International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210
International Journal of Progressive Education
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(2) 291-308

Investigating the Scientific Research Inception Process From the Perspectives of Physicists

Sezen Apaydın, Ayhan Karaman & Hüsnü Baysal

pp. 291 - 308   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.431.19   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2102-16-0001.R2

Published online: April 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 226  |  Number of Download: 354

Save PDF

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to explore how physicists start their research studies, how they identify their research questions and what factors influence their involvement in studying a specific research problem. The grounded theory methodology was adopted in the study by considering the qualitative nature of the research questions. The study was completed in two stages. At the initial stage of the study, face-to-face interviews were conducted with physicists to elicit the diversity of their views about the research inception process. At the second stage, an empirically-based multiple-choice survey was prepared on the basis of the themes generated from the responses of the interviewees. 140 physicists working in several Turkish universities completed the survey to reveal how common the diverse views, which were extracted from the interviews, among other physicists. The study results indicated that although physicists started their research studies mostly with a problem, they did not necessarily look actively for a problem when starting a new research study because new problems had already been identified during their previous research. According to the participant physicists, the research inception process was affected by a number of factors related with the available resources and the individual scientist conducting a given research study. These obtained results were discussed in terms of nature of science and nature of scientific inquiry, which are critical issues in science education.

Keywords: Scientists, Scientific Research Inception, Nature of Science

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Apaydin, S., Karaman, A. & Baysal, H. (2022). Investigating the Scientific Research Inception Process From the Perspectives of Physicists . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2), 291-308. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.431.19

Harvard
Apaydin, S., Karaman, A. and Baysal, H. (2022). Investigating the Scientific Research Inception Process From the Perspectives of Physicists . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2), pp. 291-308.

Chicago 16th edition
Apaydin, Sezen, Ayhan Karaman and Husnu Baysal (2022). "Investigating the Scientific Research Inception Process From the Perspectives of Physicists ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (2):291-308. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.431.19.
References
  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.629013  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument : “ Views on science- technology-society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760503  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Akdemir, E., & Çetin-Atasoy, D. (2019). Ortaokul ve imam hatip ortaokulu fen bilimleri 7. sınıf ders kitabı. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları.  [Google Scholar]
  4. Allchin, D. (2017). Beyond the consensus view: Whole science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271921  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Aydeniz, M., & Bilican, K. (2014). What do scientists know about the nature of science? A case study of novice scientists’ views of NOS. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1083–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9449-1  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Aydın, A., Çelik, A., Yılmaz, İ., Soyarslan, K., Erat, M., & Bozarslan, Ş. (2019). Fen lisesi fizik 9. sınıf ders kitabı. Ankara:Devlet Kitapları. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhushan, N., & Rosenfeld, S. (2000). Of minds and molecules: New philosophical perspectives on chemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bostan-Sarıoğlan, A. (2018). Assessment of preservice science teachers’ views about scientific inquiry after training. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (48), 136–159. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maeuefd/issue/39596/402615  [Google Scholar]
  9. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  10. Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  11. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hodson, D., & Wong, S. L. (2014). From the horse’s mouth: Why scientists’ views are crucial to nature of science understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2639-2665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.927936  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Irzik, G, & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 999–1021). Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  14. Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 20(7–8), 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Kampourakis, K. (2013). Philosophy of biology and biology education: An introduction. In K. Kampourakis (Ed.), The philosophy of biology a companion for educators (pp. 1–29). Springer. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understanding about scientific inquiry - the views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Lederman, N., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9503-3  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. Lederman, N. G. (2006). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In N. Flick & L. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 301–317). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  19. Matthews, M. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mayr, E. (1997). This is biology – The science of the living world. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. McComas W.F., & Olson, J. K. (2002). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationale sand strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  22. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and equality in education (Vol. I). OECD.  [Google Scholar]
  23. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Schizas, D., Psillos, D., & Stamou, G. (2016). Nature of science or nature of the sciences? Science Education, 100(4), 706-733. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21216  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Schwartz, R. (2004). Epistemological views in authentic science practice: A cross-discipline comparison of scientists’ views of nature of science and scientific inquiry. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oregon State University, Oregon, USA. [Google Scholar]
  26. Schwartz, R., & Lederman, N. (2008). What Scientists Say: Scientists’ views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701225801  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083020  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Tala, S., & Vesterinen, V. M. (2015). Nature of science contextualized: Studying nature of science with scientists. Science & Education, 24(4), 435-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9738-2  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Tira, P. (2009). Comparing scientists’ views of nature of science within and across disciplines, and levels of expertise. . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Indiana, USA. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wong, S., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse’s mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20290  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  32. Yenice, N., & Özden, B. (2016). Scientific research begins with a research question; milk activity. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 153–158. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/trkefd/issue/24152/256286  [Google Scholar]
  33. Yıldırım, F. S., Aydın, A., & Sarıkavak, İ. (2019). Ortaokul ve imam hatip ortaokulu fen bilimleri 6. sınıf ders kitabı. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 18 Issue 2

April 2022

All Articles

International Journal of Progressive Education

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.