development and implementation process based on the 4MAT model. The concept of PCK was discussed in three components as content knowledge, knowledge of student understanding and knowledge of instructional strategies. The research was carried out based on mixed research methods. The data collection tools consisted of 48 lesson plans developed by prospective teachers in three stages and observation notes taken based on the teachings they did. The lesson plans developed by prospective teachers were analyzed quantitatively using the rubric developed by the researcher. Whether there is a statistically significant difference in PCK components in the lesson plans was analyzed by using appropriate tests. In addition, various qualitative sections from the lesson plans showing the development of prospective teachers were presented. As a result of the research, it was concluded that prospective teachers showed improvement in each of the components of the PCK at the end of the lesson plan development and implementation process based on the 4MAT model.

Keywords: Mathematics Education, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, 4MAT Model, Prospective Teachers, Lesson Plans


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Aliustaoglu, F. & Tuna, A. (2022). Analysis of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development of Prospective Teachers in the Lesson Plan Development Process: 4MAT Model . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 298-321. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.17

Harvard
Aliustaoglu, F. and Tuna, A. (2022). Analysis of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development of Prospective Teachers in the Lesson Plan Development Process: 4MAT Model . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), pp. 298-321.

Chicago 16th edition
Aliustaoglu, Feyza and Abdulkadir Tuna (2022). "Analysis of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development of Prospective Teachers in the Lesson Plan Development Process: 4MAT Model ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (1):298-321. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.17.

