International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 2834-7919   |  e-ISSN: 1554-5210
International Journal of Progressive Education
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2022, Vol. 18(3) 71-90

Can an Understanding of Personal Barriers to Coaching be Transposed to Provide an Understanding of Personal Barriers to Learning for English Boys in a Post-16 Education Context?

Voldis Kudliskis

pp. 71 - 90   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.6   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2012-09-0002.R1

Published online: June 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 98  |  Number of Download: 323

Save PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine whether some personal inner and outer barriers found in coaching are reflected as personal inner and outer barriers to learning for boys in a post-16 education setting. The study predominantly sits within the interpretivist paradigm. This was an action research focus group case study that utilised a single qualitative methods approach. Participants, boys, engaged in a semi-structured interview that specifically examined their views relating to some personal inner and outer barriers to learning. It is a single-site, multi-voice study. ‘Positions of Consensus’ and individual comments are presented in relation to experiences of some inner and outer barriers to learning and the impact of these on engagement with learning. The results suggest that some inner and outer barriers identified in coaching can be transposed to aid understanding of some inner and outer barriers to learning. The outcome of this research provides some speculative evidence for boys, educationalists, managers, teachers and parents that some inner and outer barriers to learning impact negatively on engagement with learning for year 13 boys (boys between 17 and 19 years of age).

Keywords: Education; Coaching; Inner and Outer Barriers to Learning; Post-16 Education; Boys and Learning

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kudliskis, V. (2022). Can an Understanding of Personal Barriers to Coaching be Transposed to Provide an Understanding of Personal Barriers to Learning for English Boys in a Post-16 Education Context? . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(3), 71-90. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.6

Harvard
Kudliskis, V. (2022). Can an Understanding of Personal Barriers to Coaching be Transposed to Provide an Understanding of Personal Barriers to Learning for English Boys in a Post-16 Education Context? . International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(3), pp. 71-90.

