 AlAbsi, M. (2013). The effect of openended tasks–as an assessment toolon fourth graders’ mathematics achievement, and assessing students’ perspectives about it. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3), 345351. [Google Scholar]
 Becker, J. P., & Shimada, S. (1997). The Openended Approach: A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics: Reston, Virgina. Mathematics National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, INC. [Google Scholar]
 Bennevall, M. (2016). Cultivating creativity in the mathematics classroom using openended tasks: A systematic review. Retrieved from http://www.divaportal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A909145&dswid=9676. [Google Scholar]
 Bingolbali, E. (2020). An analysis of questions with multiple solution methods and multiple outcomes in mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(5), 669687. [Google Scholar]
 Bingölbali, E., & Bingölbali, F. (2020). Çok doğru cevaplı ve çok çözüm metotlu etkinliklerin ortaokul matematik ders kitaplarındaki yeri. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7(4), 214235. [Google Scholar]
 Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29 (1), 4162. [Google Scholar]
 Bragg, L. & Nicol, C. (2008). Designing openended problems to challenge preservice teachers' views on mathematics and pedagogy, Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 201208). Mexico: Morelia. [Google Scholar]
 Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in US and Chinese students' solving of processconstrained and processopen problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 309340. [Google Scholar]
 Clarke, D.J., Sullivan, P.A., & Spandel, U. (1992). Student Response Characteristics to Openended Tasks in Mathematical and Other Academic Contexts. Research Report No. 7. Oakleigh, Vic.: MTLC. [Google Scholar]
 Evans, E. W. (1964). Measuring the ability of students to respond in creative mathematical situations at the late elementary and early junior high school level (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA. [Google Scholar]
 Foster, C. (2015). The convergent–divergent model: An opportunity for teacher–learner development through principled task design. Educational Designer, 2(8), 125. [Google Scholar]
 Glasnovic Gracin, D. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: a fivedimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 10031024. [Google Scholar]
 Han, S. Y., Rosli, R., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2011). The textbook analysis on probability: The case of Korea, Malaysia and US textbooks. Research in Mathematical Education, 15(2), 127140. [Google Scholar]
 Imai, T. (2000). The influence of overcoming fixation in mathematics towards divergent thinking in openended mathematics problems on Japanese junior high school students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and technology, 31(2), 187193. [Google Scholar]
 Inprasitha, M. (2006). Openended approach and teacher education. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25, 169177. [Google Scholar]
 Kasar, N. (2013). To what extent alternative solution methods and different question types are given place in mathematics teaching?: Examples from real classroom practices (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Gaziantep: Gaziantep, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
 Klavir, R., & Hershkovitz, S. (2008). Teaching and evaluating ‘openended’ problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 20(5), 124. [Google Scholar]
 Kwon, O. N., Park, J. H., & Park, J. S. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an openended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51–61. [Google Scholar]
 Leung, S. S. (1997). On the openended nature in mathematical problem posing. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.) Use of OpenEnded Problems in Mathematics Classroom (pp. 2633). Finland: University of Helsinki. [Google Scholar]
 Lin, C. Y., Becker, J., Ko, Y. Y., & Byun, M. R. (2013). Enhancing preservice teachers’ fraction knowledge through open approach instruction. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 309330. [Google Scholar]
 Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236260. [Google Scholar]
 MoNE (2017). Openended questions from eighty grade central common mathematics exams and the answer key examples. Retrieved from http://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_09/15135732_Mat_acik_uclu.pdf. [Google Scholar]
 Morgan, C. (2003). Criteria for authentic assessment of mathematics: Understanding success, failure and inequality. Quadrante, 12(1), 3751. [Google Scholar]
 Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O'Sullivan, C. Y., & Preuschoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 Assessment Frameworks. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
 Munroe, L. (2015). The openended approach framework. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 97104. [Google Scholar]
 Nohda, N. (2000). Teaching by openapproach method in Japanese mathematics classroom. In: T. Nakahara, & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 39–53). Hiroshima, Japan: Hiroshima University. [Google Scholar]
 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematics, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar]
 Pehkonen, E. (1997). Introduction to the concept “openended problem”. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.). Use of Openended Problems in Mathematics Classroom (pp. 711). Finland: University of Helsinki. [Google Scholar]
 Pehkonen, E. (1999). Openended problems: A method for an educational change. In International Symposium on Elementary Maths Teaching (SEMT 99). Prague: Charles University. [Google Scholar]
 Reitman, W. (1965). Cognition and Thought. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
 Silver, E. A. (1992). Assessment and mathematics education reform in the United States. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(5), 489502. [Google Scholar]
 Silver, E. A., & Lane, S. (1993). Assessment in the context of mathematics instruction reform: The design of assessment in the QUASAR project. In M. Niss (Ed.), Cases of Assessment in Mathematics Education (pp. 5969). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
 Silver, E. A. (1995). The nature and use of open problems in mathematics education: Mathematical and pedagogical perspectives, ZDM, 27(2), 6772. [Google Scholar]
 Sullivan, P., & Clarke, D. (1992). Problem solving with conventional mathematics content: Responses of pupils to open mathematical tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 4260. [Google Scholar]
 Sullivan, P., Warren, E., & White, P. (2000). Students’ responses to content specific openended mathematical tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(1), 217. [Google Scholar]
 Sullivan, P., Warren, E., White, P., & Suwarsono, S. (1998). Different forms of mathematical questions for different purposes: Comparing student responses to similar closed and openended questions. Teaching Mathematics in New Times, 572579. [Google Scholar]
 Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basis of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
 TIMSS (2015). Science and Mathematics 4th and 8th grade released questions. Retrieved from http://timss.meb.gov.tr/wpcontent/uploads/TIMSS_2015_Aciklanan_sorular.pdf. [Google Scholar]
 Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Tabach, M., & Levenson, E. (2010). Multiple solution methods and multiple outcomes—is it a task for kindergarten children?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 217231. [Google Scholar]
 Uçar, Z. T. (2016). Sociomathematical norms. In E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan, & I.O. Zembat (Ed.). Theories in Mathematics Education (pp. 605627). Pegem Akademi: Ankara. [Google Scholar]
 Viseu, F., & Oliveira, I. B. (2017). Openended tasks in the promotion of classroom communication in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 287300. [Google Scholar]
 Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27 (4) 458477. [Google Scholar]
 Yang, D. C., Tseng, Y. K., & Wang, T. L. (2017). A comparison of geometry problems in middlegrade mathematics textbooks from Taiwan, Singapore, Finland, and the United States. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 28412857. [Google Scholar]
 Zaslavsky, O. (1995). Openended tasks as a trigger for mathematics teachers' professional development. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 1520. [Google Scholar]
 Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2006). Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 609626. [Google Scholar]