References
  1. Aktas, İ., & Bilgin, İ. (2015). The effect of the 4MAT learning model on the achievement and motivation of 7th grade students on the subject of particulate nature of matter and an examination of student opinions on the model. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(1), 1-21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alanazi, F. H. (2020). The effectiveness of the 4MAT teaching approach in enhancing conceptions of electricity in physics for female students in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 271-288. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aydıntan, S., Şahin, H., & Uysal, F. (2020). The effect of 4MAT learning style model on academic achievement and permanence while teaching “Fractions”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 23(1), 408-427. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baki, M. (2012). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematiği öğretme bilgilerinin gelişiminin incelenmesi: bir ders imecesi (lesson study) çalışması [Investigating development of prospective primary teachers' mathematical pedagogical content knowledge: lesson study] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Karadeniz Technical University. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baki, M., & Arslan, S. (2015). Ders imecesinin (lesson study) sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematik dersini planlama bilgilerine etkisinin incelenmesi [Examining the effect of lesson study on prospective primary teachers’ knowledge of lesson planning]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 209-229. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. [Google Scholar]
  7. Burkum, K. (2010). Retention: Diverse institutions= diverse retention practices. Chicago, IL: ACT. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bütün, M. (2012). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının uygulanan zenginleştirilmiş program sürecinde matematiği öğretme bilgilerinin gelişimi [The development of pedagogical content knowledge of preservice mathematics teachers in the process of applied enriched program] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Karadeniz Technical University. [Google Scholar]
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  10. Can, A. (2017). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS]. Ankara: Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  11. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.  [Google Scholar]
  12. Ergin, S. (2011). Fizik eğitiminde 4MAT öğretim yönteminin farklı öğrenme stillerine sahip lise öğrencilerinin iş, güç ve enerji konusundaki başarısına etkisi [Effects of the 4MAT instruction method on the achievement of high school students with different learning styles on the subjects of work, power and energy in physics education] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.  [Google Scholar]
  13. Eroğlu, D. (2016). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin tahmini öğrenme yollarına dayalı öğretimlerindeki pedagojik yollarının desteklenmesi [Supporting middle school mathematics teachers' pedagogical ways in their teachings based on hypothetical learning trajectories] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Anadolu University. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferna´ndez, M. L. (2010). Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through microteaching lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 351– 362. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gökkurt, B. (2014). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin geometrik cisimler konusuna ilişkin pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi [An examination of secondary school mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge on geometric shapes] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Atatürk University. [Google Scholar]
  16. İnel, Y. (2018). The effect of 4MAT method on the academic achievement of students in social studies education. Review of International Geographical Education Online (RIGEO), 8(3), 440-458. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaewkiriya, T. (2017). Design of e-learning content for student guidance based on ILS and 4MAT theory. in Communication Systems, Computing and IT Applications (CSCITA), 2nd International Conference on. 2017. IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kelley, L. S. (1990). Using 4MAT to improve staff development, curriculum assesment and planning. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 38-39. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lim, W., Son, J. W. and Kim, D. J. (2018). Understanding preservice teacher skills to construct lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 519-538. [Google Scholar]
  20. McCarthy, B. (1990). Using the 4MAT System to bring learning styles to schools. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 31–37.  [Google Scholar]
  21. McCarthy, B., Germain, C., & Lippitt, L. (2002). The 4MAT research guide. Wauconda, IL: About Learning Inc. [Google Scholar]
  22. McCarthy, B. (2014). 4MAT pure and simple: Learning about learning. Wauconda, IL: About Learning Inc. [Google Scholar]
  23. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  24. Morris, S., & B. McCarthy. (1999). 4MAT in action. Barrington, IL: Excel, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  25. Naseer, M. S. (2016). Algebraic content and pedagogical knowledge of sixth grade mathematics teachers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Walden.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Nielsen, L. S. (2009). The relationship between pedagogical content knowledge and mathematics teacher questioning strategies [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].  Louisiana Tech University.  [Google Scholar]
  27. Omar, M. S., Al-Shunnaq, M. M., & Al-Omari, W. H. (2018). The effectiveness of using 4MAT model in the development of metacognitive thinking in mathematics among 7th grade students in palestine. Journal of Al-Quds Open University for Educational & Psychological Research & Studies, 9(26), 184-197. [Google Scholar]
  28. Özdoğan, Z. B. (2012). 4MAT öğretim modelinin ilköğretim matematik öğretmenleri tarafindan uygulanması sürecinden yansımalar [Reflections of practice of 4MAT education model by elementary school mathematic teachers] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Karadeniz Technical University. [Google Scholar]
  29. Özgen, K., & Alkan, H. (2012). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme ortamında öğrenme stillerine uygun geliştirilen etkinliklere yönelik öğrenci görüşlerinin incelenmesi [An analysis of student views on activities developed according to learning styles within a constructivist learning environment] Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty Journal, 18, 239-258. [Google Scholar]
  30. Shaughnessy, M.F. (2013). An Interview with Bernice McCarthy: Creator of The 4MAT® System. Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), 2(4), 196-198. [Google Scholar]
  31. Seviş, Ş. (2008). The effects of a mathematics teaching methods course on pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ content knowledge for teaching mathematics [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shuilleabhain, A. N. (2016). Developing mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(3), 212-226. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ramirez, I., & Laurencio,O. (2015). English oral communicative competence of future teachers: A second work-integrated experience at Bindura University of Science Education. Journal of Teaching and Education (JTE), 4(2), 91-94. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rusznyak, L., & Walton, E. (2011). Lesson planning guidelines for student teachers: A scaffold for the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Education as Change, 15(2), 271-285. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tataroğlu Taşdan, B., & Çelik, A. (2017). Matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel düşünmeyi destekleme bağlamındaki pedagojik alan bilgileri nasıl geliştirilebilir? [How could the mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in the context of supporting mathematical thinking be developed?]. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE), 6(2), 40-55. [Google Scholar]
  37. Taylor, B. (2018). Activating creativity in elementary EFL writing. In E. Polyudova (Ed.), Acquiring lingua franca of the modern time current issues and strategies in ESL studies (pp. 119-150). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsai, H. S. (2004). Learning achievement satisfaction and retention with wholebrain instruction among nursing students at a technology college in taiwann [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Idaho State University.  [Google Scholar]
  39. Wright, T. D. (2009). Investigating teachers’ perspectives on the impact of the lesson study process on their mathematical content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and the potential for student achievement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].  University of New Orleans.  [Google Scholar]
  40. Yeşildere İmre, S., & Akkoç, H. (2012). Investigating the development of prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of generalising number patterns through school practicum. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(3), 207-226. [Google Scholar]