Chicago 16th edition
Kudliskis, Voldis (2022). "Can an Understanding of Personal Barriers to Coaching be Transposed to Provide an Understanding of Personal Barriers to Learning for English Boys in a Post-16 Education Context? ". International Journal of Progressive Education 18 (3):71-90. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.6.
References
  1. Abdulla, A. (2017). Coaching students in secondary schools: Closing the gap between performance and potential. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  2. Association for Coaching. (2018). Coaching definitions. Retrieved www.associationforcoaching.com/page/CoachingDefined (25th October 2020). [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkins, L. & Wallace, S. (2012). Qualitative research in education. London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandler, R. & Grinder, J. (1975). The structure of magic I. Palo Alto, California: Science and Behaviour Books. [Google Scholar]
  5. Barry, W.J., (2012). How can I improve my life-affirming, need-fulfilling, and performance enhancing capacity to understand and model the meaning of educational quality? PhD. Nottingham Trent University (published thesis). [Google Scholar]
  6. Bazeley, P. & Molina-Azorin, J.F. (2018). Conducting mixed methods research for business and management students (mastering business research methods) (1st edition). London: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
  7. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders. New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Berg, A.M. & Eikeland, O. (Eds.). (2008). Action Research and Organisational Theory. (Labour, education and Society series, Vol. 9) Oxford: Peter Lang Publications. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, S.W. & Grant, A.M. (2010). From GROW to GROUP: theoretical issues and a practical model for group coaching in organisations. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3(1), 30-45. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cappella, E., Hamre, B. K., Kim, H. Y., Henry, D. B., Frazier, S. L., Atkins, M. S., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2012). Consultation and coaching in urban elementary schools: Results from a community mental health trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 80, 597–610. [Google Scholar]
  11. Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical. Education, Knowledge and Action research. Lewes: Falmer. [Google Scholar]
  12. Carter. A, Blackman. A, & Hicks, B. (2014) Barriers to successful outcomes from coaching. In: Proceedings of the Fourth EMCC Mentoring and Coaching Conference, pp. 112-131. From: Fourth EMCC Mentoring and Coaching Conference, 26-27 June 2014, Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cooper, H. A. (2016). Research synthesis and meta-Analysis: a step-by-step approach (applied social research methods) (5th edition.). London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  14. Corgo, M. & Mercer, S. L. (2008) The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health 29, 325-350. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cox, E., Bachkirova, T. & Clutterbuck, D. (2016). The SAGE handbook of coaching. London: SAGE publications. [Google Scholar]
  16. Creazy, J. & Paterson, F. (2005). Leading coaching in schools. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dawson, P. & Guare, R. (2012). Coaching students with corrective skills deficits. New York: Guildford Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunham, J. (1992). Stress in Teaching (2nd edition). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  19. Edwards, R. & Holland, J. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing? London: Bloomsbury. [Google Scholar]
  20. Golby, M. (1994). Case study as educational research. University of Exeter. Research Educational Research Monograph Series. Exeter. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gorby, C. (1937). Everyone gets a share of the profits. Factory Management and Maintenance. 95, 82-83. [Google Scholar]
  22. Grant, A. (2001). Towards a psychology of coaching. University of Sydney: Unpublished thesis. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gray, P. (2000a). Education Coaching: Module 4 – Removing inner barriers to performance (part 1). Diploma in Performance Coaching (Education). Newcastle: Newcastle College. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gray, P. (2000b). Education Coaching: Module 5 – Removing inner barriers to performance (part 2). Diploma in Performance Coaching (Education). Newcastle: Newcastle College. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gray, P. (2000c). Education Coaching: Module 6 – Removing outer barriers to performance. Diploma in Performance Coaching (Education). Newcastle: Newcastle College. [Google Scholar]
  26. Grinder, J. & Bandler, R. (1976). The structure of magic II. Palo Alto, Ca: Science and Behaviour Books. [Google Scholar]
  27. Guest, G., MacQueen, K.M., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hammersley, M. & Traianou, A. (2012). Ethics in Qualitative Research: Controversies and Contexts. London: Thousand Oaks. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ives, Y. (2008).What is ‘coaching’? An exploration of conflicting paradigms. International Journal of Evidence-based Coaching and Mentoring, 6(2), 100-113. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jackson, P. (2004). Understanding the experience of experience: a practical model of reflective practice for Coaching. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 2 (1), 57 - 67. [Google Scholar]
  31. Koshy, E., Koshy, V. & Waterman, H. (2011). Action research in healthcare. London: Sage Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kudliskis, V. (2019). Coaching in an educational setting Utilising “Techniques of Change”: Enhancing engagement with learning in a post-16 educational setting. Educational Process International Journal, 8(1), 7-31. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lindon, J. (2011). Creating a culture of coaching: upskilling the school workforce in times of change. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lofthouse, R. Leat, D. & Towler, C. (2010). Coaching for teaching and Learning: a practical guide for Schools. Reading: CfBT Education Trust. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mason, J. (2017). Qualitative researching. London: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  36. May. T. (2011). Social research: Issues, methods and process (4th edition). Berkshire: Open University Press, McGraw Hill Education. [Google Scholar]
  37. McNiff, J. (1988). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  38. National College for School Leadership (2016). Women leading in education: become a coach. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pierce, A. (1995). Measurement instruments. In: L.Talbot (Ed.) Principle and practice in nursing research. St Louis, MO: Mosby. [Google Scholar]
  40. Privitera, G. J & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2019). Research methods for education. New York, USA: Sage Publications Inc. [Google Scholar]
  41. Robins, R. V. (2017). Impact through coaching: does the use of models limit connectedness in coaching? Journal of Work-Applied Management, 9(2), 120-128. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rocereto, J., Mosca, J., Forquer Gupta, S., & Rosenberg, S. (2011). The influence of coaching on employee perceptions of supervisor effectiveness and organizational policies. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 9(6), 15-23. [Google Scholar]
  43. Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2015). Research Methods for Business Students (7th edition). London: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sider, S. (2019) Peer coaching in a school in Cairo, Egypt: Implementation, barriers, and pathways to effective adoption barriers, and pathways to effective adoption. Wilfred Laurier University: Education Faculty Publications. [Google Scholar]
  45. Suggett, N. (2012) Coaching in primary schools: A case study. In C. van Nieuwerburgh, (Ed.) Coaching in Education: Getting Better Results for Students, Educators and Parents. London: Karnac. [Google Scholar]
  46. Torbert, W. R. (1981). "Why educational research has been so uneducational: The case for a new model of social science based on collaborative inquiry". In P. Reason & J. Rowan  (Eds.). Human Inquiry. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. pp. 141–151. [Google Scholar]
  47. Toro, J. B. & Werneck, N. (2007). Mobilização Social: um Modo de Construir A Democracia E A Participação. Belo Horizonte: MG Autêntica. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. London: John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Nieuwerburgh, C. (2012). Coaching in Education: Getting Better Results for Student, Educators and Parents. London: Karnac Books. [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Nieuwerburgh, C. (2017). An introduction to coaching skills: A practical guide. London: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wall, T. (2016). Author response: provocative education: from the Dalai Lama’s Cat® to Dismal Land®. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35, (6), 649-653. [Google Scholar]
  52. Wall, T. & Perrin, D. (2015). Slavoj Žižek: A Žižekian Gaze at Education. London: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wallerstein, N. (1992). Powerless, empowerment, and health: implications for health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion 6, pp. 1171-1176. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wallerstein, N & Duran, B. (2010). Community-based participatory research contributions to invention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health (September). [Google Scholar]
  55. Whitehead, J. (1985). An analysis of an individual’s educational development: the basis for personally oriented action research. In M. Shipman, (Ed.) Educational Research: Principles, Policies and Practices. Lewes: Falmer. [Google Scholar]
  56. Williams, M. & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  57. Williams, M. & Vogt, W.P. (Eds.) (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yin, R. K. (1989).  Case study research: Design and method. London, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhou, J. (2012). Problems teachers face when doing action research and finding possible solutions. Chinese Education and Society. 45(4), pp. 68-80. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 18 Issue 3

June 2022

All Articles

International Journal of Progressive Education

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.